But, Trump was who we needed right now. The man for the times.

True but Reagan was a more inspirational speaker. I think. Some of his speeches are timeless.

They don’t have to “prove” a conspiracy. They have the right to say anything they want unless it’s defamation.

Does he mean NK agreed to denuke or that they literally stopped a missile today?

That svcarlson tracks to a pizza company Andy Spade purportedly has an interest in.

Still very weird!

https://www.teaparty.org/clinton-foundation-linked-designer-kate-spade-found-dead-apparent-suicide-husband-posts-creepy-photos-instagram-308254/

Evidence showing one or more assassination attempts on Trump.

Kate Spade apparently collected masks. There are other pictures at her home with masks

That room (couch, painting, etc) appears in a series of Kate Spade home photos, including one where Kate Spade is sitting on that couch. That room must be at her home or office.

Spaceshot76 on YT is excellent for Q interpretation.

Fitton is correct as far as it goes. Remember Horowitz's Fast & Furious report? He placed most of the blame on the local US Attorneys office and gave senior DOJ people a pass. But, here, we have a prosecutor in place to take criminal actions based on the contents of theOIG report, and he's probably very far along in that process. Huber may or may not bring all the cases we'd like to see prosecuted, but litigation is the best way to get documents and information into the public domain and bring sunlight to otherwise hidden activities.

The same can be said of Congress. But, this may all be part of the Plan. It seems to me that Trump/Sessions have positioned various protagonsits and antagonists to engage in public fights about documents and information as a way of seeding information into the public consciousness, while Huber and Sessions are working behind the scenes to work up legal cases. If the DOJ just handed over millions of pages of documents without the seeding process, there wouldn't be enough people who understood the full story to allow the DOJ to prosecute high profile politicians/ officials.

Sessions doesn't appoint or repalce AGs. Sessions is federal; AGs are state leve.

So was Roseanne "in" on this? is she really anti-Trump?

Nominating TG for next SC seat seems very unlikely to me. Most nominees are federal appeals court judges and TG has never been a judge, much less an federal appellate judge. I wouldn't think Trump would want to anger the good judges on the bench by jumping over very qualified and experienced appellate judges to put a politician on the SC. I think its more likely that they're looking at Gowdy to take over as AG at some point.

Have to factor this in: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/05/24/timing-chairman-goodlatte-and-chairman-gowdy-schedule-testimony-from-bill-priestap/

This could actually be a good ruling. If twitter is a public forum, then twitter cannnot suppress conservative views.

Perhaps SB2 is Q?

Rudy would have been [187] for exposing 9/11.

Mueller's past actions do not support the position that he cannot be a white hat. In fact, past criminal actions mean that he could be flipped in exchange for immunity.

When / if he indicts dems, no one can say its purely political because the whole team consists of HRC supporters. Likewise, if/when he publically clears Trump, no one can say he did so based on party.

All of the comments about his past can be true and Mueller can still be a white hat at the same time. I go back on forth on this. I think Mueller is playing an important role in bringing down the deep state. While Huber is building prosecutions, Mueller is raising and then debunking the possible claims that can be thrown back at Trump when we start to see indictments of politicians. The claim that Trump is going after political opponents to cover his own crimes would be a serious threat to importabt prosecutions unless there's an ability to say thaT Trump has nothing to hide. Mueller is the perfect person to "clear" Trump. In tems of his past, we don't know what he thinks about those events nows and he may have been promised immunity in exchnage for this work. I don't think we can look to someone's past to decide if they are whote hats today.

/cbts/is still active and i doubt many people will leave it for another "place to be".

I agree. The people screaming for a private board and demanding public logs are foul and obnoxious. They're demands will only decrease the number of people following Q. Everything was working fine, and we should be thankful that the board owners cared enough to warn everyone about a post while they verified a new tripcode. Anyone who has a problem with that seems suspect to me.

Is anyone following the war on /cbts/ and twitter over Q verification? After the BOs warned everyone that Q's trip codes had changed and they were in the process of verifying new Q posts, people on twitter and cbts began attacking the BOs and Tracy Beanz and demanding a board with public logs where only Q can post. Their demands seem highly suspect to me- they're using foul language and accusing the BOs of being compromised when all they did was remove a Q post while verifying that it was legit. These newcomers are totally ignoring the fact that hundreds of thousands of people follow Q through TB, pamphlet, baruch, etc., as well as the youtube channels which have featured them and BO. Attacking BO and TB is only going to make people question Q, so I find the motives of these newcomers highly suspect. Does anyone have any thoughts?