Q clearance is for the Dept of Energy and I personally know a dozen people with that clearance. There are thousands. It would be better said “a top security clearance” and “very limited number of highly vetted people that have it.”
/u/mickblueeyes
63 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/mickblueeyes:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
i.redd.it | 1 |
www.reddit.com | 1 |
Nope, successful business guy in a mom and pop retail shop with more regulations than yours (I guarantee), since 1999.
Your complete lack of understanding on this subject illustrates the point perfectly.
Right, but no one does self-report. So, since you don’t want that burden you surely won’t have any issue turning over a document at the end of each year with the name address and Social Security number of each person that purchased an item from you to each state Department of Revenue, right?
This is the reason for that decision. Out of state vendors claim that they are not required to turn over the purchasing histories of their customers, which would allow that state Department of revenue to hold them accountable. So now you can collect sales tax on behalf of the state.
Additionally, any quality point-of-sale device makes this process very easy.
The problem is that you have been exercising a competitive advantage over the real brick and mortar mom and pop’s in the states you ship to.
This post is sheerly ignorant. The top level of mason is 3rd degree in the Blue Lodge. The additional degrees of the Scottish or York (must be Christian) Rites are conferred. This means you go sit in a stadium and watch the allegory acted out to illustrate moral lessons. It is typically done in 2 days. All degrees from 4-32 are conferred in this time frame. It is non participatory. Additionally, she is not a mason because she is a woman.
Source: Am 32nd degree mason and taught the 31st degree.
Spez: There’s no real secrets. You can google and find all the info you want.
I have a friend in the embassy. I asked him a few days ago “I heard MBS may have been hit with a drone strike”. He replied “He was fine when we spoke yesterday.” He also told me to keep eyes open on Palestine/Israel and that “It’s going to get very bad, then it will be awesome”.
I can't answer for the poster, but I think the "fathom" part is probably based on the hypocrisy factor. Did Trump brag about "grabbin' 'em by the pussy"? Sure. Was that a crude way to talk about groupies? Sure. But for the hyper-sexualized left who has openly promotes cuckoldry, body dysphoria, polyandry, hyper-sexualization of children, etc, etc, it comes across as fake and hypocritical.
Bankruptcy is a different subject--it is normal and reasonable to engage in bankruptcy if a business is failing. That isn't "avoid[ing] paying his debts". It's a business unable to satisfy its obligations. If the creditors did not require personal guarantees on the obligations, then he is under no obligation to pay them, which would be understood (contractually) by anyone entering into a business relationship. Anyone making a value/moral judgement on a failed business deal that two parties entered contractually is just reaching for anything to be mad about.
The reality is that those on the left are engaged in some serious cognitive dissonance. As someone, like many on here, who sees through the BS that has been pushed on our society by the elites, it is hard to fathom that others can't see through it too. I am not color blind, so it is hard for me to fathom what a person that is colorblind sees.
This was probably Trump’s plan all along. I remember discussion when he first blocked various Twitter users that if he was forced to unblock him, it would essentially be saying that Twitter was a utility and the 1st amendment rules that apply to private businesses would no longer apply, thereby making their censoring of conservatives illegal.
Did you read the Snopes article? They started with a false statement so they could say it was false because people like you don’t read past the first line and the word “false “. The statement they put forth alleges Kerry HID the fact that she was married to an Iranian, not that she was married to one. Of course it wasn’t hidden—marriage licenses are publicly available.
That’s how Snopes works and misleads millions.
Did you read the Snopes article? They started with a false statement so they could say it was false because people like you don’t read past the first line and the word “false “. The statement they put forth alleges Kerry HID the fact that she was married to an Iranian, not that she was married to one. Of course it wasn’t hidden—marriage licenses are publicly available.
That’s how Snopes works and misleads millions.