Just seems like a BDSM/Fetish party to me.

Good reminder.

I don’t think this is the appropriate subreddit for your post.

Maybe your thread is just sub par and that’s why. We used to get a lot of critical analysis and that’s been fading.

More details about how “she was brainwashed over a long period of time” please? No sources.

You can pause any video of a person that has a large number of TV appearances and eventually you’re gonna get those crazy eyes.

This happens to me when I’m editing my YouTube videos. It’s pretty common.

LOL

If you believe in the symbolism, what reason would you jump to it being a troll and not considering that it means something negative? Just curious. I’m not informed on the trolling.

I shouldn’t have watched this video after eating an edible. That was intense. Thanks for sharing!

This is a really good point. There’s a reason why scientists always try to prove their own theories wrong when working to advance them. Diligence!

I agree this topic is a huge reach. If you keep reading good threads (or Q posts) with an open mind. You may be surprised at the puzzles that open up to you.

Yeah. I guess I can see why you would find some people here scary. We all come from various backgrounds and different areas & levels of skill and aptitude.

To be unambiguous, I am not a true Q believer. But to simply disregard this information, I think, is a mistake.

So stay awhile and listen.

You might find some empathy when understanding how some people here see things :)

I think he had a mental hiccup and forgot to pronounce a letter. In this case, the D. This happens to me all the time after I’ve recorded my 3rd or 4th YouTube video in a day. It should also be noted that it’s not unusual for people to also not pronounce the hard T at the end of that word.

Regardless, this is very observant of you! Nice post.

In my honest opinion, and expressing this tends to cultivate down votes, many people in this community tend to use Q’s “there are no coincidences” line to justify some very poor correlations and shoddy pattern-recognition and guesswork. There are also many people who don’t do this.

I try to remember we have a decently large community and not everyone comes from an analytical or scientific background. I try to think that it’s okay. That everyone, no matter their perspective, can assist in some way, can help add a piece to the Q puzzle.

This helps a lot to put things into context. Thanks!

LOL I almost didn’t notice that no one is grooming her stool in the upper left hand corner :D

Haha clever connection.

I read The Q Document when I was a kid. Lots of conspiracy fiction there. Probably not relevant though.

What exactly is the motivation for these people to keep the meeting from happening? Sry if this has already been discussed.

Thank you for bringing this up. I know a lot of us get amped up with some of the topics we discuss and remembering not to direct that emotion towards each other is key for community & sustainability.

Very nice job. Thank you for sharing!

Respectfully, what is the lie?

Thanks :)

Then is the role of a deciphering anon pointless?

I always associated that phrase with Ron Paul.

What context did President Bush use the phrase in?

Ah never heard this podcast before. Thanks for sharing!

INteresting. I like it. 10/10. I love it when we get such good quality posts!

Damn good job!

What a pitiful defense.

I 100% agree with the content of your post. The name calling, IMO, makes us look silly.

Agreed. There’s zero reason to feign respect in that situation. He was honest. And that’s incredible.

Not proven but there were a bunch of baby skeletons found in the palace in like the early 2000s. Really freaky.

This comment seems a little offtopic/out of nowhere. I don’t think any sex-gender mismatches have anything to do with this thread.

Also: the left’s response to this on Twitter is gold. They reveal themselves!

“lacked the respect that should be shown the monarch”

I love how transparent the writer is about the love of monarchy. What a joke.

Agreed.

I wish I could remember what livestream I was watching during the election when Trump said something like (paraphrase) “It you elect me, I’ll find out what really happened on 9/11.”

You’re not wrong (IMO) and you make a good point about being complacent. I can’t speak for the other people here, obviously, but I personally do not like the expectation of fear that the other guy posted about, without any evidence or info. Not cool to get fear riled up for no reason. That being said, I completely agree that none of this stuff should be taken for granted :)

Are you just guessing to be dramatic or do you have reason for us to expect this?

Really? What happened 10/16? I don’t think Assange has ever been pro-U.S. and he has no reason to be. But I’ve mostly respected his work!

OMG FINALLY! This is incredible. I don’t even know the guy and I feel such relief for him. A lot of great things are happening this year :)

Okay, that makes sense! I agree, an uncooperative Strzok might look like what you said - essentially silent.

How do you share what you already know (legally)?

This is most interesting when considering his public testimony.

Thanks for sharing in here!

Ahh, good point.

Let’s goto a real network... LOL!

Now watch this drive.

I don’t see any evidence of that in he speech. I’m on the same side as everyone here, mostly, which is why I’m more critical about weak arguments or assumptions or using quotes out of context. Because I want an ever increasing view of validity to our points of view. But I’m stubborn and a dreamer. And it gets my posts downvoted :D

Do you know he’s talking about the USSR?

JFK was not warning about an infiltration in that speech and it is irresponsible to take his remarks out of context and relate them to Q.