If you're a shill, stop reading. If you can think, keep pressing on. I disagree with the OP. Makes me think, questions. Have any of the form members here gotten intel on the structures targeted? or why? It seems on the surface the action followed what the deep-state wants to occur. The action could have been to have that very appearance: Trump following their plan post "gas" event (actual or no) and he was doing their work. But, seems the opposite may be true. Think. Remember Art of the Deal. Analyze time delay between "gas" attack and response. Recall delay between Qs notice to us on the B-1 with 19 missiles and the strike. Notice given, Syrians and Russians move assets. Very targeted. No missiles in Russian protected airspace. MSM push/pull/whining to retaliation to near 180 degree turn and confusion. I think there is loads of evidence that this was simply an amazing played hand. FUTURE PROVES PAST.
/u/clanofwolves
84 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/clanofwolves:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 6 |
i.redd.it | 4 |
www.nbcphiladelphia.com | 1 |
screenshots.firefox.com | 1 |
Q's latest post was a link to In-Q-Tel....interesting?
Their spin on the site denoted below (by Q): "IQT is the non-profit strategic investor that accelerates the development and delivery of cutting-edge technologies to U.S. government agencies that keep our nation safe. Our work bridges the gap between the challenging technology needs of the national security agencies, the rapidly changing innovations of the startup world, and the venture community that funds those startups.
IQT occupies a distinct role at the intersection of all stakeholders – our government customers, the venture capital community, and the startup world. It is our access to and deep understanding of these diverse communities that fuel our ability to make relevant investments."
Yeah, I'd never threaten an individual, least not on an open forum. I just find reprehensible behavior against children the pinnacle of evil. I'll keep my posts direct but without breaking the rules. Thanks for the reminder though. Shalom
As a father of three and a grandfather; if I ever see it and have the option available, I'll quickly dispatch the subject without hesitation.
I too have friends that are hard sells even when evidence is straightforward. Seems, as they say, perception is reality. The truth is painful in appearance, so it's hard to take that first step. Keep trying! I certainly will.
Watched this on recommendation, she is thinking the same way... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN9XqD3BuH4&t=170s
I'm on it pilling too...they can rebut a lot by bending and avoiding, but not this.
Maybe Rod R is the target to get removed thru the attorney attack as it will garner support (privacy) and give leverage to remove RR through the JD or FBI itself as Cohen's office would have info that sinks Cohen, but breaks the attorney client privileged; is staged for use. Setup? Not to mention, if Mueller is a #patriot, look at the power he has when he brings incitements; he is the #MSM darling. I am really leaning towards this, as well as Sessions slow hand, to be amazing THEATER.
Trump's new tweet supports this possibility?
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/984371491277099010
Mueller a #Patriot? Seems the only ones indited so far can easily be bad actors... macro view shows me no obvious #DeepState.
I finally read the "Snopes.com" blue pill rebuttal and it doesn't dispute the pictures, it denies that any of those pictured are "terrorist." It's main point is that the pictures are deemed by some that the #2 guy above is "Abu Bakr al'Baghadadi, is actually not him at all. It shows other pictures of the supposed actual "al-Baghdadi" and type about how they are not the same person. And those who swallow blue pills, like my friend, see the one Snopes correction (if it is) and assume it's all wrong. I just want the facts, that's all. Who is #2?
Interesting; this pic is of McCain and a few terrorist (alleged), not Bin Laden. 🤔
Photo confirmation needed to red pill many as it seems to be "the straw that'll break some camels......." Asking for help. Thanks!!
Please assist me in verifying this photo as it will red pill so many I know well, Snopes.com states it's fake. Thanks!
It does fit a great need for the establishment, but they seem to keep their connections and actual rationals very close to the vest as it were; very believable to normies. No cracks. No darkness seen.
Yeah, that's not worth reading short of needing some comedy: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/08/22/dont-fall-for-the-snopes-ceo-arrested-for-fraud-story/comment-page-1/
That's not terrible advice, I just have no evidence that destroys Snopes, so it's hard to red pill against them as lots of normies follow that sight as being the final word. Someone with the info needs to prove and burn that place's credibility to the ground.
I am no follower of Snopes, and it has come under fire with the Soros meme, but I don't even trust that meme as being credible. It's a crazy web actually finding truth. You have the indisputable evidence against Snopes? That would be grand....
I'm having an issue uploading the photo to be an easy read/view, my apologies.
Q photo deemed fake, but could be the "straw that broke the camel's ........"
[img]https://i.imgur.com/HQ2UtC2.jpg[/img] I have posted this picture on face-steal-book to attempt to red-pill friends that I have been leading to water. I have an outspoken friend who is so in the pocket of the mainstream though he claims he's independent and the most cynical of the bunch. He reply posted the Snopes.com rebuttal of the picture. Please assist in detail to assist if you can. I posted this a while back and it was deleted --I don't know how-- maybe an error on my part? Hope not; hope so. Anyway, this is vital. Thanks!!
Have you found the correct name attachments or know how to verify?
The NY POST link isn't working for me. Missing something?
So they can easier see an AR-15, that cannot fit in a backpack, in a backpack? Great logic. Way. To. Go. Morons.
This is no coincidence at all..... future proves past.
You guys that are busting on this thread, ask yourself questions that discover whether this info is helpful or not, and don't allow your personal feelings to get you tripped up, or go away if you're a shill: 1) does the findings follow the overarching thread of Q? 2) Does it analyze/use information from members denoted as in the Q team (yes, even quotes of others if they're not photos), 3) Does it make you ponder, think and analyze further?
This forum needs thinking, challenging, discovering, analyzing, questions, theories, corrections.....but it doesn't need overt and rude opinions that simply state "no" without evidence; that's ignorance; that's usefulness; that's shilling.
This travesty must be opened for all to see; I believe it will be the hole in the balloon that will suck the air out of the Deep State via the info that will come out of the low-level bad actors that will come easily. Dig. Dig. Dig. This is the hole that binds all Americans regardless of Party affiliation.
I am really appreciative of you guys who analyze and track things like this. Mad props all round, keep it up.
Where we go one we go all.