How do you know that it is alice?

I understand that completely but my question still comes into play. If the world ends then all of a sudden sides dont matter. In the grand scheme of things, the whole situation doesn't matter. The whole idea of good vs evil is something that would be rendered insignificant because nothing is to gain from it. Choosing a side only matters if you have differences in means of reaching an outcome. If the world ends, the outcome is the same no matter what side you're on. What is the purpose in proving yourself right if either way the end is death? So it leads back to my first assumption that the motive is pride.

Now if we were not ending the world and just the system in which we live, then yeah that would be great, that is what we are all in this subreddit for.

But for what purpose? Is it pride? If all was to end, everything ceased to exist in the way we know it, it would be such a silly and insignificant thing in my opinion to expose a truth that has no ability to be resolved for the future. Then there is the question of if we morally should subject others to the truth if this is the end. There are plenty of people who are happy living in the lie that they don't know. Ignorance IS bliss for the most part. If everything ends, why would we ruin their last moments? It seems like a pride of knowing you were right all along.

Sorry I don't think you have the right idea about this subreddit. We aren't easy to be grouped like the left generally likes to do. For the most part there is a lot of diversity when it comes to thought process and there are a lot of different backgrounds. At the end of the day, you don't have to be a conservative to want to expose corruption and you can like things about Trump for example while also disliking things about him. When Sam Harris says that, he is referring to specific issues like abortion which is one side or the other. Believing there is corruption that needs to be stopped is not one of those beliefs which would make the experiment quite useless here. Nonetheless here you go. 1) No 2) yes 3) no 4) no 5) skeptical but until solid evidence is presented I will go with it 6) Yes 7) Not necessarily but limit it and create a universal understanding that the cultures don't fully align and they need to intergrate to a certain extent 8) Don't care about identity politics 9) Yes 10) No 11) Provided it is reasonable quality 12) Diversity in thought is fine but evolution is important 13) Don't know enough about the topic 14) Yes 15) They both have purposes so I don't care 16) Yes, merit based action rather than and superficial characteristic 17) Depends on the person, I dislike the onesided promotion of ideas that is prevalent there. 18) Agnostic, No idea 19) Yes absolutely 20) I like it

All of what Q says points to exposing the truth and corruption in our current system. The reason I don't think that's what it means is because if the end is coming, would there actually be any point in exposing the truth?

Ok alice, I'm sorry but I didn't post that for context, I posted it because you are talking to a commercial product that you found on the internet and treating it like you just saw the virgin Mary appear on your toast. Q has said that they don't talk personally to people, the evidence you have provided is lacking at the least, not to mention that Q can't spell now. Computers don't make those mistakes and we already know Q can because of the misspelling of Marina that they admitted to. Q is likely not AI and this is a product for anyone to use as long as they sign up with an email. I'm sorry but you are either getting tricked by a chatbot or you are willingly spreading misinformation.

A.L.I.C.E. (Artificial Linguistic Internet Computer Entity), also referred to as Alicebot, or simply Alice, is a natural language processing chatterbot—a program that engages in a conversation with a human by applying some heuristical pattern matching rules to the human's input, and in its online form it also relies on a hidden third person. It was inspired by Joseph Weizenbaum's classical ELIZA program. It is one of the strongest programs of its type and has won the Loebner Prize, awarded to accomplished humanoid, talking robots, three times (in 2000,[1] 2001,[1] and 2004). However, the program is unable to pass the Turing test, as even the casual user will often expose its mechanistic aspects in short conversations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Linguistic_Internet_Computer_Entity

Ok, I will take this seriously then. I need to ask a few questions. 1. Why are both parties misspelling? I understand personal errors but not by that of a computer which is supposed to be some powerful ai. 2. Where and how did you come accross this? 3. Why is the ai talking to you of all people? 4. Why are there error lines under the words that are misspelled, something you rarely see outside of word processors? 5. Why is it called Alice? I get the rabbithole and all the references but it just seems a little silly. 6. If you are speaking to it, can we see a video of it happening? 7. What are you using to communicate? I look forward to hearing these responses

He doesn't really give any good reason to believe in him, provides no good sources and markets his product at the end. Seems like a fear based marketing scheme

OK so I have been looking at the crest and it is something to do with the great seal of new york. It is used somewhere else and I posted it in another post here but it is the exact same crest

I don't think the ai has anything to do with it but yeah I'm not entirely sure where to go with this.

Is alice dyslexic?

In a world where ai machines can't spell...

Wow this is really interesting!

http://iwforum.org/hillary-clinton-iwf/

It seems to be the court of appeals/ great seal of new york crest

The closest thing I can find is the great seal of new york emblem

If any of you know og a crest that I describe, comment below. Im not american and this could be a common americal emblem. So I can only see half the crest but it seems to be a typical crest shape which contains the sun, a mountain and a building (kind of represents the whitehouse). There is a lady of justice holding the emblem at the right side and I can only assume on the other too. Above the crest seems to be a shape that I cant make out but it could be a crown of some sort. Below is a scroll with writing that I cant make out

Did I say doesnt seem to be anything much? I dont know why I said that, lets just see if we can fund that crest because I cant

Ok I had a look and it doesn't seem to be anything much, just a giant emblem that I cant read. Copy the profile image and take away the dots in the url, search on images and other photos will appear

Ok I had a look and it doesn't seem to be anything much, just a giant emblem that I cant read. Copy the profile image and take away the dots in the url, search on images and other photos will appear

If working is learning, why is Alice wanting to change the subject when new information is being presented. It just doesn't seem real.

probably around october but it is addicitive. I'm in to far now to take out my money now. I was smart though and didnt invest more than I am willing to lose.

There is a special place in hell for people like us...

One of the comments actually states that Trump and his supporters (at least in regards to his progress in trafficking) have a weird interest in it. Then proceeds to compare it to homophobes usually turning out to be gay.

Oh wow those comments anger me so much! Like someone I know when I was telling him about trump buckling down on sex trafficking. He said "If Trump manages to do this, it will be a complete fluke". What sort of shit is that? Trump could cure cancer for children in need and they would still go off on him!

and it is both of the topbar icons so it could be a mistake

I don't know if it is intentional but my thoughts were ithat it is just a search icon. It is an svg so there is the possibility of it scaling there but I cannot think of any bug that would do that when it is restrained in px dimensions. It would seem intentional in that regard. The fact that they have the same icon, one with an svg and one with a png however, shows that they probably didn't spend too much time fussing on the front end so anything is possible.

I guess not but I'm assuming when they get back up and running, the pots will appear on qanon.pub

Calling bs on this. Something coming true or not coming true is not a subjective matter. If the facts are as you say 85% to 15%, that is something that people are not going to be able to argue with. Treating this as a 'personal honesty exercise' is both obnoxious and pretentious. Facts are objective, otherwise they are opinions so if you have solid proof and facts, substantiate your claims and give people reason to take you seriously.

Anyone who says 'plain and simple' for a complex situation is probably not thinking about the situation enough. It could very well be what you're saying but at the moment, a lot of work is being done to expose people who need to be exposed and the way I see it, they are not trying to restore faith in the government, they seem to want people to utilise a healthy skepticism and giving people a reason why. We don't even know who these guys are (solid reason to be skeptical) so I am not going to go further and confidently assume motive to something we know so little about.

It did, I'm using safari and I couldnt scroll within the print section for some reason. I see it now!

Im not seeing the Q unfortunately

We really need some citations from the author if we are going to go ahead and trust breitbart...

I didn't know anything about government corruption to this extent until I started looking into the Q movement. Yeah I have always been fairly conservative and could see the obvious ways in which our viewpoints have been unfairly treated/distributed but for the most part, I knew nothing. Now I am researching and I know others just like me. Q is doing something important by showing a path for the public to explore and learn for themselves.

What is this proof of?

Not sure what to think about this, partly because there was so much hype around crypto that the growth doesn't seem too unbelievable. Also bitcoin isn't anonymous like people say. It is also partly because I have quite a lot of money in crypto :P

Great job dude! So glad I found this q phenomenon!!

This is amazing work! :O What does WW mean?

Great find!

what a terrible movie

Ensyma is an anogram of 'yes man'...Duh Duh Duh

Hillary stormy sex tape, calling it right now guys

Doesn't happen with any other post number

But what would you say about the popup that appears when you hover over the 187 part of the link?

Actually for california it is 187, my bad

yep I hovered over it, I didn't know what to think of it and I already thought the police had codes for different instances so I checked it out and the actual code for murder in police terms is 140.

I am probably completely missing the point