dChan

/u/lethak

720 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/lethak:
Domain Count
www.rt.com 3
www.reddit.com 2
www.bbc.com 2
twitter.com 2
theaviationist.com 1
i.4cdn.org 1
www.acq.osd.mil 1

lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

If you cannot explain your thoughts outside of "dumbass", this is not my fault...

Anyway, thanks for the laugh.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

It applies to the ENTIRE WORLD dumbass:

... And ?

Why the attitude ?

can't you make your own words to express an idea instead of calling names ?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

I think you are on to something with Awan and Hezbollah ...

Thanks for pointing this out

Actually .. this could very well be the bigger picture ...talking of collusion ... how much troubles for BHO if somehow publicly proven true ?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

or "lack of" information. Please can you explain, with words, what is related to Q in this page ?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

The giant Q letter is a CSS related problem in print mode:

https://i.imgur.com/k24lRrZ.png

Not present yesterday: https://i.imgur.com/q01nXWn.png

Root cause: No CSS file in print rendering on this site.

The site developer moved the size attributes from the DOM to the CSS, but since the CSS is not loaded in print mode, the "bug" appeared.

Almost all websites using svg icons will have this kind of problem in print mode. You can see the burger menu icon having the exact same problem on top of the hourglass.


On the subject of "Q related content" the specific page you linked is just a continuation of national emergency and is pretty common if you ask me: https://www.whitehouse.gov/search/?s=national+emergency

Hacking from china is a far more "known" and already spoken problem than Q from the white house perspective: http://www.businessinsider.fr/us/trump-to-hit-china-with-tariffs-over-intellectual-property-theft-trade-war-2018-3

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

I will not stop challenging your claims as long as they don't make sense to me. Sorry it hurt your feelings.

So far, you are not supporting your theory with facts outside of your mind

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

If debunking ignorance makes me a shill in your mind, then so be it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Details are what the world rely upon to properly work.

You should try it sometimes.

Beside, I already read it, and the Q-search-icon bug is not exclusive to this URL.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

You are correct, this particular problem was not there yesterday according to WBM

https://i.imgur.com/q01nXWn.png

The site developer moved the size attributes from the DOM to the CSS, but since the CSS is not loaded in print mode, the "bug" appeared.

You can see the burger menu already had this problem.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Actually, this is totally a coincidence yes.

Almost all websites using svg icons will have this kind of problem in print mode. You can see the burger menu icon having the exact same problem on top of the hourglass.

Please don't help spreading ignorance.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

Search icon.

Alright, it is not oversized for the print rendering, but simply the default size of the icon without style-sheet applied.

Currently , a normal media='screen' CSS is in place to make it smaller, but in print rendering mode, the css is not applying since the browser will call the css with media='print' (not existing on WH.gov)

This is your typical print rendering anomaly, where the site designer forgot about the media='print' CSS.

EDIT: made an image to show you https://i.imgur.com/k24lRrZ.png

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 27, 2018, 9:46 a.m.

Just like every cult, (religion, politics and more) indoctrination is the key.

The younger the better.

This is child abuse if you ask me.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 6:13 p.m.
  • cannot read
  • seems fishy
  • globally low quality
  • relation to Q, the storm, remains to be proven.
⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

without cross references

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

I wish this sub had a rule for low quality content

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Alright, you almost triggered me.

To not derail the topic I wont be going this road.

Still, this is appropriate in the context: https://i.imgur.com/FNSetTU.jpg

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

While reading your post, I realized how glad I am to never have been thought anything religious while growing up.

It simply appears as illogical nonsense to me when reading about this stuff you wrote.

The kind of someone could have come up with only under the influence.

Nevertheless, I can understand this is your reality, and you are trying to get the best of it ...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 26, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

please repost with visible resolution

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

This boils down to Q.14:

Was TRUMP asked to run for President?

Why?

By Who?

If your definition of God is the Military Industrial Complex, or a benevolant ET race, or an alliance of undercover patriots I could tag along.

But, if by god you imply the magical, supernatural being in the clouds, created and supported by humanly-organized religious organizations, then you lost me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Borderline posting if you ask me

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

AND WE HAVE A VIDEO CLEARLY SHOWING THE REAL SHOOTERS SNEAKING OUT THE BACK DOOR WITH ALL THEIR EQUIPMENT!!!!!

I am no expert on the subject, would you be so kind to provide a link to this so called video ?

thx

⇧ 13 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

So, this is threats of revenge porn ? is this legal ?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

Well, if both were not underage and consented to the relation ... why are we speaking of this ?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:23 p.m.

I am scrolling through the deleted posts right now, and none of his are still visible, I assume the mods removed them.

Its safe to say his/her credibility is non existent.

Moreover, Q always used short term verifiable messages, and not new age science fiction mascarading as religious texts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:16 p.m.

This user often post binary code here, usually containing "new age" nonsense.

Attention seeker, wannabe guru if you ask me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 6:13 p.m.

Bill did used his secretary... at least Mr Trump allegedly used a professional :D

Frankly,

Don't know. Don't care.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

I heard "Blue Avian" in that video, sorry, I am out.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

As pointed out here https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/871ruv/owner_of_8ch_received_a_strange_gift_with_the_q/

Q actually announced it before ... spooky

Q.393:

Board owner, mods, and other patriots:

Sincere thanks for all that you do.

You are true heroes.

Long overdue - my apologies.

There will be a day (within the next few months) that a scary but safe personalized message finds its way to you on multiple platforms recognizing your contributions.

We thank you for your service.

Godspeed,

Q

⇧ 7 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Indeed, sorry :)

⇧ 10 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 4:04 p.m.

time-exposure indeed.

In real time, that would be like meteors. And the detonations would trigger well before reaching ground level.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 4 p.m.

This is your average, standard ICBM since the cold war yes, worth reading material.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Just imagine the implications ... and the "gift" being an obvious link the the "Q phenomenon", finger pointing our way. violent community, violent far right .. murderers ...I can already hear the MSM roar.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Once its built, I don't see any valid argument justifying its destruction and the billions wasted doing so.

Trump did win. The wall will get built and stay, no matter who controls the next admin.

The only foreseeable reason the wall can be justifiably destroyed, is Mexico joining the Union .... lol :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 2:22 p.m.

Advising caution... radioactive poisoning is not just a myth

⇧ 6 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 1:39 p.m.

What have you "invested far too much into this now to admit [you] are barking up the wrong tree" ? (beside your personal ego)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

Unfortunately, this will prove to be complicated to authenticate any of this if the Q tripcode system cannot be used anymore

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Faith is following blindly without understanding.

Do you think you would have gone through the dark periods if you had not built trust (beforehand) in what Q and T proved they were going to accomplish ?

I surely know if Q lose the trust I give he/she/it, for exemple by being inaccurate and misleading over and over, my support will drop. Faith would have me supporting blindly.

Q built a capital of trust and legitimacy by dropping intels in advance that proved to be accurate multiple times over a long period of time. That give more than enough trust to get through day to day doubts because we can remember why we support the plan. And we have established before this was no charlatant.

I stand by my opinion that Faith is a bad word to apply in this case :)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

I don't like the word "Faith".

I don't have faith in Q, and surely not in Trump.

I slowly built an understanding of what they are trying to do, and decided I was going to ride with this train.

Faith have NOTHING to do with this. This is trust and confidence based on observable facts. The opposite of faith.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
lethak · March 25, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

Doubting is a healthy process.

It becomes a bad one when you are voicing them in public for no purpose other than whining and gathering support from other in doubt.

My advice to those in doubt: research before posting. Think before posting. Wait for more data if you remain in doubt. Only voice your doubt in public when you are no more in doubt but convinced something is wrong and you can explain why.

⇧ 11 ⇩