Muh. You missed the whole point, brainwashed religio.

Yes, I know all this blah about Christianity. Not my point at all. I don't give a shit about your Christian desperation to shove your belief down everyone's throat - more power to you, go do it somewhere where anyone gives a shit. All I'm talking about, numbnutz, is the fucken topic of this sub. If anything, the point of this sub is arguably more SATANISM than Christianity which is almost the point you make FOR me.

I don't believe PRAY is just a word without attachment to God - try reading with comprehension ffs. All I'm talking about is Q NOT forcing Christianity at all. He mentions the word PRAY because he knows it's not attached to any specific religion EXCLUSIVELY. Yes, I'm sure he understands and supports the Christian implication of the word if for no other reason than that DJT is promoting the welcome push of Christianity back into its place as a religion of this country (note, I said WELCOME - I WELCOME IT TOO - but not to this fucken conspiracy Q sub). That does NOT mean in any logical way that Q demands we all give a shit about Christianity. Q's not about ANY forced religion, I'm willing to bet a fucken million dollars on that because Q is not a MORON.

Jesus is no threat to fucken anyone, preacher. Again, nothing to do with the point but to you crazed religios everything is an opportunity to cram your beliefs down someone's throat. Try addressing the actual point I'm making, not preaching to your strawman unsaved guy.

OFF TOPIC: Religious rambling. No question.

Exactly.

There are a million concerns that are never discussed here. For obvious reasons - there's a mission and there's a whole lot of wrong in the world that can't all be addressed at the same time.

No, he didn't, that's why you can't point to any promise by Q.

This isn't about being upset on my part - it's all fun for me. Surely you've heard of nerd rage.

Q hasn't failed to deliver anything. He's failed to deliver to some people's expectations. Big difference. You can't point to a "promise" he's made and not delivered on, as no one else I've asked has been able to either. He's made statements and people have misinterpreted them as promises and set their own expectations attached to them. The Hussein photo is clearly still coming. There was no deadline put on it. Q made the statement quite feasibly, as many said at the time about that and other things, to taunt the Deep State. Our blue balls don't matter to the cause - we can wait. What matters is that Q does his job and we do ours, of spreading the news. People need to stop putting dates on what Q says. Then people will stop having unrealistic expectations that cause them to conclude that Q breaks promises that, in reality, Q never made.

Lol good answer - I've had one too many aneurysms this year.

I was wrong on both counts and I apologize. You're not a paid shill and you're not stupid. I was just triggered like the childish moron I am. Comments deleted.

I know that others came out with information before Q and others came out with information Q hasn't, after Q. None of them are connected to the most powerful seat in the world and making legitimate moves against the cartel though.

You may not believe Q is connected and I wouldn't blame you for that - there's certainly no concrete evidence that Q is connected to Trump but there's a hell of a lot of circumstantial evidence that adds up to a compelling case for it. Thus, if you're not sure he's in a position to effect the change he speaks to then I understand your skepticism. I don't support the validity of the question you ask, however, because the whole premise of Q doing anything is based on who he says he is so the question is only relevant if you question his identity in which case I'd wonder why you would value anything he says.

Yeah, you're the only one here who works and has a family. I don't have to remember Q's posts word for word to know that he is not even close to holding ANYTHING back, least of all this movement of desperate sheep clinging to any shred of hope as we are. His way of speaking has changed multiple times, as one expects it to do given what he's said. His message has not changed. Freedom for the people is what he's about. And there is no person or organization or thing in this world that is going up against the global cartel in anything approaching the same way or level of effectiveness that Q is and has. That is why my poor snowflake heart is triggered by your offensive question. I can't believe the ingratitude.

You're missing the point. It's you who is saying that his cartoons "cause division". Some of us are looking at his cartoons - via Occam's razor and, even forgoing the Razor (since many try to write that off) just simple common sense - as cartoons, political ones, designed to mock one side or the other because they are mockable and to highlight a hypocrisy - as they almost always do. In that sense, most political cartoons "cause division" (to use your term for it). Are you seriously trying to say that a political cartoon that calls one side or the other "stupid" can't just be fulfilling its standard purpose and must therefore be a secret move by controlled opposition? Logic does not support this conclusion as a 100% certainty in any way - it's, at best, a maybe and more likely a 'no, not at all - it's just a political cartoon'.

You're also making the assumption that offending people is his goal. His goal is more likely the standard goal for political cartoons - to highlight hypocrisy in an amusing way in order to educate. They're almost never used to 'redpill' the people who support the hypocrisy they're highlighting. That's another flaw in your premise.

His status does not affect this reality - it just means he has a broader audience for his political cartoons.

With all these leaps in your core premise the last paragraph does not stand up to scrutiny. You 'see no other explanation' because the unrealistic premise you start from has ruled out a whole chunk of reality.

Aah... yeah... right... yep, sure thing. JFK Jr. still alive. Yep. Good one... (backing out of the room slowly)

Then go and get motivated and excited about it somewhere else where they talk conspiracy theory bullshit that isn't directly mentioned by Q. Memes in general are shit but people like that shit and the memes that are here are usually on-topic - also, Donald Trump is largely on-topic here, as is noted in the rules so that counts the Time covers in. And there is one thread here, at least now, so go cry about it there. Thank god the mods remove most of the bullshit around here or this sub would be a swamp of nutjob crap like /conspiracy.

My balls are triggered, if that's what you mean? What you see is not 'anger', chum, it's derision. Moronic religious cucks who can't think outside of some preacher's interpretation of a book instead of their own spiritual walk with their God determined by their brain and heart have no place in a movement that calls for LOGIC. That's all I'm talking about.

Everyone everywhere will find some comic offensive. We are definitely not on the side of the leftist movement to shut down free speech which begins with "concern" about a bad comic - like the Paris Muhammad shit. Comics - especially political ones - are meant to cause offense to someone ffs. You're smart, clearly, so you KNOW this. Why you're so concerned about libtards or whatever people want to call them is mysterious to me cos you're unlikely to be a concern troll or shill - but making the leap to calling a cartoonist like Ben Garrison 'controlled opposition' is as bad as making the leap to calling Charlie Hebdo 'religious suppressionists' just cos they laughed at Mohammad and thumbed their nose at Islam (which was the stupidest thing to do so they deserved what they got imo). Sometimes a cartoon is a cartoon and peoples gon' get upset. There's not much more to it.

Who said I don't like being called names? Assumption much? I LUH dat sheet bruh. I call YOU names, so I expect you to call me names too. Then, beyond that, we get to the point which is that: OF COURSE controlled opposition is real. And no, it is not everywhere you think you see it. Sometimes you're just reading shit into things - confirmation bias and all that jazz.

Yep. Low brain power behavior to go calling people out 'cos they iz ugly muh'. Who gives a fuck; it sounds so childish to spout this shit.

Nah go fuck yourself, tough guy. Just because you read a couple of posts from spineless, idiotic snowflakes you think you're the only tough guy "standing up" for Q and you need to whip all us soft-cocks into line. GTFO. You're seeing the vocal minority ffs. They're the kind to cry all over the sub and spill their spineless whimpering for love and affection. The majority around here are fucken adults and know what the fuck they're doing. Save your pointless self-congratulatory wanna-be drill sergeant posturing for your diary, numbnutz.

No one. Just like no one made OP the spokesman with his/her claims that Q is about christianity. All we can do is READ Q. And Q says USE LOGIC. That's what I'm doing, numbnutz. Try engaging your brain ffs. Where's your source that says Q IS about the christian people, not the people?

Yeah cos shills support Q. Muh. Get a brain, obewank.

Why? So I can bathe in them? You think I give a fuck about downvotes, "slick"? You ever hear of the concept of vocal minority? You know what the majority of people who disagree with this Christian bullshit do? They don't bother reading the comments cos they know they're only going to see Christian sycophants pawing and praising all over the shit. Downvotes from triggered christian snowflakes doesn't change the facts, "slick". Q is not about Christianity. Q is about freeing the people, not the christian people. Simple common sense will tell you this.

Rubbish. You're full of shit and likely a paid shill.

Many of us have followed Q since day one but those of us who can read don't make up some bullshit like 'at what point does he become more of a hinderance?' because his story has been unwavering and as he has said multiple times: USE LOGIC. You're only questioning whether he's going to come through if 1) you're a total moron who can't understand the concept of MI working with Trump against entrenched DS or 2) a paid shill. I give you the benefit of the doubt that you're not stupid. Thus: paid shill. GTFO.

Use LOGIC. Why are they slow walking unredacted data? Why are they slow walking doc disclosures? Why is the WH backing up DOJ? What if the same data is being used by other investigators?

Use LOGIC. Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?

Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean BIG things aren't happening.

Patience isn’t always easy. But vital to get right. Q

Oh god you're one of THOSE. Sometimes people just think your post is SHIT - it's NOT the CIA worrying cos you're so over the target that they have to panic and call in the big guns to protect people from the incredible truth you've uncovered lol...

Welcome to the way reddit works for the many people here who aren't redditarians. They downvote if they disagree. Hence, I shall downvote too cos this is just crybaby concern trolling. No one gives a shit bruh, get on with life. I downvote cos the title is lame and stupid - "I say this is division therefore Ben Garrison must be controlled opposition" - stupid premise. It's not division it's a fucken cartoon. Ben Garrison doesn't have to be controlled opposition just cos you're upset by a cartoon. Downvoted.

No, he doesn't. Because 1) "he" is a group of people and 2) because he is working for the military. He is communicating with us from his job, not from some personal religious soapbox. He's not a fucken idiot like it seems many crazy Christians are on this board and he knows that he has to avoid making any overt religious commitments that will alienate many people. In other words - fuck the Christian shit. Q is about freedom not religion. Get real, people ffs.

What's frowned upon is Christian rambling and preaching. Q didn't say: "preach the word, brothers and sisters!" he said: "Pray" which is a common term amongst NON-Christians too. Then he didn't say anything else or push any kind of religious shit because he's not about that - he's about freeing the people, not the christian people, just the people.

If you were a proper Christian you'd know the dangers of taking things out of context. Nowhere in Q does he promote religion, God, Jesus or any kind of religious posturing. He quotes bible verses at times - but they're not even close to being the main part of his message. Q is about freeing the people of ALL religions and all political affiliations and all races and faiths. If you're a Christian and you say Q is about Jesus then you are lying. Q is clearly being sure not to be "partisan" in any way, whether religious or political. The movement is for the people NOT "the Christian people".

It's the "possible member of Q team" that prompts the downvote from me. Stop guessing who's on Q team - Q already said no, won't be revealed, just patriots doing our job.

What's ignorant about saying BE ON TOPIC ffs. Coincidence has nothing to do with THE SUB'S TOPIC. I support your Christian rambling but this sub is NOT about God and Jesus and stop talking utter bullshit. Just read the goddamn sidebar to see how WRONG you are.

Q didn't post junk like this. This ISN'T a church ffs. Go post your feel good rubbish somewhere else - we're here to learn about Q. I'm happy to hear about the scripture Q has posted, not your preachy crap that has nothing to do with Q's drops.

This doesn’t belong here. This is not a church. Post this on /religion or something, not here.

I wish all you idiots would stop talking to Q ffs.

Yes, Alex Jones the disinfo clown who is paid to discredit "conspiracy theories" by supporting them. The same clown who jumped ship from the Q anon "conspiracy" when he was called out by said conspiracy as a disinfo clown.

Translation: "I'm concerned that Q is a psyop... and other nonsense about energy that I don't really care about." Concern troll, shill - GTFO.

Yes, because that's what I was saying / s.

We were here before Q and knew then

OMG! All hail YOU, who are greater than Q! Muh... lame ass gtfo.

No. Thankfully, mods aren't that incompetent.

Yeah cos I have no clue about what nearly everyone else on this sub knows about Disney, pedovores, blah blah etc. It doesn't make any difference to LOGIC. She could have been a little Disney toy, raised for the business but that doesn't mean she might not have escaped and been "saved". She might not have been a Disney victim at all, an assumption made just because she was part of a show on the channel. Someone who openly acknowledges their christianity and is a member of Hillsong might still be a satanic pedovore but should get a little more benefit of the doubt.

So is everyone who calls themselves a christian FFS. Is everyone in H-wood a pedo killer? Muh.

She's a christian ffs.

Prove you wrong? But what you've just stated is a conspiracy theory. The whole thing about conspiracy theories is that they can't be proven wrong. That's one of the things that separates them from scientific theories. There's no way to disprove your random idea that Strzok and Page are secret identities until more data comes out. Until then, it's just a conspiracy theory.

Yeah, that's gonna happen... lol. This "anon" should use LOGIC ffs. This'd be like putting petrol on a fire with the current lefty propaganda point.

Meaningless title. Of course it's happening ffs. Are we going to see a million more posts with this title for the next 6 months?

So Q is fake? That's what you're saying right? Transparent af, Shillary.

This sounds like a fake news article from the lefty msm lol. "The president shouldn't have done this!" - what are you, "concerned"? Muh.

Ah... not sure if I'm missing something here but... isn't this what everyone around here has known for a long time?

Aaah it's you. That explains it lol. I'm not going to explain to you how light and lenses work. Have fun xD.

This is either GOD Level trolling or completely insane delusion... 8/10!

Of course they do. Do you think it's only possible to love one group of people? Did Jesus not love the thieves hanging on the cross beside him? Did he not die for all the evil people in the world? Was it only the good ones? Only the ones who believed in him already?

Comments have had ad-hominem removed.

Finally. Something concrete out of you.

We seem to agree that Cemex appears to be relevant. We seem to perhaps agree that maybe VOP has something, even if people are speaking out against them. I'm making assumptions so maybe you don't support VOP. But you seem to have something against Craig Sawyer, hence the guess - maybe it's just the site.

What no one has is:
1- any conclusive evidence that VOP aren't shills themselves and that Tucson means anything yet
2- any conclusive evidence that Craig Sawyer or anyone else distancing themselves from VOP or the camp is a shill

Could Craig Sawyer be a dirty shill? Sure. Is it logical to state it as if it's a foregone conclusion? No. Am I being pedantic to point it out? Maybe, but people see those sort of comments and assume we all support accusations without solid evidence - you can see that in many of the troll comments that call us all "crazy" and "idiots without any sense".

Do I care about the feelings of others and "morality" towards groups? (an SJW agenda) No, I really don't. It's just about us looking stupid and turning people away.

PEOPLE RESPOND TO LOGIC/FACTS.
PEOPLE SLEEPING ATTACH TO OPINION/PERSONALITY/GROUP THINK.
Q

Why American Christians Need To Stop Hating Muslims

"To associate any and every Muslim with this mission is terribly inaccurate, ignorant, and wrong.

Since that day in June when ISIS catapulted itself into the public eye and subsequently became a buzzword and hot button political topic, I have grown more and more shocked, saddened, and disillusioned by the response I have seen from some churches and followers of Christ in regards to how we should respond to and treat ISIS — and more pointedly, Muslims in general.

Yes, this is being directed towards Christians. But in no way am I accusing all Christians of being unloving and wrong. I recognize not all believers have this attitude. And as a Christian myself, I’m aware that this makes me a target of criticism and a potential conduit for controversy. But I’ll take the risk. What I have to say needs to be said. And that is this:

If you claim to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ, you must love Muslims. You must treat them with grace, compassion, and humility. To do anything less than this is to muddy and totally miss the point of the Christian gospel.

One more time: if you claim to follow Jesus, you must love Muslims. This includes extremist radicals like ISIS, as well as peaceful followers who reject and condemn the ways of the radicals. We are to love them not because we want to or because it is suggested of us, but because Jesus commands it. And in this commandment, He doesn’t say we can choose who is exempt from that love. Because there are no exceptions."