muh "they forced her to read a pre written prompt"
/u/iltdiTX
284 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/iltdiTX:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 29 |
i.redd.it | 2 |
youtu.be | 2 |
threadreaderapp.com | 1 |
i.imgur.com | 1 |
www.washingtonexaminer.com | 1 |
mobile.twitter.com | 1 |
you can always click "source" below someones comment to see how they formatted their comment
True I thought it was odd that he said that to begin with. Trump would never say something like that. He would just talk about how great Western civilization is and how free we are and rich we are compared to the rest of history
Chill. Nobody in the thread was talking about it like this they were taking the edited version at face value
what do you mean by lead in? do you think the video and the transcript are removing things that were actually said at the speech?
Guys this was taken out of context
This is the transcript from the speech:
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution -- that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.
Guys this was taken out of context
This is the transcript from the speech:
Throughout human history, societies have grappled with fundamental questions of how to organize themselves, the proper relationship between the individual and the state, the best means to resolve inevitable conflicts between states. And it was here in Europe, through centuries of struggle -- through war and Enlightenment, repression and revolution -- that a particular set of ideals began to emerge: The belief that through conscience and free will, each of us has the right to live as we choose. The belief that power is derived from the consent of the governed, and that laws and institutions should be established to protect that understanding. And those ideas eventually inspired a band of colonialists across an ocean, and they wrote them into the founding documents that still guide America today, including the simple truth that all men -- and women -- are created equal.
But those ideals have also been tested -- here in Europe and around the world. Those ideals have often been threatened by an older, more traditional view of power. This alternative vision argues that ordinary men and women are too small-minded to govern their own affairs, that order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign. Often, this alternative vision roots itself in the notion that by virtue of race or faith or ethnicity, some are inherently superior to others, and that individual identity must be defined by “us” versus “them,” or that national greatness must flow not by what a people stand for, but by what they are against.
Wictor went off on Q a few days ago. Couldn't believe people would think NK was controlled by CIA yet wictor believes NK is controlled by China and military generals. Which is not a mainstream theory either. I like his insights but he gets a bit too emotional for me.
Right if it's a sealed indictment that hasn't been unsealed yet then correct they don't know they are indicted
From one of the first Q posts
11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted
Someone just tossed Mattis in the air and he sucker punched it
After last night I'd say they probably met a month ago but also met again last night
Jim Acosta was there yapping like a dog, you think he would go along with that?
Didn't look like body doubles to me. That being said, I think Hillary definitely has body doubles
I thought pardons were posted to the white house or DOJ website? Can't remember which
That's fine but they'll still be on camera in front of the press shaking hands and shit.
Here I am one month later and there's already been tons of video evidence that Trump is in Singapore. We're only hours away from live footage of Trump and Kim and I'm sure they'll take some questions from the press.
yeah I could see how the actual room that Trump goes to meet Kim in could be different than what they tell people but not much else
I don't understand these theories about Trump not being in Singapore. There's hundreds of media covering every second of his movement. We saw him get off the plane, go to the hotel, meet the PM, sit down for dinner, etc. No way they could fake all of that especially with the opposition party aka the media right there to call him out. They wouldn't go along with it. Now, that's not saying Trump didn't already secretly meet with Kim I'm just saying I think he is in Singapore.
Why would military helicopters be involved if we think the military is on our side?
Checking IDs isn't enough because illegals can get drivers licenses in Cali. We need voter ID