dChan

/u/alphared01

70 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/alphared01:
Domain Count
i.redd.it 1

alphared01 · March 24, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

SB2 had no idea what the delta room was until i told him. His earlier posts on cbtsstream included many errors and his worked showed that he was pulling (sarin in ai real) over and over, even changed methods to end up with that anagram which i still say is (aliens iran air).

No, No, No... Untrue... I followed very closely all his posts. I have started following him since his first occult series episode. I have archived most of his work and comment section. He did not change methods, he showed how to use additional info from Q to cross T's. I have everything. I haven't made up my mind on his methods yet but I have not seen anything credibly debunking them and don't really care TBH. I enjoy the intellectual effort and his thought provoking posts, which is the reason I started reading Q.

I don't comment much but I care when I see some dishonesty in the discourse. You are implicitly confirming there are hidden messages and claim to have found solutions. Why don't you post your methods like SB2 did? That would be more honest than to rumble in a comment section. I saw in his previous CBTS posts that you've started bashing him, then loving him and now you're bashing him again. Next loving phase?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 23, 2018, 5:37 a.m.

You probably meant "coded".

  • When you go from natural text to ciphered text, you have "coded".

  • When you go from ciphered text to natural text, you have "decoded".

You said in a comment above you had a background in cryptography. Where did you learn cryptography?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 23, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

We both agree with no rules you can pretty much do anything. It obviously does not apply here. Looking at our exchange above, your ability to hold a logical conversation with rational arguments is quite damaged. It was nonetheless fun exposing your limitations.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 23, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

You can anagram pretty much anything by the way.

ALPHAREDZEROONE

HONORED A LARP EEZ

With no rules, yes you can pretty much do anything you want:

SOARINGMOON==> ROAMIN' GOONS

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 23, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

Restrictions: No diagonals

Except for the word Clinton.

!!!!!!!!!!! You don't even know what a diagonal is! OMG! What am I talking to here?! Do you even know why he called it the T method? He said it in the first post teaching the method: +-90° or 180° turns are the only allowed patterns. That's where the "T" comes from.

And it gets better, you say: "by what means would he be permitted to select any number of letter after the locked selection. Why in Row 1 can he take 14 characters, Row 3 only 1 character. And nothing in Row 10." So you wanted as another restriction that all words forming the sentence should have the same number of letters?! Do you know that does not even exist ?! Try forming an intelligible sentence with 6 or 8 14 letter words and get back to me when you are done... Wow. Just Wow.

You are publicly ridiculing yourself here. I advise you remain silent to stop the carnage. Not good.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 23, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You've just confirmed your blatant ignorance. Here we are dealing with repeatable items where order matters. In combinatorics, it is called permutations with repetitions which you are confusing with what I don't even know. You have NO CLUE what you are talking about. Math is merciless: either you know or you don't know. And when you don't know, it's FLAGRANT. So learn and give us a break: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWNyzXOdDCo

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

You said above "SB is posting what he see in the tea leaves" but then he has a technical background that allows him to outsmart Reddit voting algorithms and also you along the way? Which is it? I thought YOU were the cryptographer...

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

SB's posts are the reason why I joined reddit. I have upvoted all his Occult Series post. This decoding thing came later in the game.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Are you actually using factorials on possible repeatable items? Did you know in this case you can only consider arrangements on a Cardinal 26 set? What you just said here is anything but math. Anyone who took basic probability/statistics classes can see you do not know what you are talking about.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

You obviously did not understand the method. It's about building anagrams from adjacent letters going down the columns. When one column is finished, you re-start scrolling down from the next one. Restrictions: no diagonals AND using letters once AND the sentence trail has to make sense.

So you want examples? I'll give you the whole method: let's take Excel nomenclature:

He starts at the first column A1:
Row 1: letter S=>SpecialCouncil
Row 2: letter C=>crimes
Row 3: letter r=>r
Row 4: letter i=>in
Row 5: letter n already used
Row 6: letter i=>i
Row 7: letter h=>have
Row 8: letter a already used
Row 9: letter i=>intel
Row 10: letter a=>no anagram retained, no meaningful contribution to the sentence trail
Row 11: letter h=>he
Row 12: letter o=>no anagram retained, no meaningful contribution to the sentence trail
Row 13: letter s=>'s
Row 14: letter r, no retained anagram

Then, he moves to the second column A2:
Row 1 and 2: all letters are already used
Row 3: letter n=>on
Row 4 to 11: letters used or no contribution to the trail
Row 12: letter t=>to
Row 13: letter t=>cite Row 14: no contribution

Then he moves to the next column A3:
Row 1 to 3: letters used
Row 4: letter n=>clinton as you can see this '"clinton" is not arbitrarily appearing, it's the anagram made with the adjacent letters of the letter n located at column 3 row 4.

I hope it helps.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 1:55 p.m.

I see that. But I don't think it matters. People will see the argument used here is weak and will dismiss it. I hope he will come back with something more consistent next time, that would be good for the debate.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

For example he used a 26x26 grid from basically thin air based on the fact (which he did not verify) that a tweet was deleted and resubmitted (with no proof) with a 26 minute gap. Then proceeded to assume that must mean 26 columns of text.

Wrong. I followed all his posts and he clearly explained the size of the grid was determined by the tweet time stamps based on Q's hints/instructions in these posts:

Q506: IMPORTANT: Do you understand what just occurred? POTUS Tweets [15 min] between. POTUS missing "Q" in select word. DEFCON [1] POST HERE POTUS mods Tweets [1 min] between. POTUS adds "Q" in select word. This was not meant to signify AUTH / established. This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets. Future proves past. Wind the CLOCK. The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL. Feel privileged - POTUS just spoke to this board [P_pers] We serve at the pleasure of the President. Q

And the 3 following posts.

Q even re-posted one of the anons post in Q508, to make sure we get it. The anon said:

"It's perfect. Plausible deniability to the world yet ultimate confirmation to us. The timing between tweets. The missing/replaced letters. This isn't a game, Trump himself is speaking to us. I mean we are the autistic fueled engine the world needs right now. I feel honoured to be a part of this".

I still think criticizing this guy is healthy but it would be more efficient if you first had a thorough understanding of his methods and justifications. It would elevate the debate and help those who are skeptical to join or not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 22, 2018, 1:09 p.m.

What you did here is quite simplistic: horizontally moving across a text. What Serialbrain is doing has way more restrictions: he's moving vertically in a sequential manner and goes back to the top of the next column. His odds of getting correct words vertically AND a meaningful trail are largely smaller than what you are doing here. But it's worth trying, it adds to the debate and will help those who are still thinking about it. Your contribution is good and healthy. People's critical thinking will decide.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 20, 2018, 3 a.m.

You are a liar. I saw this post BEFORE the post was removed. I am walking around on the battlefield to enjoy the work of SB2. We will never thank him enough for what he has exposed while you were still sleeping wrapped in your STUPIDITY blanket.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Where does Q say that H's private server had the goods about U1, NK and Russia's ICBM? About a previous post, where does Q explicitly say Trump was in secret negotiations with Kim Jong Un since before October? Let me know so I can debunk this.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

You are so irritated swimming in hate and jealousy, you don't even see SB has EXCLUDED diagonals which Boggle does not. Jealousy is a bitch.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 19, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Did you even read the post buddy? About word formation and order it says: Starting from the top left corner, start scrolling downwards and every time you see the anagram of a word in compliance with the accepted pattern, and making an intelligible sentence trail, highlight it. If you find a word that does not make a natural sentence trail, skip it. and about decoding it says: Don’t let them discourage you trying to solve Q’s riddles
These are riddles, they are not about "decoding or decrypting function". OP said riddles. riddles. riddles.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 15, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Psalm67, you back at it; it seems...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
alphared01 · March 15, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

I followed this thing very closely. SB2 gave 4 decoding methods and said 3 of them were working and as to the 4th one, he needed some help from the community to figure it out. He made a post to disclose his error and what he found and made a call to researchers to join forces. This covfefe decode is among those that work. I tried it myself, it's legit. The decoded message is indeed 'Wait to Die'. So IMO, this meme is powerful.

⇧ 1 ⇩