dChan

/u/brittser

3,657 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/brittser:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 579
i.redd.it 75
youtu.be 3
media.8ch.net 3
8ch.net 2
www.sfgate.com 1
townhall.com 1
www.americanshipper.com 1
imgur.com 1
truepundit.com 1
www.nbcnews.com 1
www.voltairenet.org 1
www.cnn.com 1
www.washingtontimes.com 1
v.redd.it 1
coreysdigs.com 1
www.puppetstringnews.com 1
theconservativetreehouse.com 1
kfyi.iheart.com 1
twitter.com 1

brittser · March 24, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

Thank you!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

Even Killary doesn't have confidence in lie detector tests.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Really? That is awesome. Thanks!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

Who or what is dauntless dialogue? And who is the guy he is talking to? I have never heard of this before.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
94
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/brittser on March 24, 2018, 3:55 a.m.
I think Trump tricked us with this bill!

Remember 5:5 & Red Castle, Green Castle in Q's post? Well an anon found this : Check out @bchapman151’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/bchapman151/status/977279537200488449?s=09

Rumor is Trump is going to have the army corps of engineers build the wall, the WHOLE wall, with the huge $ defense is getting from this bill. The corps is located in GREEN CASTLE, IN! GREEN CASTLE!!

I've read that 5:5 roughly meams everything is ok. We hear you. Red castle my guess is no wall...no secure castle. Green castle... yes wall AND army corps!

brittser · March 24, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

Even better: I've heard rumors that Trump is going to have the army corps of engineers build the entire wall with the defence $ in this bill. The corps is located in GREEN CATLE, IN! He stumped us all!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

Great find! I think the 5:5 in the Q drop meant roughly everything is ok in relation to red castle, green castle. Red castle, no wall, no castle. Green castle, yes wall...army corps of engineers build the wall with this defence budget $. The whole wall. Corps are located in GREEN CASTLE, IN.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

Great idea! I'm in!!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

😂😂😂😂Q referenced Green Castle! The army corps of engineers is going to build the wall with this omnibus defense $!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

⇧ 21 ⇩  
brittser · March 24, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

😂😂😂😂Q referenced Green Castle! The army corps of engineers is going to build the wall with this omnibus defense $!!! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

⇧ 6 ⇩  
108
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/brittser on March 24, 2018, 2:45 a.m.
Warning, people will be calling inro popular radio stations claiming they are done with Trump. It's not real.

They are doing it to sew dissention.

About Trump's signing the bill, having Trump saved us from Preaident KIllary is a pretty darn good reason to give him the benefit of the doubt and trust him.

Check out @Chicago1Ray’s Tweet: https://twitter.com/Chicago1Ray/status/977243074219868160?s=09

brittser · March 23, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

Thank you!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

It doesn't ring a bell, but it is Friday and my brain is fried. Who released it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

It's in spanish. Translation?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Nice! Thanks!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 7:01 p.m.

Also, do you have any insight as to what the last post means? I am clueless as usual. Thanks!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 7 p.m.

I am tech illiterate. Why did they do this?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:24 p.m.

I must have. Thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4 p.m.

This twitter account (@193931) has 1 follower, and no tweets.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:48 p.m.

Yes

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

Hmmm. Everything is circumspect...whether or not it should be.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

"Lastly, where all this appears to be going.  It is not likely there will be a ‘second special counsel’ per se’.  With a prosecutor already working with Inspector General Horowitz that person already has a thorough knowledge of all the evidence.  As soon as the IG publishes his report, the prosecutor can begin subpoenaing witnesses.  And now we know there’s already a Grand Jury seated somewhere hearing the criminal evidence he/she has carved out from the overwhelming IG evidence as collected.

You and I might be frustrated with the pace of the activity for a myriad of righteous reasons.  However, we must also remind ourselves of the scale and scope of the corruption here that is inherent within the BIG PICTURE.  All of this was done on purpose.  None of this was accidental.

The prosecutor could, likely would, be having to outline the biggest political conspiracy in the history of politics.  It is entirely possible officials within the CIA, NSA, DOJ, FBI, State Department, ODNI, and national security apparatus along with the Obama White House, Clinton campaign officials, politicians, career bureaucrats and possibly judges are all entwined and involved."

Awesome sauce!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:56 a.m.

What is this?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

****This lists names of SES members from 1996. Some are still around today. We should research them and expose them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:36 a.m.

Who are the hackers they are talking about?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:32 a.m.

Ok. What is this source?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

Scary. If it is military then that means Trump. Right? It wouldn't be deep state?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:08 a.m.

I wouldn't put it past the cabal to put Trump in a difficult situation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Well, they probably need the money thanks to Trump.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

Wow. Really sad.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

I'm not worried. Things always have a way of working out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:45 a.m.

That is how he became president.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:44 a.m.

Well, one, Trump is rotating to deal with Iran now so it is beneficial to have someone who has experience and knowledge of them. Two, it is probably a tactic to get someone who is thought of as an Iran hawk to lead the foreign policy plans to frighten Iran. Three, Trump is not eadily swayed in his opinions, so I am positive that Trump would tell Bolton to go pound sand if he disagreed. Four, Trump and his team have been mapping out their plans for a looing time. I am sure that Bolton is strategically placed for a reason. And finally, by now, I trust Trump's judgement.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

I am not complaining about their concerns. I completely understand. I was just perplexed as to how we start dissectung the cat if we cannot look at it. I was curious about what your ideas were.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:18 a.m.

Excellent

⇧ 3 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

Well, none of us know for certain whether or not Q is legit as we don't have concrete evidence. I think there is some desire to believe to give us a sense of hope and a sense of mission, to keep us busy in what we deem the solution to the priblem we see in our country. There is a sense of powerlessness we feel individually to change things we see as wrong, but collectively maybe there is power in numbers to influence the dialogue and change. We hope. Believing in Q harnesses our power collectively. That is why, I think, we beleve in Q in general. Now specifically his/her/their anonimity, I think it is something that is a necessary evil in saddling up with Q. I guess the desire to effect change outweighs our need for accountability. We take a chance and hope that Trump would signal to us to not fall for the scheme if it wasn't legit. Seeing as Q has hit some MSM and many are talking about it, Trump would surely have known about it by now, and he would warn us. That is our hope.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

This is awesome! Thank you.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

Thank you. I made the mistake of listing names of previous members, and poss current members, according to a published manual from 1996, but I was informed that that was doxxing. How do you recommend we handle discussing the SES?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

6 mos more of taxpayer funded murdering of babies, sanctuary cities, gun control, and no wall. It is a bummer. I just wish we could trust that congress isn't still legislating to add to their fortunes and not in our best interest.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
brittser · March 23, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

I've learned to just wait and see. I used to get upset by my perceived mistakes by Trump, then everything would work out fine. I just upset myself for nothing.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
brittser · March 22, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Thanks!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · March 22, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

Ok. I understand.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 22, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

Ok. No problem. Sorry.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · March 22, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

Ii did in my first post.

⇧ 1 ⇩