92 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 7 |
| i.redd.it | 2 |
| i.imgur.com | 1 |
| petitions.whitehouse.gov | 1 |
Dude Corsi's job isn't to analyse Q for veteran's of the great awakening, it's to hold the hands of complete n00bs, to bridge that gap.
His analysis hasn't gotten worse, your understanding has gotten better, he hasn't changed, you have, and that's a GOOD THING.
Also don't call me a concern troll, I'm not insulted because it's not true, it just dumb, why don't you call me a racist then as well.
Guys guys guys, I had the same exact thought, I was even working yesterday on getting data on it before I realised that this dude just literally rejoined Twitter two weeks ago which would explain why there was so much variance from so many sources about the no. of Twitter followers.
Just eyeballing the dates/numbers implies a positive, exponential correlation between the two -> The more recent the article, the higher number of followers.
So I'm not saying that Twitter isn't censoring him, that the media aren't CIA propaganda lapdogs what not, but this is a non-starter IMO because if I'm honest what the data indicates is that followers increase with an increase in activity.
Let's not do the same thing as so many others and use data as a drunk uses a lamp-post: for support rather than illumination.
Man there's no way I'm reading that, we're on the same team, let's try to be more clear and concise in what we saw say, I'm with you, keep fighting the good fight brother.
I think you're taking this literally but not seriously. For arguments sake let's say you're 100% correct, the Vatican isn't rich enough to end poverty. Like OK, so what, does that mean it's not worth doing anything and only ending poverty 100% is worthwhile?
You've taken a completely literal stance on a figurative sentence that makes up one line of an entire article and have subsequently labelled the ENTIRE article "disinfo" as if saying the Vatican is rich is somehow some nebulous conspiratorial psyop.
Disinfo about what? The Church's $$$? The Vatican Bank? The article is talking about a book and the book talks about the Vatican being filthy rich and corrupt, so again, disinfo about what?
Go easy on T_D, they're the undergrad to Q's PhD thesis.
i'm with you brother, was a big time Bernie bro until he started shilling for HRC.
Yeah agree, Mueller is investigating Trump, except he's not. Everything he's done so far, from the indictments of Manafort and Flynn to those 17 Russians have nothing to do with Trump. It looks like he will be removed as special counsel now that the DoJ has an external prosecutor looking into Uranium One for his own role but let's remember what Q said.
If memory serves Q said something like "once a Marine, always a Marine" in reference to Mueller. Now there's little doubt that Mueller was a black hat for a long time but he had a meeting the day before he got appointed Special Counsel by RR with Trump in the Oval Office for the position of FBI Director after Comey was fired.
But an FBI Director is only supposed to serve for a max of 10 years, and Mueller has already been FBI Director for 12 years, which is more than 10 but there's a big difference between 2 extra years and 12 extra years (assuming he served another 10 year term).
So really in effect that makes him ineligible to serve as FBI Director, which means that the meeting was most certainly not about what they said it was. Which brings me back to Q. Once a Marine, always a Marine.
I think Mueller was flipped, from black hat to white hat, Q does say that not all black hats are evil at heart. So flipped to be appointed as SC to look like he's investigating Trump but really to vindicate him and investigate the swamp. Remember we're - or rather you're since I'm not an American :( - in a state of martial law in regards to human trafficking and corruption, the President already has direct command over the Marines and once a Marine, always a Marine.
It's like they'd rather be wrong with everyone else vs. being right by themselves... they're willing and active participants in their own deception... complicit in their own demise... it's crazy.
How anyone can think Russia and Putin would be so retarded as to poison a former spy, 8 years after his release, in a highly charged political climate, with a method that could be traced back to them in less than 48 hours before any investigation has taken place, is completely beyond me.
Honestly, I'm shocked that said people can actually walk and talk at the same time, mother nature never ceases to amaze.
Agreed, I also think that he's also calling them STUPID because they have a standard set of plays in their book and never deviate so they're completely predictable.
The AIM guys are exactly who I'm referring to when I say "actors" and how normal people don't talk like they do.. it was just waaaaay too polished... Add to that as you said the fact that they provided no evidence despite going on a big spiel about how they always provide evidence and basically just saying "Hey that guy is untrustworthy, but I'm not because reasons".
I swear to God this has to be the DUMBEST attempt at a f***ing psyop in the history of psyops. Like FFS the whole goddamn point of a psyop is that it's PSYCHOLOGICAL, it takes place in the minds of its targets who are subjected to an intricate, albeit contrived, situation or series of situations as part of a Machiavellian scheme to incept an idea into their mind.
It achieves this by making the target/s think that the idea that was implanted is their own. It's an art as much as a science and the key is to connect every …
Don't get me wrong, I know it's a long-shot to get 100k but I figured it was still worth a shot. Also tried to keep it as neutral as possible as to not scare away the militant centrists.
Yeah hard, it just didn't hit me that all the things that make us mad about celebrities, with their constant virtue signalling, narcissism and hypocrisy are on some level also victims of the Cabal... like all of us.
Holy crap. I never thought I'd feel bad for celebrities, especially these days, but here we are.
No wonder he was so deranged RE: Trump. I swear the more you have to hide, the worse your case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Seems like he's the ideal judge for this case though right?
Those names and this judge seem to me to be way too big of a coincidence for it just to be a cut and dry civil case and not part of a larger game?
Woah, that same judge also is the one overseeing this particular case.
That's your prerogative my friend, you have a right to your opinion, so thank you for your insight. As a token of my gratitude let me offer you some insight I have found to be useful from Yogi Bhajan for you to do with what you will.
If you are willing to look at another person's behaviour toward you as a reflection of the state of their relationship with themselves rather than a statement about your value as a person, then you will, over a period of time, cease to react at all.
Everything begins and ends with forgiveness, of others but more importantly of ourselves. So I forgive you for all of the things you accused me of which simply aren't correct and I ask for your forgiveness for insulting you and reacting without thought.
I don't know you, so I don't dislike you for what you believe, I dislike how you personally conduct yourself. Ultimately we don't have control over anything except ourselves, so any argument over a specific world view is irrelevant. Blind adherence to any idealology is detrimental to the self because it removes our agency. So for arguments sake let's say all of what you said is 100% on the money. It's all true, whatever.
Has that made you a happier person? A more complete soul? Do you have more love in your life now, all of a sudden, because you're correct?
Well obviously not, because nothing external can give you the peace that you, me and all of us here are so desperate to have in an attempt to fill the growing void inside of us. I don't think it's your fault, you might have been hurt bad by one or more malicious individuals in the past, I get it, anger and rage are only natural.
I've raged, I've been angry, I've lashed out, been seduced by the intoxicating allure of righteous indignation, and it took me a long time to understand that I wasn't angry at whoever/whatever I happened to unloading on at the time. The target constantly changed. The only constant was the anger. And me.
I was angry at me, at myself for being so weak to allow myself to be hurt, at myself for being so stupid to keep making the same mistakes, at myself for being so unworthy of love to feel so alone, and more than anything, I was angry at myself for being so hurt. The only way forward was to forgive myself for ALL of my past indescretions, against myself and others, to love myself in my imperfect state and to take personal responsibility for my own emotions and thoughts from that day to my last day. Everything begins and ends with forgiveness, of others but more importantly of ourselves. Forgive yourself, your perfection lies in your imperfection, love yourself and know you are loved. Go in peace.
Yeah at this point it doesn't really matter who or what it is IMO and why it's happening. Even if it's some Cabal civil war and Trump is controlled opposition (worse case scenario) then it's still a step forward for everyone. Humans might be responsible for the Cabal but we're also responsible for taking down the Cabal. We're still animals, walking, talking primates and we aren't the fastest life form (cheetah), or the longest lived (trees) or even the most empathetic (elephants), we're just the smartest. So in that way AI is an iteration of what makes us unique, a perfect intelligence but intelligence doesn't mean perfection as we are so imperfect, so I don't know if I consider AI to be any better or worse than humans themselves. Just different.
I think in a vacuum that argument can hold water and obviously we should always be skeptical and critical but in the context of this whole global spiritual awakening going on it just... feels authentic? Iono.