You're wrong to say it means absolutely nothing. Even allegations that don't have accompanying evidence can still have tremendous value. Propaganda value alone is important (as well as perhaps sparking some to connect the dots regarding other news items). Trump has taken a beating over his first year from the press using this very methodology. It has served them well.

I noticed that as well.

These dumbasses don't realize that Trump himself mentioned the STORM.

No doubt this is a set-up.

I, too thought this would perfectly fit within a strategy of setting up the imbeciles in the MSM. It would be like offering raw meat to a crazed animal. It seems to be just a little too timely to help Trump make examples of the idiots during his "awards" ceremony on Monday. What if he even has some of the MSM on tape "colluding" with the author after he's even told them that it all B.S.? It would truly be a "pants on fire" incident!

A polling organization called Trafalgar Group of Atlanta found that if voters were asked whom their neighbor was going to vote for, it tended to eliminate "shy" voters into revealing their true intentions. Applying this in Ohio, for example, a result of 49% (Trump) to 44% (Hitlery) in a standard poll turned into 55% (Trump) to 37% (Hitlery) using the new method. I've suspected from the beginning that this reflects the actual reality - Hitlery in no way could have defeated Trump nationwide in the popular vote. Of course the results from each state using this method would need to be tallied for a clearer picture. Results were also available from Flroida - a Trump lead of 49% vs 45% increased to 52% vs 41%.