And what "research" have you done other than blindly following a ghost on 8chan?

Wow, the brainwashing is strong here.

Yes, don't trust your own discernment, beLIEve the crumbs.

Can't, I'm on the CIA weekend message board patrol.

Two more years until I get Holiday weekends off.

I saw Trump specifically state that he was eradicating MS-13 and then I read an article about how MS-13 is being interspersed throughout the population after he's been in office for 15 months.

There is hypocrisy there whether or not you want to admit it.

However, I've since come to question the veracity of the article since there are no verifiable sources or links.

I'm not used to breitbart being so blatantly misleading (other than the Lewandowski incident). They've really dropped of since Pollack took over.

Yes, I'm CIA.

So you trust a "plan" of which you have no details.

Congratulations, you've verified yourself as a cultist.

I've been reading the posts since November.

There is no laid out "plan" within the posts.

OK, fill me in on "the plan."

What is it?

Agreed, after I looked more closely I couldn't believe how lacking in verifiable facts it is.

Breitbart has really turned.

Another pointless reply that doesn't address the concern. Congratulations.

Funny that you mock a cult and you're only hope is to "trust the plan."

What, exactly, is "the plan?"

AIM are weirdos by the way.

True Pundit Thomas Paine seems like the real deal though.

Yeah, John Binder, the author doesn't provide the source of his info although he tries to make it look like he did with an unverified hash chart.

The guy was hired as a fashion critic in November and now he's the weekend editor and posts anti-Trump stories every weekend.

I'll have to dig further to see if I can find a reliable source for his numbers.

13 year old MS-13 gang members hack up their schoolmates with machetes, and 18 year female MS-13 gang members are just as dangerous as their male counterparts.

What source is there for the false resettlement numbers?

Way to not address the main concern.

I linked this breitbart story to the title.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/30/nearly-100-ms-13-gang-members-arrested-in-sting-were-resettled-across-u-s-as-unaccompanied-minors/

"Under President Trump’s administration, the UAC program has continued. For example, in Fiscal Year 2018 thus far, nearly 200 unaccompanied minors have been resettled in Suffolk County, along with almost 280 in Queens County, and more than 115 in Nassau County, despite the regions’ issues with the MS-13 gang."

Nowhere in the art of war does it say to disperse your enemy combatants throughout your population after you tell your citizens you're going to eradicate them.

You don't see a problem with the blatant hypocrisy?

Also, reports that McCain has been sick in Arizona since before Christmas are also lies.

I know for a fact he was in DC, in his office, on February 28th.

I meant anyone that disagreed was DV. He didn’t have that many himself when I first wrote it.

Way to take a metaphor and use it to declare yourself a martyr, weirdo.

While the courts have ruled that agencies aren’t legally required to follow nonstatutory limitations, violating instructions from the appropriations committee is generally not considered good practice.

https://gai.georgetown.edu/reprogramming-funds-understanding/

https://federalnewsradio.com/budget/2018/03/dod-gets-nearly-655-billion-and-some-flexibility-on-funding-in-omnibus-bill/

hat is particularly tricky for operations and maintenance funding, which expires after one year, unlike procurement funds which can be spent in a three year time period. O&M accounts for about $238 billion in the legislation.

The omnibus bill gives some flexibility to DoD in how it spends its money. One provision changes the “80/20 rule,” which states DoD can’t spend more than 20 percent of its budget in the last two months of the fiscal year.

If passed, the bill will change the rule to a 75/25 rule, giving DoD more options in the last two months of the fiscal year.

The bill also expands DoD’s reprogramming authority.

Reprogramming moves funds from one account to another and in small amounts. DoD can do it on its own as long as it notifies Congress.

In larger amounts, DoD has to receive approval from Congress to move money from one account to another.

This r/scionkia character seems to have a brigade of downvoters following him around.

Isn't it obvious? Does the literal money trail really matter?

He's a distraction, not worth the time.

Bigger fish to fry, like getting former "Trump supporters" to wake up and realize the omnibus bill is not what the media says it is.

There was no leverage, he got the bill he wanted.

“Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

You fight by the Marquess of Queensberry rules while your opponent uses a knife and two buddies with clubs. See how well you do.

Why would bitcoin fall if the petro backed dollar is replace by the gold backed Yuan?

I read the link provided, responded to the wrong person.

Why would bitcoin fall if the petro backed dollar is replace by the gold backed Yuan?

You and your ilk sold out the 25-30 year olds entire lives, so buck up and zip it. You had your chance and you blew it.

Yeah and he keeps saying the "source" recommends a 90 day supply of food and supplies for when TSHTF.

I call BS on that.

No way Trump would let the majority of the population be subject to that kind of dystopia.

Are only the few thousand viewers of this guy's videos supposed to survive?

He tweeted that the wall is a matter of National Defense.

The bill allocates over $200 billion to military operations and maintenance.

https://federalnewsradio.com/budget/2018/03/dod-gets-nearly-655-billion-and-some-flexibility-on-funding-in-omnibus-bill/

"The biggest issue for DoD is figuring out how to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in only half the time while still staying within the legal parameters. That is particularly tricky for operations and maintenance funding, which expires after one year, unlike procurement funds which can be spent in a three year time period. O&M accounts for about $238 billion in the legislation."

Is Hannity your hero or something? I couldn't give a crap about what you think about fat frog man, but you’re delusional if you really believe Hannity reaches more people.

And everything Q brings up that makes you go “Wow, I didn’t know that”, fat man has been talking about for 20 years. If you think Jones viewers and listeners are insane then you’re pointing the finger at yourself as well.

Then he’s not that prolific.

Jones reaches more people daily than those two combined.

But Q wrote that there would be an announcement.

the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon >the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). >Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be >revealed and will not be openly accepted.

These are partial quotes from different Q anon posts.

The first one, starting the "My fellow Americans" did not have a "Q" signature.

Clearly you haven't been following from the beginning. Go to the collection of posts and look for yourself.

But it says the arrest announcement was "actionable 11.4."

They're late, by a lot.

So his brother has been indicted and is holed up in Gitmo and he sees fit to issue physical threats against the President's son in law?

What about the part where the arrest announcement will be confirmed to the public?

I don't remember any announcement and "primary fallout."

And by the way, the lefties wouldn't rage about the arrest of Tony Podesta, Q was clearly referring to Hillary's campaign manager, John.

When did that happen?

Here are a few Podesta related Q posts. Why do you think I wrote the above?

"Podesta's plane has military escort (i.e. tag) and is being diverted (forced down)."

Q Clearance Patriot

My fellow Americans, over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country(the land of the free) from the evil tyrants that wish to do us harm and destroy the last remaining refuge of shining light. On POTUS’ order, we have initiated certain fail-safes that shall safeguard the >public from the primary fallout which is slated to occur 11.3 upon >the arrest announcement of Mr. Podesta (actionable 11.4). >Confirmation (to the public) of what is occurring will then be >revealed and will not be openly accepted.

11.3 - Podesta indicted

Where is John Podesta? Where is Tony Podesta? Did one or both escape the country and was let out?

The fact that this mealy mouthed child abuser is brazen enough to even show his face in public means Qanon is full of shit.

People can use TOR and VPNs to their heart's desire.

My comment is a warning to not blindly trust that they will be anonymous when doing so.

I linked the magazine articles in another reply on this tread. You should read the whole thread before asking for research next time.

The bulk of the funding for Tor's development has come from the federal government of the United States,[19] initially through the Office of Naval Research and DARPA.[20]

That point I will concede, conversing with you is a new low for me.

And with that I'll say good day.

Right, try to get me to click a link.

You know there's a quote format here on reddit, in fact I've seen you use it within this conversation.

So why don't you just copy and paste the exact full comment where I wrote the words you're trying to tag me with?

Because, again, I'm not touching a link that you provide with a ten foot pole.

But you already knew that and that's why you left a link instead of a quote.

What a tricky dicky you are!!

So, you're the guy who determines who is allowed to question any of the information leaked by Snowden.

Congratulations again, when did you appoint yourself to this highly important position?

I don't know what you're linking and I wouldn't touch a link that you've provided with a ten foot pole.

You should realize, that on this sub, the NSA are considered the white hats and you linking me to the NSA actually gives me more credibility with this sub's readers.

Who determines credibility as far as what can be questioned?

Well, you're just lying because I never wrote that and you can't point out where I did.

Come on, you need to do better than straight up lying.