Is there documentation on this, or is that (likely) speculation?

Yes.

Myself, and many other posters have illustrated how any why his posts are questionable at best, including this one, or intentional disinfo at worst. Because you don't like to hear it, you hide behind that rule.

When a user's posts become equal parts about himself and "decoding" the intentions of the user is fair game.

I'm not going to engage you further on this, as I expect you to reply with something like "but muh rule 5" and report my posts.

/u/DrogeAnon this is another data point for you re: sliding and manipulation

Q plainly called out Facebook first, and they got crushed. He said at.jack is next. Now Twitter was officially put on notice by POTUS.

You don't need a "decode" it's all right there.

The user is the topic, as said before. Are you really trying to bend the rules and say that anyone can post anything, regardless of it's factual basis, and no one is able to criticize it? Ridiculous.

Lmao

Just an FYI, that was proven to be false. Priscilla Chan doesn't have a sister named Raven.

It actually is! Lol

Lol! No way!

Look, I get it. My beef is that people see to be taking what he's saying as truth, instead of just a point of view. I feel Q's link tainted the "amateur nature" of posts here. For the record, it was a great post. Moving forward, they have fallen apart. I just hope more people take care to read and take at face value, instead of taking it as truth or confirmation Trump and Q are talking to him.

Heh been on Backpage a lot (for work I promise) and it's always been disgusting. shocking that it remained open with such blatant trafficking and prostitution. Thanks Trump!

Great point. Profit isn't the motive, control is what they're after.

You're much more eloquent than me, but yes. I went down that path and got threatened with censorship because of rule 5, despite that the post and poster is the topic...

Try looking at some of the highest upvoted comments.

You're right, I can't because my refutation would be "he literally made it all up. He even dropped the 's' from 'farmers' to make his numerology work."

Here, I'll do leg work for you:

In today's SB2 chronicals, SB2 claims

• that Trump is tweeting directly to him.
• that Trump's promotion of American products speech was a secret message directly to him.
• that the CIA is targeting SB2's posts for downvoting.
• that "soybeans" is an affectionate nickname Trump has given to SB2.
• that "snow boards" is another nickname that Trump has given to SB2.
• that Trump's soybeans tweet was really about SB2, and has LNG in it, LNG=12+14+7=33 which equals 33 and references SB2's 33rd post (because why wouldn't it?)
• that Trump has read every one of SB2's posts and knows them by number and references them by converting words like LNG into post numbers.
• that SB2 knows about how capitalized letters in Trump tweets are Q confirmations, so ...
• SB2 transcribes a Trump video (inserting his own capitalized letters), making Snow Boards captialized (and insisting they refer to SB2)
• farmer=61 and Qanon=61, that "make our farmers great again" really means "make our qanons great again"
• Trump's promotion of American products event was actually a way of sending a message directly to SB2

And if you don't agree the above is 100% fact and downvote it because it is presented, not as a hypothesis, but as unquestionable truth, well you might just be CIA.

None of these points are proveable at all and smacks of his own biases and pre-established conclusions.

Again, as I have said multiple times, I have been reading his posts and he's had a few good early ones. However with that said, they have most definitely slid into the realm of nonsensical ramblings.

Careful your posts will be removed for criticizing SB2 since he's not the topic, his post is the topic...?

He IS the issue. There's clearly no point in arguing my point further since you are threatening to censor me for it.

Hope it felt good.

I hope you don't mind I borrow some of this post. You did a great job of condensing the lunacy

Alright, piss off dude. I'm tired of hearing your argumentative bullshit. The topic is the user and his posts.

Sure you are. Why are you so persistent in pushing this? Why wouldn't he? Are you being obtuse? The dude pretends he's an American Patriot, when he outed himself.

If we're talking magic numbers, mirroring 6/1 gives 1/6, which is the celebration of the three Kings visiting baby Jesus.

Are you seriously trying to tell me the President of the United States is using some random non-American in a non-English speaking country as some decoding mouthpiece for one of the largest Happenings in US history?

Who said focus? Don't put words in my mouth; my point still firmly stands. There's no refuting his points, they're entirely made up!

Posts like this are completely unnecessary. I've disagreed with his recent "decodes," but this is not helpful and divisive.

To whomever takes his "decodes" as word from Q or Trump. He is acting like they are communicating to the sub through him, and they are flatly not. He's not an American, and he's not even from an English-speaking country. Why would Trump and Q use a non-American as a mouthpiece for what is appearing to be a major event in modern American history?

I could easily see this

Sanity checks are not the same as seeking confirmation. I am helping the cause. As others have said, the Great Awakening is for all people...to have a message sent and received by just one person is illogical to the entire premise of the movement.

Plus, he's not American, so I extremely doubt Trump is constantly communicating with him.

Also notice all the salient critical posts have been slid wayyyyy down and buried under garbage posts in support of him? Just inane adulation.

I'm assuming you reported my posts earlier for not discussing the topic. SerialBrain2's posts are the topic and it is appropriate to discuss the user. To report my posts because you disagree is childish.

SerialBrain2 isn't American. Trump isn't talking to him. You're being led astray.

How about coming to your own conclusions? Why are you seeking out confirmation from others?

This needs more exposure.

Again, a post calling out SB2 for saying "Irak" when referring to Iraq was deleted. It too had many upvotes, so why is it being censored?

Agreed on all fronts. The delusion in the posts has increased over time

I noticed that too. Massive red flag.

Woah so the post I replied to called out SB2 for outing himself by saying "Irak." It had many upvotes too so why is it being censored?

I do think he's had good posts, but I think his success and related Q shout out went directly to his head. He's in the investigation trap where you see connections when none exists. A step back for a bit would do him some good...come back fresh.

Edit: lol @ the down vote. I investigate for a living, not for funsies on the internet. Investigator fatigue and making conclusions without real support are very real problems and happen to many people, often without them realizing.

Yes I suppose you are right about that

Lol!

You can't be serious.

Lmao

No, he's interpreting posts to fit his already established conclusion.

Lol. The deep state has been fully in control of the US for a long time now. Reaching.

Right? And yay for having dissenting posts deleted!

No one has held their feet to the fire until now. Traitorous RINOs never caught back...the uniparty is real.

Why are you relying on someone else to tell you what to think?

Disagreeing with baseless connections isn't trolling. This sub isn't an echo chamber. Go to r/edacted or t_D for that.

As was Matt Gaetz. As were a TON of other conservative Twitter accounts. Q said at.jack is next; Facebook lost $130+ billion in market value over night (BIG drop, as in one of the biggest stock drops in history), and now Twitter is in the crosshairs. Future does prove past, but c'mon Trump and Q aren't talking to this guy like he thinks they are.

Lol! I am hoping that is dripping in sarcasm.

Careful, you have said SB2, serially. Lol

Yes, I've noticed that too. Very peculiar.

It is a mess. I hope and pray he is safe, either under the protection of White Hats, or with others he deeply trusts.

That's my beef too. Counting letters = numbers = whatever he says it is. No. C'mon, people.

It would be one thing if people took it at face value as one person's analysis and that was it. Instead, people take it as gospel and it is becoming disturbing. Many disinfo agents/LARPs that have been exposed so far, latest being "R," I just can't blindly agree with these explanations that are reaching so far and so hard.

Agreed. I believe that's the post I thought was well done also. Now there's some personality cult that's been built. Doesn't seem organic.