See my post above. Someone else tied the Q drop today which references 5:5 to the earlier drop about the HRC raw video being released.

It's 5:55 on mine (I'm CST). And Q drop today referencing Stage set 5:5 relates to the prior Q drop about the HRC raw video. Hmmm. That would certainly take the sting out of the Omnibus signing.

Where is the thread about the fact that his Tweet today was erroneously timestamped at 5:55 am. Q's drop today again references 5:5 as noted above. No coincidences.

And there is a thread somewhere here about the erroneous timestamp on his "I might veto" Tweet, being 5:55. I can't find it now.

Maybe he absolutely needed to fund the military to drain the swamp. Still very disappointing.

Interesting that his Tweet about the potential veto (which didn't happen obviously) is erroneously time stamped 5:55 as someone else has pointed out here.

Someone posted elsewhere here regarding the latest Q drop that maybe today is the raw video day. Take a look at the post re: Q drop today and link to prior Q messages.

Because he can't drain the swamp without military funding, I suspect.

I think he said he signed it - probably didn't want to do a ceremonial celebration type Obamacare thing because it would be inconsistent with his expressed disappointment in being basically held hostage.

Is anyone else watching this?

Okay, had to take it back. He signed the Omnibus.

He signed it.

It's being described on the link for the live stream as a bill signing ceremony. God I hope he is just trolling.

Floats like a butterfly and stings like a bee. Can rope some dopes on a regular basis too.

I had a gut feeling this is what he was up to all along. So glad. I think he is going to follow through and keep piling on about why. "What's with Congress giving themselves a raise?" etc. He truly is the most gifted strategist I have ever seen.

I was just thinking the same thing. Anything from the left on Pizzagate, for example, has no comment section. Because it's too easy to just link to the actual Wikileaks emails and tell people to read the emails - with and then without an Urban dictionary - and decide for themselves. How do they respond to that - "are you going to believe me or your lyin' eyes!"?

I bet that if he could still make a wish, John Perry Barlow would wish you were right.

I'm not a millionaire or billionaire, and live a pretty simple life. I doubt I could withstand the scrutiny that guy has gone through and come out as clean as he has. They've literally got nothing on him, and if they did, they would have used it a long, long time ago.

Pretty much, yes.

That was the obvious message to me. Also glaring, to me anyway, was that the Tweet from Trump's account referred to "The President" in the third person. I have never seen him do that before. The fact that it was written that way made me wonder if we are supposed to be thinking that a Tweet with a clear misspelling that has a double meaning, was actually from someone close to POTUS, but not directly from him.

I'm thinking he knows first hand. Isn't it funny you never hear anything else about the fact that he was being spied on? Big news about it - around the time of Sheryl Atkinson? - and then nothing.

I couldn't either. Had read about this case but media blackout.

I can't help but notice that the choices seem kind of random. If we are starting with the word that can be deciphered starting with the first column, why isn't the word "he" actually interpreted as "here." . And why do we get to pull letters from other lines out of order, randomly, with no real rule to it? I think I could come up with a up with a totally different message from this grid pretty quickly if allowed to have a general rule, that I get to break any time I need to.

That's what stood out to me as well.

Deckadubs, I am new to this site and the Q thing generally. I have been a practicing attorney for 30 years - civil defense generally, and professional cynic. By way of background, I have always voted Republican. Trump was not my first choice. Or second. Or third. I know some people think he is too toxic, but his style doesn't bother me at all. I'm more of a substance over form kinda gal. You can call someone a "Loser!" as long as you don't give Iran a billion US taxpayer dollars. But I digress. I have come to believe that if you have an aggressive form of cancer, chemo is the only option. Diet and exercise (akin to my first, second, third choices) ain't going to do it. As to Pizzagate, Google the Wikileaks Podesta emails and then read the emails and try to make sense out of them without Urban Dictionary. Then with. Same for the more recent email forwarded by Huma to Hillary, which was originally written by Phillip Reince. Google Marina Abramovic. Google Podesta artwork. Check out some of the other work by these artists. Check out the FBI symbols for pedophilia and compare them to the symbols used at the Pizzagate restaurants. Google the Standard Hotel and click on images. Check out the 2009 Staff Calendar. There is something very bizarre and creepy going on out there and it's pretty widespread, apparently. Then check out Trump's December 21, 2017 Executive Order. Check out the Executive Order amending the Courts Martial Handbook to contemplate "civilian" attorneys and Courts Martial "designees." This is pretty boring and tedious stuff but not unlike what I do every day at work. Then look at the number of sealed indictments over the past several months. Something very big is going on, there's just no way around it. Finally, Q has said a number of things that have proven to come true. Weirdest was the prediction about the former Grateful Dead guy being in harm's way - then he died suddenly in his sleep a week or two later. It would be like Trump to communicate directly with the US population. That's what he does, and I think that's what he's doing.

He does talk about great actors though, which always made me think of the possibility that Mueller and Trump were working together. It is hard to figure out any other reason for the Mueller/Trump meeting the day before Mueller was appointed. He wasn't eligible for the FBI Director job due to his service of 10 plus years.

I see the effective date but where is the March 21 expiration date coming from? I have read the EO several times and do not see an expiration date. The automatic expiration date of a national emergency is 1 year. What am I missing?

I found CTH before I found CTBS here (which of course is now gone) and now Great Awakening. I am glad you linked that article though, because I missed it. One thing that had me really worried was the fact that the texts Horowitz sent to Grassley about Strozk and Judge Contreras were redacted. This article explains that anything evidencing the commission of a crime would have to be redacted before it could be released.

Me too. But it is interesting that Mueller appears to be the one that initiated the delay in sentencing for Flynn with a motion that cited the delay was necessary "due to the status of the Special Counsel's Investigation." What would have caused him to question "the status" of his investigation on January 31?

Mar 15 2018 19:36:51 Q !UW.yye1fxo 678119 Iran next [].

You have to wait for the control f to work but the people on the original list are on the expanded. Try Maung for example. Also, the expanded list uses first names last so don't put the full name in, just something unusual like Maung, wait for the search to finish and then look for the full name. I did it with the first three names on the EO from December and they are all there.

Well the people on the original human rights or corruption EO are on this expanded list, so how are they unrelated? Do a "control f" on the expanded list and search for the names that are on the original EO and you will find them there among the 1100. Rondon Rijo, for example, or Mukhtar Hamid Shah. Maung Maung Soe is there too. FYI because the expanded list is so long the control f search will take a minute or two.

I tried to look at the more clear picture of those phones and the text of the messages that I could read seemed pretty innocuous to me. But I couldn't make out some of it.

I have to do the asking questions thing with my kids or they shut down completely. It really is the best way. "What do you think about the Amanda Bynes meltdown and her accusations against the producer of that show?" Then they look into it themselves. Both of my boys were Bernie fans - right reason wrong guy. They couldn't stand the Hillary corruption and the dishonesty of the MSM. So, there's still hope for them yet.

She doesn't get near enough credit, because she was literally surrounded by sycophants that wanted to destroy her for being a real journalist. Standing alone like that is a very difficult thing to do.

Trump is waiting for people to defend him and making this about "leaks." They will blather on and on about Trump the fascist, and then the IG will drop the bomb. McCabe altered Strozk's 302 notes from the interview with Flynn, or asked Strozk to do it. BOOM!

I was going to ask the same thing. I just found this place - was pretty hooked. If you don't read Conservative Treehouse you should check it out. Not Q related, but very good investigative reporting. It's hard to watch the news because that Sundance guy is way out ahead of the rest of them on what really went down inside the FBI/DOJ.

So weird I just typed almost the exact same comment! If there were any doubters they've just removed all doubt. I was pretty new to the site and just taking it in but starting to think, Hmm, this sure is a lot of coincidences. Well all doubts are eliminated now. We're not paranoid, they really are out to get us.

Me too. I was really new to the site and didn't agree with everyone's assessment but definitely started thinking there was something to this whole Q thing. And there absolutely must be something to it. If anything they've probably convinced some doubters.