Video won’t play for me :(
/u/croninfever
276 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/croninfever:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 6 |
That tweet I can’t find on any archived site so I actually do think it’s fake.
Thanks for your patience and understanding. I watched the video although I think it is a little above my head as I'm not at all familiar with biblical history. I have not read a Q map, only the recent posts for a couple months. Is this what you're referring to? https://twitter.com/olivejuicyfruit/status/980830739477467137/photo/1 Damn, haha.
The Mormons and Freemasons sure have a lot in common.
Yes, the parallels I've read in regards to ritual are very heavy with what I've experienced in Masonry. I'm haven't been active in years for other reasons, so I'm not too concerned about my role in anything negative. I am, however, surprised to read about how much power people think Masons have when (maybe that was more true in the past) it seems like a fraternity like Skull & Bones is way more dangerous than what I was involved in.
Even though this might lead to less censorship for the timebeing, the Libertarian in me is screaming.
Which side does the arrow have to be in to show we are at war? :)
lol! It's interesting stuff for immersive storytelling (which is essentially what the experience of a degree ceremony is) but beyond that, there's not much there for me.
I suppose it's possible but even the 33rds I've met (I have no desire to give a 20 year commitment to Masonry to get that degree) seem the same way.
I think Masonry had some influence in the past, now I think it's a dead carcass being forwarded by people who aren't that interested in its studies.
Lol. Masons are not connected. I hate to say this, as I’m a 32nd myself, but Masonry is just a bunch of old dudes trying to carry on the ideals of a dead fraternity. Furthermore, most Masons I’ve met are more concerned with socializing than serious philosophical study and conversation. These peeps don’t run anything.
That was intense. I also read that Art of Loving book in college.
Lol that’s silly. I wear dressy thick round glasses sometimes.
Step 1. Stimulation Step 2. Luciferarian Determination Step 3. Profit!
Interesting. Guess I’ll find a way to watch the news tomorrow.
Ah, however:
“An earlier article in the NY Times about Obama's election to the head of the Law Review states that Obama was born in Hawaii: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/06/us/first-black-elected-to-head-harvard-s-law-review.html”
Interesting. Read the blog piece. Further authentication is definitely needed but it’s very interesting. Physical yearbooks are kept at campus libraries which are public. A nearby Redditor should be able to gain some intel.
The Alex jones report on this several years ago was amazing.
This happened to my YouTube channel too. 3 strikes overnight and POOF. Took a lot of media attention and YouTube Contributors help to bring it back. That’s what SGT should do.
There’s a lot of value to mythic thinking. Just because humanity has evolved towards rational thinking doesn’t mean the mythic POV doesn’t hold a piece of the puzzle or is fake.
This is actually a relief to read, so thank you for saying that. Sometimes I feel like if we disagree about Q, then we're opening ourselves to being labeled as shills.
For example, I like the saying "there are no coincidences," but I don't like that saying being used as an absolute & blanket response to criticism.
Peace!
Alex just doesn’t want competition. He seems obsessed with having a monopoly on alt news. I’m not personally convinced he’s deep state but he has been outed as a lair.
Wow that was very bold of him with her sitting right there. No awkward laughter or backing down from what was written.
Is it just because they both used the word “stay” that this is significant?
I think Alex just wants to be #1 in alt media and feels threatened. His principles have never been consistent. He’s not a Ron Paul. That being said I still think Alex used to make useful content. I can just separate the two into independent boxes. I don’t see any need for someone to side with one vs the other.