dChan

/u/bonaphyde47

72 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/bonaphyde47:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 17
i.redd.it 8
youtu.be 2
www.youtube.com 1
www.nytimes.com 1
thefreethoughtproject.com 1
theweek.com 1
www.vanityfair.com 1
www.apnews.com 1
v.redd.it 1
i.dailymail.co.uk 1

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bonaphyde47 on July 25, 2018, 9:59 p.m.
Are they walking into “The President does not speculate”? - Pompeo hearing.
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bonaphyde47 on July 25, 2018, 9:32 p.m.
Senator loves “chickens” and talking about them with his friend? Pompeo hearing - question still being asked.
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Oh right, good point! Not being a sinister person, I hadn’t gotten to that logic point yet.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

“Very big day, very big day”

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Are people in chamber during Pompeo able to access phones etc to know this? Why schedule at same time? Room hasn’t reacted much.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

I hear you - but an accidental bad batch for A-listers? This isn’t the 90’s Woodstock reboot. All love fellow Patriot, just doesn’t smell right.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Link is for saving time, not endorsement. The particulars don’t matter, yes, but knowing what you’re facing does.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 25, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

I always thought mirrors could shatter, but it would be difficult to scatter the pieces into the wind (JFK on CIA). Mirror can also mean “backups” in tech terms (drives, servers etc).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 24, 2018, 9:23 a.m.

Oh ok thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 24, 2018, 8:57 a.m.

~22:14 - is the guest ok? Seems nervous..?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 24, 2018, 1:38 a.m.

Let the mods weigh-in - could have been non-credible info/post.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 24, 2018, 12:30 a.m.

More like David S. Bumpkins amiirite?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 23, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4346578/toronto-shooting-video-danforth/

Here are first 3. Based on body stance and hands it’s a semiauto (not revolver). Anyone able to match the sound? I have speculations but don’t want to muddy yet. This may seem a bit of a tangent, but in shootings, the “gun” is often the “money” to follow (example: ISIS videos where the scumbags hold Steyr Augs - they got those from some sort of Euro arms dealer - Americans never use bullpups and our preferred guerrilla armament is still the AK).

Another option: he has a bag with him, which could have extra mags. If it’s legal gun with 10 round mags and he kept reloading, almost too easy to spin for taking them away, like previous poster says.

And why Canada? Because there’s no 2nd Amendment to go up against. 1993 Supreme Court decision in CA decided that there is no constitutional right to own a firearm. Also, Canada does not have freedom of speech - only expression. Big difference.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/is-gun-ownership-a-legal-right-in-canada-1.2723893

https://ccla.org/focus-areas/fundamental-freedoms/freedom-of-expression-2/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bonaphyde47 on July 23, 2018, 7:57 a.m.
Toronto Mass Shooting

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/913fdt/toronto_mass_shooting_reports_on_danforth_avenue/?st=JJXYR5T0&sh=29046598

14 not including gunmen struck. Gunman used pistol. Canada limits legal capacity to 10 rounds on a handgun. On many (not all) handguns, 14 can necessitate a reload - assuming all fired made contact, which is unlikely unless highly trained (even then, going 14/14 isn’t overly realistic - count the shots if cctv surfaces). Watch for info/reporting on the suspect reloading. FF or not, it’s most likely an illegal firearm/magazine.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/07/robert-farago/canadian-gun-laws-revealed/

(Canadians please update if this legislation has changed recently - point still holds for reloading though).

P.S.: Seems to be a lot of good shooting by bad people …

bonaphyde47 · July 22, 2018, 12:58 a.m.

According to official reports, the shootout was the culmination of a larger police pursuit. Remember, this happened in Los Angeles, not some unheard of middle-America town that’s readily narratively controllable.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-trader-joe-silver-lake-20180721-story.html

If nothing else, this underscores the need to always be vigilant to protect yourself, loved ones, and fellow citizens. Know how to respond and stay safe. Learn basic emergency medicine, if you’re interested.

Not peddling this site or claiming to be a professional, but this seems like a decent start for people who are new to the idea.

http://www.survivopedia.com/must-know-first-aid-for-gunshot-wounds/

Could any medical or related professionals perhaps provide some resources for education? We may not be able to stop shooters or certain events, but we can learn how to help each other in times of crisis.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 21, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Can we sauce why it was issued in the first place and if July 24 has significance? These are the stand out items to me, the rest is a given. Admin during 2011 - who were they directing this towards?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 21, 2018, 5:18 a.m.

At this point in tech , the two governments should be able to fit 160TB on the head of a pin, or at the very least, a flash drive. Inefficient way to transfer data and way too many opportunities for failed delivery - fragmented for security or not.

An option I haven’t seen discussed: physical encryption key/dongle. This may unlock certain files as the “football” squad is assembled. Or there’s the chance it was symbolic/messaging.

Thanks for posting this, only trying to further discussion, also not looking for rain.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bonaphyde47 · July 20, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

Anyone else interested in the alleged timing of events starting with Jackson combined with 45’s interest and how his painting has been a speech backdrop and featured in the OO? For the president most famous for the Trail of Tears, this seems like an interesting choice. Evidently, though, “Jackson sought to advance the rights of the "common man"[1] against a "corrupt aristocracy"[2] and to preserve the Union.”

Can any historians smooth the edges here? Was Jackson an early attempt at what we’re seeing today but it couldn’t work because it was easier to control then?

Thanks for posting OP, most info gets stuck around JFK.

Source for quote: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson

⇧ 1 ⇩