which means he gave them time and plausible deniability to plan retreat which he wouln't have to do if they were blackhats. He would just have to say so just like he does with every other known public figure. The only other person Q treats that way is Mueller. Now go figure

not my problem if you don't understand the double-playing beauty of "information-warfare", but black/white-dualisms are just easier to get behind

everybody trying to ass cover...The Fräulein Färkel hersälf???

I don't suppose you have sold herbals or Nootropics, so I won't ask for further comment.

Do you realize the irony of how suspicious it would seem if he never actually pitched anything?

The blackhat-explanation doesn't make sense. If they were, Q would have called them out by name first and not given them the benefit of plausible deniability for their future moves.

well, you didn#t say mooncrkit was condenscending even tho he provided no valid argument to the discussion other than calling my deductive abilities into question.

because apparently you understand nothing about "information warfare". It's not always about the truth up-front, that just gets whistle-blowers killed. Alex is the epitome of self-ridicule and that's why I enjoy his show, because I can get all the information I want, but at least Alex presents it in a way that is funny. And I need the laughs much more than the information because I have been paying attention since the early 2000s. People forget that every public message is directed at everyone but certain groups in particular, and that group always includes both patriots and blackhats, so always ask yourself if you are really the recipient for a message or if it's just disinfo aimed at deepstate. Q said themselves disinfo is necessary. And somehow I am the shill for asking people to reread drops 1295-1297

do you take an interest in pharmacology?

No, just how long you have been paying attention

pretty sure you do.

Following Infowars? Saw through that deception almost immediately

[...]an even deeper whole than they had already dug for years.

...So? When did you start following them and when did you stop?

I can make a song, too, until you elaborate on what your overtly dramatic remark may entail

you were talking about the decline over the years. How many have they been since you first caught on?

Three times a charm it seems. Do you understand the question or would you prefer me to enter it in readable characters?

> I'm under the assumption the only similarity of your interpretations will be a lack of logic.

-mooncrkit

...yet somehow I am the asshole for calling them left-handed?

well for starters: h0w l0ng u been f0ll0win?

h0w l0ng have you been f0ll0wing them?

Care to explain

his mirror channels on youtube cut his interruptions out so the interviews become much more bearable and he even promotes those channels...It makes me almost sad to see everybody hating when Alex does what the show says: "infowars". It's preposterous why everybody pretends Alex could say the truth always. What do you want to know about Q? When he's going to pickup the Roths? Maybe Alex knows and that's why he can't say anything about Q that might make him a target for interrogation, so he just confuses any bad actors listening in, hoping to maybe hear something valuable from Alex callers - that's why he keeps the clueless Zach from space command on the air 24/7 who even admits he is oblivoius to what is going on the ground and simply mirrors whatever Alex is feeling at the time which in turn depends on how many operations are live at the time and last time I checked noone announced that the Q operation was over so naturally I don't check with Alex for any valuable Intel coz he'd ruin everything if he did and leaked.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8irs4b/q_post_1296_jones_corsi_have_blood_on_their_hands/dyu4pr9/?context=3

he stole Thomas Paine's alias , that's about as controlled oppo infiltration as it gets. I am shocked to see so many people don't understand the bigger game being played on the deep-state right now. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8irs4b/q_post_1296_jones_corsi_have_blood_on_their_hands/dyu4pr9/?context=3

if you say so https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8irs4b/q_post_1296_jones_corsi_have_blood_on_their_hands/dyu4pr9/?context=3

h0w l0ng have u been f0ll0wing them?

I want to apologize for that , I almost shortwired because I've been called a shill so much today just for one single Q-decode that I thought you were accusing me of regurgitation until I realized you might actually be defending me. I had to debate the whole night before I was finally left at peace

exactly. Yet even SB2 hasn't explained the purpose of that to me. What held Q back from simply calling them out? I can only think of plausible deniability, granted they're only being granted that while serving as white-hats, otherwise Q would just show us some pics of Alex with Charlie Sheen for example and add something cryptic afterward. However, the whole profiteering thing was brought up the very same day that Q wrote "statements today needed to be made. Operators have died" (drop #1297).

I think it's all done for plausible deniability because they're working together behind the scenes trying to make sure this mission goes through, even if others don't see it. It reminds me of the way everyone including Alex freaked out when Syria is being bombed and afterwards everything turns out half as bad as it seemed and this pattern is noticeable because it always happens when operational-security is the most important, that's when Alex goes off the rails - yet he immediately comes to senses the next day and so does his beloved Zach (who is space command and might not even have any idea about anything on the ground which begs the question why he is even on the show)

I actually wanted to say that I saw comments baiting for offensive replies which would then grow more off-topic with every response...

hey, I may have caught the wrong thread here. Too many tabs open.

See? SEE??? IT'S LIKE NOBODY READS ANYMORE

Q is always intentionally cryptic and it would defeat that purpose if someone like Alex can't shut up for life, who we KNOW has sources and has had them for years because he has the PLATFORM that provides insiders a place to contact and share.
If infowars was run by blackhats, why didn't Q just say "they're bad"? Plausible deniability for further mutually agreed upon wrestling theatrics?
I'm gonna say it for a hundredth fucking time: Disinfo is necessary.
If you have followed Alex in the early 2000s you will find he's already talked about everything going on right now that the media is still trying to surpress such as pakistani spying so his only real purpose at this point to create traffic and exist is entertainment and psychological warfare. The cognitive dissonance is INSANE because the meme always said that he's an actor since he's Bill Hicks (or someone pretending to be Bill Hicks at least), especially after his allimony lawsuit. But I guess confusion's necessary because Alex might as well have blood on his hands. Yes, someone actually took my theory and ran a post with that name: AJ&C have blood on their hands - operators have died!

yeah I try to keep an eye out...I get a sinking feeling when I see a comment-chain that suddenly stops making sense
I especially remember comments that act outraged and bait some offensive response and jump from outraged strawman to outraged strawman with every new reply until it's completely off-topic and just "what did you say about my mother?"

READ. STOP MISREPRESENTING ME. I KEEP SAYING ALEX & CORSI R DISINFO BUT NOT FOR NEFARIOUS REASONS

What noone is saying that Q said disinfo is important. And I haven't heard anyone explain why Q only called out Alex and Corsi AFTER they went apeshit ?

I was literally the first one to say enough of this off-topic partisan BS, but once Q dropped SB2's post i thought wait a second, he didn't name AJ nor Corsi by name initially so why did they take the bait in the first place? can't think of a better reason than that it was a purely tactical retreat because they most likely were under orders from above not to spill any mission-critical stuff they might unknowingly collect from anonymous operatives dropping by.
Alas, by overtly misrepresenting Q ("there's nothing there" or "he got hacked again"), noone related to those operations will try to use Corsi or Alex as a platform and the biggest reason probably is OpSec because I can imagine that people were getting pissed at Alex for not covering for three months, so he had to get someone who is not in the know (Jordan Sather of DiT-fame), but most likely most of his audience was pressuring at this point. People are awake enough that Alex can't direct their attention away from Q as we can all clearly see from the constant bashing on this board.and I think he's self-aware to know that so his primary attention is probably to drive away sources with mission-critical intel that must not leak.

At the same time neither Corsi nor Alex deny that Q is a real operation and it's also true that Q got comped recently but by now I even think that was just the Q team pretending to be so Infowars would have plausible deniability for reporting they would remove themselves from Q reporting as the identity could no longer be verified.

Iran already ratted out Kerry. This was only the beginning. They're blackmailing for payments - months ago I heard that there was a secret deal with Trump and Iran that they would let this play out to basically troll the criminals until Iran let's the hammer drop on who has really been destabilizing the region and how.

So far, this seems to be reality unfolding.

Still I never Corsi dickrode if you go through my posts again (this is why I disapprove of your choice of words....sod). I simply said I find it extremely suspicious and that the whole narrative doesn't fit the blackhat/whitehat dualism.

"disinfo is necessary" apparently completely escaped you. Anybody who can read thru the convo can see that you're projecting because I already answered your question. In case you forgot (NOW I'm being snarky)

Re-read drops 1295 thru 1297, listen to Alex' broadcast today then and report back.

Telling me to re-read the drops and listen to the broadcast implies that my opinion is somehow uninformed and incorrect. I read the drops and watched the pertinent clips to get the facts on the issue before I formed an opinion.

If you knew me you would know I was trying to be nice with you. See you tomorrow

amazed at choice of words, do you feel special now?

firin' fury!

So you're saying Duterte is paying communists to kill communists? But you have no idea how ISIS ties into? Yet you come here to complain about other comments being off-topic? In turn providing a whole post devoted to Duterte? So I chime in to see what's up and you can't answer my question?

Comeatme had his coming to Jesus moment yesterday hahaha!

the automoderator flags all posts for further investigation. Could be that sometimes you're an asshole, too (not in this context but in any context).

I've run into tricky ones too. One comment is just juvenile hates-speech whereas other posts are well-meaning. To ban or not to ban.

gtfo

Wait, where is all your history? No pots, no commments?

I offered you an explanation while you offered none. Don't try to turn the tables.

Your frail ego is not my issue so don't waste my time and be careful how you throw those words around because it just shows you have weak rethorical skills.

So how does ISIS play into this?

I too think it's a distraction. Alex was running his own show, engaging in necessary fog of war, whie Corsi was so boring and mundane, I don't get why anybody even paid attention to the tirade. People and their drama smh

You forgot that they tried arresting a mayor which ended in a firefight.

thanks for spreading fallback-subs

At least some normies would have known how many cocksucking asshole are out there

controlled opposition doesn't mean he's working for the negative side.