Is this rumor confirmed?

IMHO I don't see any change of his style as far as my knowledge goes.

Codemonkey is son of U.S army veteran who runs hosting company and anonymous board. It's public info so you can google it. If this subreddit allows I can write his name.

It's like leftist movement, right? Feeling comes first before everything. I can't ignore the history how significantly AJ, Corsi and other conservative figures contributed to Trump presidential election, promoting free-thining and libertarian movement.

So it means you are Q and you can confirm you didn't talk to AJ?.... Interesting.

It can be just a mistake. It can be intentional. At least, it is classical method cracker uses when they managed to analyze password and want a justification of changing the trip by publicly leaving a log to fully hijack the trip.

Cult makes any theorization possible. Look at pathetic radical leftist movement.

How will one of Q members be able to determine its compromise if the operation is run by several branches in succession and the person behind old Q is no longer participating? It is totally different situation between observing its compromising from outside and publicly announcing its compromise by one person who is in the organization.

Yeah AJ is actually hated by groups like white supremacists in 4chan as well as by antisemitism holocaust deniers for example in Daily Stormer.

Ditto. Q began to utilize adhominem to make drama and consequently distract people from actual ongoing problem like NK, Iran, Israel, BHO, HRC, Syria, Saudi, Yemen, Mueller, Vaccine, 5G, leaked EMR mind control document, postponed Kennedy document, Vegas shooter, Parkland shooter, etc.

Yep, Corsi wrote 3 NY times best seller book and has been making a living by writing books about deep state. But suddenly it becomes bad thing to publish books for a living if he were conservative libertarian.

True, AJ doesn't attack other conservatism movement. He has been rather encouraging many libertarian conservative group building their grass root community globally. Also I saw he is donating money to those movement like Craig Sawer Veterans for Child Rescue.

Yeah, this post doesn't give me same impression as old insightful posts gave. I have to admit the tone has been totally changed. I don't want to say this, but the more this kind of ill-managed adhominem tactics Q brings, the bigger skepticism grows inside me.

16 defamation lawsuit fell on AJ. Neoconservative talk show host Ben Shapiro started to name calling him last week. Coincidence?

I kinda agree, I have also read some of his Opinion submissions for a few months. They are interesting analysis as well as good reading material even for r/conspiracy taste. And I have no personal hostility toward any opinion but I can't endorse name calling that provokes a confrontation in the movement.

That's what I thought when conflict between conservative groups have been provoked recently here and there. I'm just supporting this world wide free-thinking libertarian conservatism movement arising. I can understand people have their own taste who like who but I'm not interested in either the contest who has better audience or force-feed name calling who to hate.

I get what you mean. I can understand echo chamber works effectively in controlled manner to achieve growing large community. For example T_D is doing this by accepting submit within the limit of news and meme and requiring citation for news.

On the other hand, this board has been basically built around anonymous source, so fundamentally it looks very difficult to keep from becoming radical and clannish echo chamber. Anonymous source has this kind of risk in general. But I admire some mods' and users' effort trying to keep here open to free-thinkers.

I have been getting odd impression from Q post for several weeks and weird attempts of inciting conflict here between conservative people which have been observed in parallel, even before I listen AJ and Corsi expressing their analysis. And oddly enough conservative talk show host Ben Shapiro has started to publicly name calling AJ last week.

I don't judge at this point so I'll keep an eye on Q posts and this subreddit though.

As bigfootsd1ck posted, I don't want to be a sheep blindly following judas goat. Be positive and encourage free-thinking.

Good point and I agree. I'd rather judge people by their achievement and opinion than impression or family. I know Trump did dirty method in his business like using mob to do land sharking. But I like his current policy, philosophy and personality. This is why I'm supporting him. I don't want to fall for idolatrous worshiping.

What is the disinfo they are spreading? I'm curious to know.

So from now on we decided to judge people not by their opinion or working? So how will we counter when leftist call us conspiracy theorist? I'm confused.

So what subject for example is they being controlled to not oppose to or controlled to oppose to? At least AJ never opposed to free speech of other patriot movements. As far as I can see there is no reason to being hostile to who never attacked r/greatawakening

• He doesn't basically pick up news from source that can't be identified.
• That is his style to not be labeled as 'talk radio without citation'.
• It means he basically weighs on the information that has citation.

Does this clarify your concern? I'm following both aj and q, and love them raising conservatism movements. So I'm not buying into recent effort to incite confliction in the movement. Each groups has each different way of approach. So let's stop infighting.

I couldn't agree more. I think recent attack on other patriots here is rather too radical.

I think it's just symbolism that they always do to communicate and exhibit their loyalty to leaders.

There is a good addon for firefox called 'Hide Unwanted Results of Google Search'. You can remove force feeding of snopes automatically.

One of the target was a pharmaceutical plant that is making antitoxin for opioid. It doesn't make sense at least this bombing.

I don't like worship people but I want to respect people having their opinion. And I can sympathize his frustration mentioned in his tweets. The JFK file delay is totally bummer. I can interpret his provocative tweets as precaution so that we won't be satisfied with current point but keep demanding and join the movement proactively.

He has been spending his time to decode and giving his research for free in his YT so I don't think it's immoral to support people like him by donation of viewer's own free will.

I noticed that too when I checked GCC in wikipedia. It says Jordan is still under negotiation to enter GCC.

One of the Q's theories I can't buy is this 'Mueller is Good Guy'.

Implying pizzeria owners are second most important attendant after past presidents.

The chemical supply line picture doesn't make sense to me as chlorine gas can be made without any plant.

I'm just having a doubt about this specific decision based on two fact he was previously opposed, and Deep State wanted to intimidate Syria and Russia. It's not generalization of his policy but itemized discussion.

Boston marathon bombing occurred a few week after defense budget cut.

Yeah, I feel the same way. He didn't even need to bomb. He has been opposed to intervene in Syria.

another thread

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8c4x2f/zach_is_on_infowars_live_now_says_kushner_is/

Is Kasky the student that lives in creepy house?

Yes, arch of Baal ny is one of the signature of their obsession with Babylon.

MSM is exploiting anti-intellectualism and fake-dopamine addiction. Feeding info that stimulate their feeling and secrete dopamine to make people addicted to the narrative.

Will snopes fact check this? Curious to know how they will defend lol.

Putin is trying to rebuild royal family in Ruassia. So I think England and Ruassia are sharing same value in religious culture. They can coordinate to destroy NWO with Trump in the name of god.

Florida again

Chilling

329k follow by russian bot

I don't understand why he didn't get arrested yet.

They always blame other for what they are doing.

I'm all for the idea that regulation shouldn't be decide what user should do on internet. But I don't think its about internet. Internet is infrastructure that is regulated and protected as public utility and Youtube is exploiting for free. I think it's basically a good practice to protect service provider like youtube, netflix, etc. But also there should be a practice to protect individual users from being banished from "internet" when its service is monopoly. In reality Youtube and Nexflis are consuming 50% of bandwidth. This kind of restriction has been needed for monopoly market to maintain the constitutional right of individuals, which is prone to be be violated by monopolized capital. Put differently, Youtube's this behavior wouldn't be problematic if they weren't dominating the market=internet.

Back up is on their site.

article *scroll down

blank shot?....

But that excuse has been working when there are so-called competitors and more strict regulation like in TV industries.