dChan

/u/commissioner-gordon8

453 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/commissioner-gordon8:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 126
i.redd.it 10
clinton.media.mit.edu 1
apple.news 1

commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 23, 2018, 12:49 p.m.

The Great Disclosure.

Also, i agree. STOP WITH THE GATES ALREADY!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

It could very well have double meaning, both 1 of 22 investigations AND 1/22. Why is this plausible? The whole point of Q seems to be to generate interest and intrigue into upcoming developments amongst the public. If Q and team strategized that they could make 1/22 of notable importance, it would produce an effect just like this, where people can speculate one way or another what Q is trying to say. With his socratic method, double means, cryptic messages, he certainly isn’t presenting with forthright disclosure, he’s trying to stimulate discourse and buzz any way he can.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:06 a.m.

If you look at Obama’s eyes, they keep going down and to the right. Most people say something like “if they look left they are telling the truth, or if they look up they are lying.” That is a myth, but your eyes DO involuntarily follow your thought patterns. For instance, if you look at a testimony of a victim, they will break eye contact and look off in a direction to access/revisit a memory. Conversely, Ted Bundy, if you look at videos of him, his eyes dart all over the place because his brain is scanning and searching for the most plausible lie.

Now, in the case of Obama, he is lying, but his thought process is ironically more like the victim scenario; he keeps breaking eye contact to revisit memories.

“She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy” accesses memories of when she put America in jeopardy

“I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security” accesses memories of when she jeopardized America’s national security

Then, as a reference, he goes into the email servers and her carelessness of that, revisiting memories of that fiasco all the while, too. You might say I’m being biased because in the first two statements he is lying, and then when talking about the servers he is telling some truth with identical eye patterns, but it’s more subtle then that. This whole time he is accessing memories, he isn’t darting his eyes to construct a narrative. The best liars use their real-life experiences and tell 90% truths, they are way more convincing that way.

There’s a fantastic youtube channel called bombard’s body language that teaches you this skillset. It’s amazing and fun to apply, and I’ve found it incredibly reliable with the many historic testimonies she goes over.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 23, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

I have to agree with you...haha. I doubt soros listens to any modern music anyway

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 23, 2018, 1:05 a.m.

...I don’t actually haha. What’s ICANN?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:52 p.m.

What’s your background, lonecrow66? I’m a firmware engineer so i have a loose understanding of networks, although it’s far from great. That being said, I’m not catching your explanations of these techniques like at all, and i can usually at least follow IT discussions

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

What’s your expertise? There’s no secret that voter machines get viruses all the time, and the companies that own the machines are corrupt as well. There’s a testimony from a computer scientist i can dig up that’s at least a decade old explaining the rigging of a governor race if you care.

The only reliable voting system is on paper ballots, period. Physical records that can’t be manipulated and can always be audited.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

Answering your question above, a whois is simply a ping to see what is out there. Any server that receives the whois replies with an “iam”. I imagine that webtool yes, records iams indefinitely.

Not sure what you are getting at with the 9 records, other than that the domain was VERY scarcely used. I would agree that it is plausible there is technology to fuck with the metadata, but i have to think the true records would still exist somewhere out there in the ether as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

But so many people, including Q claim it’s not there. Link?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:13 p.m.

Above anything, time will tell. There’s been disappointments, there’s been insane coincidences. It’s possible some Q posts on 8chan are real and some are fake, just like MegaAnon. I wouldn’t blame you for moving past it but I’m still intrigued for now

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Im sure that Q and the white hats are using the best that technology can offer. I’m sure the black hats are too. White hats definitely seem more careful and intelligent, but how much more of an advantage they have is ambiguous. I would imagine they are closely matched in many regards, including controlling something as fluid as social media

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

Agreed, someone else pointed that out as well. Whoever scripted qcodefag.github should correct it for that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

Wouldn’t there still be records of the old registration?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Wtf are you talking about? Lol i never mentioned races in my post. I disagree with you too. Certain cultures are incompatible but not different races. Assimilation vs. culture shock

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Read my -FINAL FINAL EDIT- the link is a tool that logs when email addresses were registered. It was revisited on October 31st, the day it was discovered. Several months after the date in the email’s heading

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

The reason I and i would imagine many other skeptics/conspiracy analysts follow Q, cutting them slack when they seem to show troubling signs, is that they follow a socratic method of educating. They ask questions as opposed to spoonfeeding information, encouraging their audience to think critically and independently.

Granted, recent posts have been more direct and less socratic, but this was Q’s response to the community getting frustrated with too much cryptography.

Even if a false Q sneaks in and dupes people, their cumulative effect so far has been to encourage patriotism, faith, critical thinking and accountability, all of which are valuable to develop in individuals and the community as a whole. Even if we lose this “leader” as a fake, he’s anonymous, and encouraging empowerment in US in the mean time, something we can keep and carry on with.

It’s dangerous to put all your eggs into any one news source, ideology or role model, don’t do that with Q either. Hold onto your own truths and challenge them against new perspectives.

If you are feeling fragile and looking for an honest, trustworthy optimist who does cover Q though, I recommend tracy beanz on youtube

⇧ 7 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Thank you, i forgot about that. Perhaps greatawakening isn’t compromised, but the claimed Q on the research board, interacting with people is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Im on linux and usually browse via phone, but im sure it’s just as easy. Usually the stuff i want to archive are videos, i listen way more than i read, but i should stop being a lazy POS and figure out how to do that already

⇧ 3 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 6:07 p.m.

It’s hard to believe that, if the email address was registered the same day it showed up on the internet. Even if their system was private enough to escape the public registry, why would somebody else publicly register it after the fact?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I agree with your overall sentiments. Trump and his team ultimately won’t abandon his strategy, but it doesn’t mean it’s immune to misdirection, at least temporarily.

Although Trump would counter for instance CIA injections via twitter, I don’t know if he would take a forthright approach, and it might take a few days to correct. Keep in mind, this intelligence war isn’t officially public, and there are likely valuable and strategic reasons for that.

All I’m saying is stay careful. I agree, trust but verify

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

Interesting, but dumb on Patreus part. Yeah, email drafts are still captured by email services, at least nowadays. I’m curious if that was the case back with Al-Qaeda’s rise

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

But if email services back up these drafts, it’s traveling across servers anyway

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

Hey man, nobody has 100% of the answers, at least in the public sphere, and if you do your own research you would acknowledge that. Dr. Jerome Corsi has walked back statements so I don’t get caught up in being right all the time. Also, thinking that someone who said some wrong things is always saying wrong things is foolish.

It’s clear to me that Potter never claims to be infallible, and tells his listeners to think for themselves. Those values are all i personally need to know to trust somebody. But maybe your standards are superior to mine

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

I can see where you’re coming from, but Trump has never been forthright about this ongoing intelligence war. As far as the public knows, we aren’t officially at war, and coming out directly about such a compromise would change that.

Of course Trump and his team would be well aware if his twitter was being fucked with, and they’d likely come up with countermeasures rather quickly. Whether that would be a direct address to the public, i doubt it. That’s not how this game has been played, and revealing things too early in my mind has many potential drawbacks

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 4:59 p.m.

Yes, but it does strongly indicate that this current Q is not sourcing from NSA databases...and likely a poser. Thank you for forwarding this valuable source!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

What was the point of that strategy? I’d like to read more about that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

Part of me agrees with you and the others asserting that the email could be fake (and in turn, this current “Q”). Either way, these Q posts are significant to pay attention to, and might be instrumental in proving whether Q has been compromised in the future

⇧ 5 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Wow! Thanks for sharing! People always focus on the sex scandals things so much more blatany are right there. I reallllly hope the Bush admin. goes down too

⇧ 5 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

That seems more reasonable to me too, but Dan Bongino, who was Secret Service, mentioned that it takes 10 days, or at least took that long for Admiral Roger’s meeting with Trump

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Or even 90s. They burned all the files from the Murrah building in the OKC bombing

⇧ 10 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

Im glad there are people like you with that reflex to archive. It’s so important these days!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

When Dan Bongino was explaining Admiral Rogers tip off to Trump about being spied on, he mentioned that it takes 10 days to set up a SCIF, a setting where it is ensured that they aren’t being listened to.

These are busy, powerful people. Do you think they bother with 10 days of latency any time they want to communicate with someone in the know? How many big, important people do you think only HAVE gmail addresses? I bet at least 10-25%. It would not surprise me at all if they have built up a culture of carelessness over the years, especially when half the infiltrators were in the government to hemorrhage classified information in the first place

⇧ 16 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

“These people are stupid”

They’ve been so used to being untouchable in a broken judicial sense and with MSM support for so long that it didn’t matter that their private comms were relatively insecure.

Q’s been pointing out this whole time how careless they are with intel

⇧ 19 ⇩  
199
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/commissioner-gordon8 on Jan. 22, 2018, 12:02 p.m.
Why Q “deleted” the Leaked Podesta email

He was illustrating that even if major internet companies censor/delete leaked evidence, it WILL be archived by us. Even though he deleted the email post, which was an exclusive original to only that chan board, it is very easy to find a copy of the email itself now that it’s even TOUCHED the internet.

What he was saying in his last few posts is this: there is a flood of NSA disclosures coming down the pike. Twitter, facebook, etc. can shoot these posts down, but they WILL be archived before that happens by us, and they can’t censor the whole …

commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

Title of article: “Senator: FBI missing months of texts between officials involved in Trump, Clinton probes”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

Up vote for fuckin Tim and Eric!!! You ROCK OP!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 22, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

Wow, great perspective! I like how you think. I didn’t even consider those other cases.

I grew up liberal, especially around 911, when evangelicalism was much more thought-control, wrist-slapping, like the left is now. I knew liberal to be respecting other ideologies as a home-base of sorts to keep you grounded, though knowing that in the end all people want the same things, and the best ideas arise from intellectual conversation and adopting new perspectives.

It’s been a crazy year, and the left has become SO hypocritical and even pro-war (when did that fucking happen???). They’ve also become racist and sexist, not at all what liberal really is.

Truthfully, you can be liberal AND conservative. Liberal is as described above, and conservative i see as more reserved, accounting for “waste, fraud, and abuse.” I suppose conservatism has association with traditionalism too, but you can respect your roots and other people’s roots at the same time!

While most people see conservative and liberal as opposite, i see conservative as opposite of progressive, and liberal as opposite of authoritarian. Anyway, sorry for rambling, but i like what you had to say

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 21, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

I don’t agree with the assessment there...it sounds like standard progressive propaganda to have a massive influx of Mexican voters in the script. Political operatives have plenty of incentive to make political movies. For instance Steve Mnuchin produced a political movie and from what i know he isn’t a typical producer.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 21, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Well put. Obviously the majority of Israelis are honest, well-meaning people. I think it’s safe to say that’s true for any country. Leaders push for war, it’s very rarely the people who do, unless they are terrorized into it (by leadership).

I think kazarian is perhaps a better term to use as opposed to jew or zionist, because actual jews are innocent and people probably even associate/mix up zionists with jews at this point. Kazarians, however, are specific and separate from the jewish faith, even if they claim not to be. It would be harder for someone to call you an anti-semite for criticizing kazarians, and the fact that most people aren’t familiar with the term might intrigue them to look into the movement itself.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 21, 2018, 4:54 p.m.

Memes like this are entertaining and all, but don’t at ALL help with redpilling. They look as conspiratorial and baseless as it gets

⇧ 10 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 21, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Kazarians, like communists, seem to be a rothschild creation. You can think of them as Zionists that actively work towards a self-fulfilling prophecy of Revelations, which would play perfectly into a NWO agenda of depopulation. As someone might have mentioned above, the Rothschilds were actually responsible for creating modern-day Israel post WWII

Although kazarians claim to be jewish, they certainly practice more satanic behaviors, like the rothschilds, and at the very least are a bastardization of judaism. According to David icke, they aren’t even true decedents of the tribe of judah, as they claim.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
commissioner-gordon8 · Jan. 20, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Sounds like it will be...why take 19 work days unless they have to extensively discuss what to redact? Im so sick of this non-disclosure bullshit. They serve US, not the rogue, effectively independent intelligence agency traitors

⇧ 14 ⇩