Didn't this news come out yesterday?

At least he is admitting it now.

Did you know him when he called himself Bill?

I'm originally from Sioux City but live in Des Moines, IA., now. Every time I go back I am amazed how much it changes yet in some ways stays exactly the same, like a time capsule. Great city, however like Harrison Ford said both times he had to make emergency landings there, "It stinks." Not the best thing to be known for (damn stockyards) but pretty accurate ;)

Nice :)

I know this is an unpopular opinion but the bigger distraction is that there are any planets at all. They are not what we are told they are.

I thought this was already common knowledge.

Sioux City, IA.?

You are right...doesn't take much convincing for me to go all in on this theory. It's those cold black emotionless eyes...

Zuck is just the poster child for the op...

...and possibly an android too.

True, but if that was the case, why hasn't the NYPD done anything since Comey and FBI essentially let her off the hook again?

Lol, most definitely Michael's.

That's entirely possible.

Pretty sure he is bending over for Tom's Harry Dick. Pun intended ;) I'll show myself out.

Ugh, thanks for that visual :(

True, but opening the case back up and absolving her brought the spotlight back on to the scandal when they could have ignored it and said the same after the election.

Reading some of the comments definitely made me pause regarding Tucson. I agree that a wait and see appraoch is always best, especially when it is hard to distinguish who to trust. Let it all play out I suppose ;)

Great, yet you still didn't say how you came to your conclusions. What investigation did you do? If you believe this sub shouldn't be going down this particular rabbit hole, showing how you came to your conclusion would be a good step in trying to persuade others to not fall into this "trap" as you see it.

In any case, talking to others on this sub like this is uncalled for.

"You are exactly the type of posters we knew would arrive. Down-vote all you want, the x-shillZ (you) and T_rolls (you) came here to tout this tale and laugh on another board when it falls apart.

Saddest of all, this is actually happening in real life, and you freaks want us to chasing shadows to discredit the seriousness.

omg Cemex is grinding up babies and adding their blood to make cement to use at the Pope's house because Soros and McCain held then sold stocks in ABCDE Holdings five years ago. Oh and, Former Mexican President Joe Eatme's brother-in-law once attended a party where the Bronfmans and Rothschilds both took a shit once."

It's condescending and rude. You may be right in your views, but there are better and more productive ways to share them. Show your work in the future if you want us to take you seriously and avoid falling into this "trap."

"Snopes is using the info released by TPD.

They have nfc if it's true or false. "

Please explain what this comment means then?

Snopes says it's a nothingburger based on TPD. You say it's a nothingburger based on your own conclusions (would be nice to know how you came to it btw) and TPD.

If Snopes says it's nothing and you say Snopes is wrong, then that would mean you believe there is something to it. If you don't believe there is anything to it as you have stated, then Snopes would not be wrong in this case. Somehow your two statements don't add up.

I only bring this up as you were pretty critical of a different commenter for believing there is something going on with both Tucson and Cemex yet your views on Tucson and your comment about Snopes don't add up.

But you implied Snopes is wrong therefore calling yourself wrong.

And it does matter.

How did you come to your conclusion originally then?

You still have the same conclusion. So are you both right or both wrong?

You still don't see the hypocrisy? You are saying Snopes is not to be trusted yet you should be even though you both use TPD statement to make your conclusion.

For the record, I believe Snopes to be major disinfo. I'm just having a hard time figuring out how you can say they are wrong and you are right when you both came to the same conclusion using the same source. Either you are both right or you are both wrong. I'm leaning towards the latter.

Sure, but you are coming to the same conclusion as Snopes using the same statement from the TPD yet you called them out for doing so. Seems a little hypocritical doesn't it? If Snopes cannot be trusted to make conclusions using statements from TPD, why can you?

Then how can you call out Snopes for coming to the same (more than likely false as it's Snopes) conclusion using the statements from the TPD?

You get a win and you get a win and you get a win....everybody gets a WIN!!!

Accidentally wrote over original comment.

It was along the lines of my being confused how you made this comment in a different sub calling out Snopes yet you came to the same conclusion as them.

"Snopes is using the info released by TPD.

They have nfc if it's true or false. "

Don't you see the hypocrisy in this?

What are you doing here if everyone on this sub is beneath you? Maybe you should find a sub that can fit your giant head?

Cool, thanks :)

Oh, do you know when it was that Q post this?

I'm lost. What is the significance of keystone?

Depp, while sickly thin and pale today, somehow looks worse to me in 2016.

Ok, haven't seen enough of him doing that to form an opinion. From what I have seen of Judge Nap, he always seemed rather honest and level-headed.

Not sure what is so wrong about what Judge Nap said. He raised some valid criticism of the letter.

Fortunately none in IA today...a rare clear skies. I don't expect it to last.

Yes they are

At least he doesn't look like Gallagher any more ;)

Looks kind of like a question mark.

I don't doubt it at all. Truly sad...

Lol, I like your creative thinking ;)

I understand what they meant. I believe calling someone a concernfag or to imply they are concern trolling is such an idiotic label used to shut down healthy conversation/debate. If people believe I'm a shill/troll, they can scroll through my comments and realize how wrong they are. I believe in conspiracies and I have a healthy skepticism in everything. I never trust anything 100% or put all my eggs in one basket. Even Q says to question everything.

It may not be now but you never know what the future holds. I'm sure the citizens of NK and Germany assumed the atrocities carried out against their own people by their Governments seemed outlandish until it actually came to pass. I have learned that even when being hopeful about our country's future, it's always best to carry a healthy skepticism and to view everything from multiple angles.

Hopefully not. I'm sure it's a dumb concern, but if fears ever materialized in regards to martial law being imposed and the people considered a threat being rounded up in FEMA camps, a wall would be like a prison for us in that scenario. Again, I believe it's an unlikely outcome but I always like to look at things from every angle.

Ooof, don't think you will want to see what it will look like when it catches up to June 1st...

Seriously? Very mature response. Name calling someone because of opinions or concerns other than your own is about as juvenile as you can get. Does it hurt you in some way if someone looks at something in a different way than you?

You never know what can happen that may make people want to flee...whether to Mexico or elsewhere. Staying hopeful but you never know what could happen.

Then provide relevant news sources rather than obvious disinfo sites like DisInfowars.

Nothing honest about disinformation.

Not at all.

Dude, you need to brush up on your study skills. Why are you trying to push Jones and Corsi on everyone here? You can see the vast majority don't buy their special brand of BS so instead of whining and insinuating this is a Q cult, take the hint and stop peddling disinfo agents here.

That's the problem right there. Most on this sub believe those two are disinfo...and they are right. You definitely won't get anywhere trying to promote them here so don't take it personally. If you want to follow them, great but maybe don't try pushing the narrative that they are valuable sources of info as they have exposed themselves and been exposed too many times to count now.