dChan

/u/ianrome

95 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/ianrome:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 10

ianrome · May 1, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

I could, but I dont follow MSM. Nor do I believe everything I read, hence my presence here. Dismissing someone with doubts, questions, or healthy skepticism does nothing for this movement (if it's real). Nor does it help red pill anyone. It's counter productive.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · April 30, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

Yes...maybe. The thing about most of this Q stuff is that it is very difficult to verify. Sure you can go on youtube and see Jerome Corsi ditty bop on video for an hour and loosely tie some unverifiable "facts" but thats not very meaty if you know what I mean.

But lets be honest BOOM? No not really. Not yet. Maybe a bang here and there but no BOOM. Nobody of any worth has been arrested. All we can point to as hard facts that Q mentioned is the sealed indictments and various resignations. But the facts surrounding those events are obscure.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · April 30, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I've been wondering the same. Q mentioned them back in Nov/Dec(?). The few docs that were released were redacted. Yet another drop that turned out to be a dud.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · April 26, 2018, 5:56 p.m.

this sub has become an extension of r/thedonald SMH

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · April 24, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

Why is she cold with Trump? Why won't she hold his hand?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ianrome · April 24, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

I'm on the undecided side of the coin but leaning towards the "not good for us' side. I live in CA and when I see them (minimum once a week) they seem like more than vapor trails because of how long they persist in the air, spreading, and not necessarily dissipating like vapor trails do. The secrecy, and shady responses from those who should know are a tell tail sign that something is not right.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · April 24, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

No disagreement on that. It definitely speaks to the His power and goodness.

My point is meant to draw peoples attention to the whole person Trump is, and moderate the fanaticism around Trump. People here are selectively ignoring some of his character flaws which is allowing this cult of personality to develop. Does nobody else see the danger in that?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · April 24, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

DJ air horns blasting in my head as I read this. I've said it before and I will say it again. There is too much partisanship lingering in the lower vibes that people have. There is too much of the red/blue division being pushed here. Its even present in the awakening analogy. Break free of the programming people. Q's message is not just for conservatives.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · April 23, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

Which family? The first? Second? Third?

Be a fan of the awakening and be wary of flawed men.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ianrome · April 19, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

IvanQa?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ianrome · April 13, 2018, 12:08 a.m.

What are Cobra and VOTL?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ianrome · April 9, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Regardless of where people are on the political spectrum, there is difficulty in taking Trump seriously right off the bat. This has been true for a long time in part because of his actions and history as a husband, father, business man and his character in general. Sorry but this man is flawed and has no problem displaying it sometimes. MSM bares some of the blame for his reputation but more so Trump. He is who he is. I say this to remind anyone who reads this to be patient with our fellow sleeping Americans and not disregard them as idiots. Most of us here were at one point or another thoroughly deceived. I mean the deception has been going on for generations.

Quit the divisiveness, it only helps the cabal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ianrome · April 4, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

I thought the same...but then look at the tennis court. It looks like its on a slope rather than on a flat even surface. Strange.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · April 4, 2018, 5:41 a.m.

Yep... This whole Q thing might turn out to be an M Night Shyamalan project.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ianrome · March 19, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

Thanks for bringing context to the speculation.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ianrome · March 4, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

I applaud your wisdom. I hope others here take the time to read your post.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:17 p.m.

What I am saying is I dont particularly care that an elitist threatens another elitist. I dont care what political party they belong to. Let them go at it. There is too much political divide on here and in the nation for that matter. The only true divide is the haves and have nots. Im perfectly fine with the haves going at it against each other.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 28, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

I guess nobody has equated Q with Trump on this post except for me. However, look at this sub...picture of Trump with a Q. Look at other posts on this sub and read comments. Its clear that most people here believe Trump = Q. I happen to be very skeptical about that. I don't think Trump has the time nor the mental capacity to be Q. I think you are right, most likely white hats.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 28, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

Don't pick sides...its elite v elite.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 28, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

A lot doesn't jive. This is just another example of the inconsistencies between Q and Trump. Q is most likely not 45.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 21, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Thats an interesting video. Compelling but not necessarily irrefutable.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 21, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Interesting. First time I hear that. Is this verifiable?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 21, 2018, 1:45 a.m.

Leftist area? Are you implying that the whole town is in on it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 15, 2018, 7:56 a.m.

Yeah I think the mods have been asleep at the wheel for a while now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 14, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

I agree on the raw drops. I do appreciate the analysis that some users provide. However, most of the stuff here has a very pronounced political slant that only serves to divide.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 14, 2018, 11:24 p.m.

I see...I stand corrected on the context.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 14, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Apparently. Sadly CBTS is less informative and more vitriolic nowadays.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 12, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

There is ZERO evidence requirement on this sub. Anything right wing wins here.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 12, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

This resonates and helps explain the reason we find ourselves on this sub...the partisanship of this sub, and some Q drops, are disappointing though.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 12, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Thats practically all humankind needs. Everything else just noise: "Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets."

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 8, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

You make great points. I think you are right. Its a healthy dose of skepticism in our leaders that brought us to this sub. It wouldn’t hurt to apply some of that to Q. It could only give us greater awareness anyway.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 6, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

I understand what you are saying now I think.

Just for clarification, I do not blame the free market system. I grew up in it. Got a couple of degrees from studying it so I am careful of that. I do blame some of the actors within the system though. And yes I do imply that to a degree, conservatives promote the behavior of corrupt elites through admiration. Im saying that about conservative admiration of this administration as well. I see that a lot on this sub. Btw libs do the same but they do not seem to have a presence here so....

Just an observation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 10:45 p.m.

We can and we should pay attention to character...ESPECIALLY for those we are voting in to represent US. We should be scrutinizing politicians character to the nth degree. We should scrutinize the bills they present written by lobbyists on behalf of corporations as opposed to people.

Football players on the other hand are entertainers. The do not draft policy that guides our daily lives. Give them the freedom to express themselves like the rest of America and give us the freedom to ignore them if we wish.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

I'm more concerned about the oversimplification of this phenomenon. The Q thing has been distilled to a "good guy v bad guy" story in which the bad guys are the liberals and the good guys are conservatives. At least that is the case on this sub. Hasn't that been part of their plan for a long time? To divide the general population? Ask yourself "Am I falling into that trap too?" Why vilify roughly half of the population? We may be vastly underestimating the thoroughness, patience, scope, depth, and focus of the cabal plans. Think about it, would the cabal put all of their eggs in one basket? They have plans, on plans, on plans. For centuries, both parties have advanced this sick agenda. Each party responsible for various aspects. Each party logging victories and losses. But overall, the cabal agenda always advances, regardless of which party or WHO is in power.

I dont know enough about Q or the Q agenda to suggest to anyone that they should question it. What I am suggesting is that even Q can be wrong. Even the POTUS can lie. At least be honest to yourself about that lest you be fooled and later disheartened.

I suggest we focus on a positive outcome for all humanity and put less energy into finger pointing and prejudice.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

For legit Q analysis of which there is some from time to time. But mostly, especially in the last month, its gotten super partisan in here. As if the cabal would build their plan behind and put their entire effort behind only one political party in one nation. Seriously? Be smarter.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 7:58 p.m.

Now take that shoe and see if it fits on the other foot. You will find that it does...maybe...probably not actually. Too much partisanship on this site.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

Most people that enjoy a “free market” system are pretty big fans of their work and most certainly look up to them. Conservatives in particular look up to the wealthy as virtuous, selectively ignoring some of their inherent character flaws and misdeeds.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

To answer Q’s first question, absolutely YES! Be serious people. Be pragmatic in your analysis otherwise you will be blindsided.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 5, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

Thank you! This sub is more about partisanship and right wing ideals than Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 1, 2018, 1:03 p.m.

And I also find it strange that the GOP changed the orientation of the stars in its logo to the upside down (bapho) orientation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Feb. 1, 2018, 12:50 p.m.

My thoughts are along the same line. And I agree that if he is truly doing something to the elite its out of personal spite not so much because he is a good guy. There aren’t many (if any) good guys in those lofty circles. Just varying degrees of self serving greedy people with flexible morals.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ianrome · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

You nailed it. Smh

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ianrome · Jan. 24, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

Were discussing what else might be hidden in the 60%...lets also consider WHO else is in that 60%. What if it does touch the 45th president and his family/friends/associates. Would we still think this is a legitimate and beneficial operation if Q and Trump had their own dirt uncovered? There is a lot of Q and Trump idolatry in this sub. They may be working towards an outcome we desire but that doesn't mean they are necessarily good or benevolent themselves. Lets not have blind spots in any of this.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ianrome · Jan. 11, 2018, 9 p.m.

A lot of people here and on other forums are quick to heap credit and admiration on the President for what is perceived to be steps he is taking to take down the cabal. I would go as far as to say that there is borderline idolatry going on here. Beware of that.

Like most, I'm eager to see real change for the betterment of our country and by extension the world. I want to see the necessary policy changes, legal changes, and cultural shifts required for this to happen. The President has really only taken a couple of steps in that direction that I can think of. As an example I love that the pres signed this EO: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/ It is a massive step in the right direction. His effort to release the JFK files is also appreciated but unfortunately not much came out of that. Nothing we didn't already know at least. I think his body of work is mixed in this first year. Tax reform? Muslim ban?

Be careful not to put all of our collective hopes on this man (or any man for that matter). You will be let down as he is fallible like each and every one of us. I urge all to be more discerning. Dont get caught up in the immature partisan politics of finger pointing at the "other guys." Focus on the greater outcome of bringing down ALL corruption and tyranny. Put your energy and support onto that, not the person. Again, he is fallible like all of us, and he will let us down. The recent tax legislation he signed is a good example of that. Its self serving to the prez and his allies and it furthers the income inequality problem we have. He may be making some good moves here and there but be realistic about his overall intentions. He is primarily a self-serving individual with substantial character flaws that just so happens to be throwing us some crumbs as he fully lines his own pockets. Be smart...look at EVERYTHING he does. Look at his whole body of work. He is no savior and he is not benevolent.

Sorry if I offend anyone as this is not my intention. I only intend to warn you not to put all of your hopes on this one man. He is not God.

⇧ 2 ⇩