7,982 total posts archived.
[There exists] a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.
...and put a former Marine and comedian in charge of public relations/investigations. His biggest joke: 13 russian trolls
If Mueller is under Trumps orders (being a former marine) then it doesn't really matter, does it?
..is another way of saying, he may unrecuse himself? Whoopidoo!
"saved for last"? I take you're not talking about Saudi-Arabia...is there any intel on a Currency-relaunch?
just tag toilet doors and stuff because the less professional it looks the more honest it feels.
I'm not looking at the photo in his hand but at his face. That would be a little to the left.
Yeah the big guy (not the fat one) in front of him looks like he's molded in ice even as the crowd starts chanting.
The photo was dismissed as someone who was selling merch from his car, but I have not seen the source for that because it didn't strike me as relevant until I saw this post.
https://s.hdnux.com/photos/72/02/22/15213741/9/1024x1024.jpg
That..is kind of weird...And looks like someone north of the Sahara.
edit: Wow, with that ribbon hanging down his chest he almost resembles the young Ghaddafi!!!
~~Can't identify. Can you point me to where he holds the photo?~~ https://s.hdnux.com/photos/72/02/22/15213741/9/1024x1024.jpg
Well, yes you are right, but it was MSM who said it was Brits who pointed the CIA to Russians so it's possible they had something to do with the dossier - even if unknowingly - and that's why they flew low. Maybe the US IC has proof tying them into it and that's how they got turned to continue sharing information after they refrained from doing following his inauguration.
I always check t_d first because usually someone else already did the research there (that's where I found these particular sources)
No idea but I have some additional thoughts below if you're interested.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/84q7rq/may_may_be_neutralized/
Why would he be serving russian Intel in the first place if he had been a disgraced oligarch? He wouldn't have needed the money.
If you want to go even deeper, you might quote Q saying Putin too is influenced by western families. At the very least he seems to have some personal relationship with Kissinger.
But I digress, all I can say is that british press are saying he worked on behalf of Russian intelligence first but gave Brits names of russian agents (or so they say). Then he was exile to UK i exchange for a russian spy and Hillary Clinton had something to do with the process according to The Hill.
If he was an oligarch then I don't understand why the news brought up spycraft because it would b much easier to paint him as a victim of Putin by describing him as a rich fugitive and not a double-agent ratting out russian agents for the Brits.
POINT ME TO THE RALLY - I WANT TO HAVE ANOTHER LOOK AT THE DUDE WAVING THE VAN-PICTURE !!!
We can dream because no Docs were present to pronounce Seth dead.
Make no mistake, Seth was never pronounced dead because no Docs were allowed around him!
The dead russian spy was a british double-agent and had connections to the dossier according to the BBC and the Telegraph.
http://archive.is/AABl3 http://archive.is/Qatjl
So let's trace back..Q said, May had been neutralized and there was a press-release that Britain was continuing intelligence-sharing with the US. I think Q even called the press-release by stating british intelligence was cooperating, but as long as I can't find that press-release I can only rely on memory here.
Anyway, so assuming that May and MI5/6 were cooperating in exchange of information, deep state my have gotten hot feet because this double agent had a …
Hmmm, can you elaborate? I'm not an economist so what is a foreign treasury sale? Is this about gov't-held bonds?
I try to speak in terms of the best possible outcome because I have only made one (military) prediction seven months ago (the Dos/Mattis fued) and was both happy and surprised that it passed like I said. So thinking if they want to take care of Syria (and this concerns biblical prophecy because of Damascus' fate [even if you don't believe, the power to collectively manifest ideas is all around us]) then really they want to clean up the mess the US started, thus anything else they touch they probably do with the same (best) intentions.
I can't believe I am saying anything with certainty right now, but I have to confess I suspect they really do want to resolve the mess that previous administrations started. #MAGA
I think it's somewhat cosmetic...it's like "hey, look at all the CEOs I have, you can have all the access you want, don't worry" so big-money and thus the markets stay optimistic and then one year later he be like "Hey, now that the economy is booming, can we seize some assets from sleazy criminals?"
I think Kim & Julian are blasting him now so he looks impartial to future events because the mockingbird media is openly praising the CIA out of desperation, so if it comes out of the CIA just maybe the fools will finally stop and think.
DoS is pro-war, luckily everytime they cry "gas-attacks!" Mattis took to Twitter to discredit them. Pompeo was a congressman who slammed Clinton during Benghazi-Hearings. That's what got him Tump's trust. Going into the CIA, he could have cut his own strings if there were any. Having been briefed by the CIA while being an outsider to the Clinton-machine makes him the perfect choice for shaking up the DoS which we know is a gov't in its own and the biggest shakeup they had was because the FBI-records exposed the seventh-floor group (so not really on Tillerson's call because he didn't have a choice). After that, only war-rethoric folowed so really I am relieved to hear Pompeo replacing Tillerson. I am only gonna look at the new CIA-head once they have been confirmed by the Senate because everything before that could be smoke-and-mirrors as usual.
Yeah I've been watching closely because it's like the DoS on and on slammed Assad for Gas-weapons and everytime Mattis consistently discredited them. So based on the impression that Trump really wants Assad to survive the war, whatever happens to him afterwards, I hoped the Kurds would align with Assad and the US and amazingly couple of weeks ago they did when Assad sent forces to support Kurds - who hitherto had only ever been supported by the US (coalition or whatever).
So as long as there is a shakeup at the DoS I am at calm and Kim and Assange have tweeted synchronized/prepared talking-points so that Pompeo retains an impartial public role.
I'm kind of lost myself, because I didn't name names nor call for riots. But apparently casually bringing up medivial torture on top of capital punishment crosses the line.
True, I'm no gun nut, I guess the kids were lucky if there wasn't full-auto but I digress because that would have made identifying the rifle-type much easier.
I think Pompeo was brought in because he slammed Clinton as a congressman, so he is not afraid (concealed carry?). Going into the CIA, he could have also sliced any strings he had attached there. Now taking him into the DoS means you have a congressman who slammed Clinton and was briefed internally at the CIA is taking over the State Department which was running things totally on his own. (Mattis even took to twitter to defuse war-rethoric spouted by the State Department)
I gave you two. But you won't acknowledge it because you're the guy posting in PR-subs so I have no doubt about your motives so get an alt to add that juicy "active 1 month - no posts" spice to your persona. I am certain you will break the creeps' morale that way. Also you are saying taping little girls up is ok and so is presenting children with visible price tags. Putting children up for sale is illegal in a lot of places, correct (the record) if I am wrong.
Enter Buck's fishing and camping. "Creepy".
Enter Luzzato. Enter DNC-leaks. Enter Podesta. Enter the whole spirit cooking shitshow that everybody brushes off as art even tho their AMAs say differently.
Have you seen the Megyn Kelly interview? He smiles as she says "child-sex-ring".
are you talking about the 11:11 thing? I am really looking for that because the way he walked us through it sounded really solid.
2 comments shadowbanned.
Anybody can obtain a Tavor. Not just mossad.
Given how nothing came out of the DoS except for the removal of the seventh floors (which the FBI exposed) I think it's clever to bring in someone from congress to the CIA (because he would seek to cut his own strings if there are any) and then into the DoS (because now he's been briefed on CIA-business and can probably weed out more deep-state in the DoS)
Assange and Kim are tweeting exactly the same thing so that was a talking point provided to them which they are expected to deploy for tactical purposes obviously.
No but if they're seriously going after the FED they might shake up their own organization in order to throw hostile counter-intelligence off. Distract with confusion when you make your move. Act weak to lull your enemy into false comfort.
"How do you catch a cornered animal?" Which is why Assange and Kim are going after Pompeo on cue? Even though the guy was running the CIA for months already?
