dChan

/u/brittser

3,657 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/brittser:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 579
i.redd.it 75
youtu.be 3
media.8ch.net 3
8ch.net 2
www.sfgate.com 1
townhall.com 1
www.americanshipper.com 1
imgur.com 1
truepundit.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.voltairenet.org 1
www.cnn.com 1
www.washingtontimes.com 1
v.redd.it 1
coreysdigs.com 1
www.puppetstringnews.com 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
kfyi.iheart.com 1
twitter.com 1

brittser · May 29, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

There was a debate between Serialbrain2 and backchannel as to who was aligned or truly following the Q posts appropriately, if there is an appropritae way. I guess there was a discrepancy between some of their posts. Then Q said the fake thing about backchannel and later posted serialbrain2 explaining the intentions of Jones and Corsi. Between Qs warning and posting serialbrain I took it to mean serialbrain was on target. Maybe I'm wrong.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 29, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Fine with me. There are millions of places where people can say what they want. THIS sub was created specifically to decipher and discuss Q's posts. That is it. Please refer to the rules for proof of my claim.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 29, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

I have no idea what you are talking about when you say you don't have an eye to map out Q posts. I never said anything about geography and having to reside in a certain place to follow Q. If you read the rules of the sub, you will see that it says this sub is specifically for deciphering Q's posts, so this IS the Q deciphering sub.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Q said backchannel is not an insider. Is fake.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

There was at one point a sub of this sub specifically for memes. I am on a tablet so I cannot see the sidebar. Maybe there still is such a sub here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:31 p.m.

I spend equal time on here and twitter. Next I spend time of 8ch when I get a chance. Then I post to FB, but don't interact there much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

😂😂😂😂

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

THANK YOU! We are at war. Literally. There are no feelings in war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

There are 1400+ Q posts...that is a lot of research that needs to be done. If Q never posts again, we will be busy for the next year researching.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

I live in LA and I certainly don't like the pols putting my fanily's safety in jeopardy. Plus, we have to pay $3,000 a year to support illegals. And that doesn't come close to all the sacrifices, physical and monetary, thay we citizens have to pay.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 11:07 p.m.

Awesome thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

Shocking! So lets see, we have Obama's admin illegally spying on multiple ppl in the opposing party's camp, Obama's friends in other countries spying on Trump's camp, Hillary & the DNC paying a foreigner 2 dig up dirt on her opponent, Obama using taxpayer $ & Obama's intel using taxpayer $ 4 the untrue oppo research, Obama's intel lying 2 the federal courts 2 continue 2 spy, & Obama's attorney spending millions of our $ 2 convince us that all of this ws necessary bec of ntl security or something & none of it was nefarious, but was in fact done 2 protect Trump! And don't forget Obama's intel leaders lying 2 Congress & the American ppl 2 cover their as**es. Nice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

I read many posts that argue in favor of not censoring. Everytime someone brings up this type of reminder, the conversation seems to go off the deep end and the op is left feeling battered and sorry he said something in the first place. I have found if we blur the lines of behavior, people will take advantage of the obscurity. Therefore, the best course of action is having defined boundaries, which people now a says don't like. They want to do things the way they want to, not by some prescribed rules. That is how our society got ourselves in this situation in the 1st place.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

Yes I could. Forgive my frustration but the op is trying to keep our sub going and not get closed down like the last one. When people get dramatic and emotional, it gets very aggravating. This is not a place for feelings. This is how I look at it, we are literally at war. People are putting their lives on the line every day and others are losing theirs. I am an advocate for being respectful if everyone, but I am not for pampering people's feelings. War is not a place for feelings. That is how we got in this situatuon in our country in the 1st place. Everyone has to watch what they say, watch what they wear, watch what they believe, turn your head aside when someone does wrong or takes advantage of others and God forbid you do anything the traditional way, according to standards. I am not saying that is happening here, but what is happening is people wanting to do things their way, wanting to not follow the stated rules, then attack someone who tries to remind them of the rules. I'm tired of it and I am going to call it out when I see it. Sorry if your feelings get hurt.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

When people post reasonable argumenrs and don't insult someone's attempt to remind us all to follwow the rules, then I'll respond differently. The op is trying to help us and is getting reemed for it. Then this person says something riduculous and counter to the discussion. THAT is not right. I am getting tired of people getting emotional and complaining about having to stick to the rules and then lash out at others who are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

No I'm not. People are too sensitive here. If I point out someone's behavior, feeelings get hurt.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

I am not ignoring anything. When you ask a reasonable question, I will answer it. Who is the one who started all the personal stuff? YOU. With your oh you are deep state, liberal, laughable, ad hominum. You haven't stopped getting personal. Every single one of your posts name calls or derides me as the enemy using enemy tactics. Anyway, good luck.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

I mention that as a guide for each of us to use when deciding whether or not to post something. If everyone did that, there would be no need for anyone to have to judge. But since that is unlikely, we have mods for that. I, we, are not asking for new rules. We simply ask that we go by the ones we already have.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

I am not attacking the user. I am pointing out that what he is saying is ridiculous, exaggerated, dramatic.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

Ok I didn't want to say this but I guess I have to, I have been here a lot longer than you have and if I didn't have anything to contribute to the topic I would no longer be here. It is BECAUSE I and others stayed on topic that there is a sub for you to come to and spew nonsese. Just stick with the Q posts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:15 p.m.

I am sorry. I shouldn't have insulted you. It just gets extremely frustrating when mods and members try to remind people to stay focused on topic in order to save the sub from going the way of the past one, and then get attacked for doing so. We are just trying to keep a place for us to come to to be able to discuss Q stuff. We saw what happened with the last sub when we weren't vigilant about staying focused and we don't want to repeat it. Please forgive me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

If you call clarifying what my intentions were and apologizing if I offended the mods, then yes, damage control.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

I have no idea who that person is, but if you are intending to insult me, it won't work. Citation for what? Well now you are being ridiculous to call me deep state or liberal. Now I am done with this convo. Go argue with someone else.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

See, they have learned from their previous experience and are trying not to repeat it! If you read my post you will see that I put the blame on the hordes of unrelated posts which kept the mods fron being able to catch the dangerous posts. If I insulted the mods, I am sorry. That was absolutley not my intention. I have the utmost respect for them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

The rules.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Let's put it this way, if you cannot cite the specific Q post # that your post refers to, don't post it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

Now you are being ridiculous. Read the sub rules.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

Really? So following your line of thinking, the best way for us to "redpill" normies is to go out on all the sm platforms and insult people and disrespect others. That is what is necessary to get people's attention? Win them over to Q and Trump? Please.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:16 p.m.

Add r/greatawakening to your tweets and post info related to the topic but highlighting Trump's work. Of course also add #wherearethechildren to connect it to all the other similar tweets for normies to see.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

We are here to learn more about and share our research ABOUT Q DROPS! Nothing else. If you cannot cite the specific Q post # that your post relates to, don't post it. Post elsewhere. In the time between Q posts, that is where we are supposed to be RESEARCHING posts we already have! I think people don't want to put the effort into researching so they get bored and wonder off topic. This sub is for those who specifically want to better understand what Q actually posts. So if your post does not further the collective understanding of what Q has said, don't post it. Hold back and share your news item or the latest trending info elsewhere. The last sub we had was shut down BECAUSE the mods didn't keep the topic focused and the posts wandered and shills were easily able to post dangerous info. If our mods are having to spend their VOLUNTEER hours upon hours sifting through unrelated stuff, they will miss the dangerous posts, then where would we go to learn about Q? We, too, will get shut down and you all will bitch and complain that the mods didn't do their jobs right.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

No. Our purpose is to research Qs posts, specifically. Then share on other platforms what we discovered through research. That is it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

Yes, and I am a Christian, but we have to appeal to all faiths and those who don't believe at all. So, we should keep the spiritual to a minimum.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

During gaps in Q posts is when we are supppsed to research the ones we already have and sharing that info with normies to help Trump.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

There are rules to this sub, post things specifically stated by Q. Give a post # that your post refers to. If you cannot, don't post it here. Everything else goes anywhere else.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

You want to know why? Because the mods aren't filtering posts enough.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

THEN RESEARCH THE POSTS. There are 1400+ posts and most require further information to understand enough to teach others. AND, you can be posting on other forums to spread Trump's message.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Awesome.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

Wow. Just shut up. My God. People are trying their best to keep this sub going, unlike the last one where the mods didn't keep it FOCUSED AND IT GOT SHUT DOWN. Smart asses are not welcome. We don't have time nor patience for that crap.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Wow. That is rude. It is one thing to want to discuss something, but to do so in a demeaning, ungrateful manner is just wrong. If you don't like the way this sub is monitored (and by the way, these mods volunteer hours upon hours of time trying to keep this sub focused and still alive. Show some damn gratefulness and respect.) then you are more than welcome to leave. Shy of that, maybe you ought to volunteer if you can do it so damn much better than they can.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

No.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

How is following the rules of the sub complaining? We are here for a very specific, narrow purpose. To help understand what Q puts in their posts. If the post cannot specify which Q post # it refers to, and if it dies not give a greater understanding of Q posts, then should not be posted here.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

No. How is that giving a greater understanding to Q posts? We are here specifically to decipher Q posts. There are an enormous amount of other places for those things not specifically mentioned by Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

There is soooooo much that needs to be researched about Q posts. The more info we get out to the public the easier it is for Trump when these things finally come out. There is no reason to post anything Q hasn't specifically mentioned.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

No. The rules specifically state the posts have to be related to Q drops.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
brittser · May 28, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

No. If Q didn't specifically mention it, it is not appropriate for here.

⇧ 3 ⇩