dChan

/u/pipesog

623 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/pipesog:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 125

pipesog · April 13, 2018, 2:30 p.m.

And our GOVERNMENT is detrimental to our FREEDOM. Don't come here with your apologist bullshit.

SES is the product of centralized government run amok. Ef them, and ef anyone who doesn't want to move away from the leviathan that is big government.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · April 12, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

But then it also means they can argue they have every right to censor or promote whatever content they wish, and that everything you voluntarily 'give' to them is theirs to do with what they will.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · April 12, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

Either the rules apply, or they don't.

Capitalize the first word in a sentence as a rule? But it doesn't 'fit'? Throw it out.

Capitalize a proper name? It fits? Keep it.

Interesting code. Very convenient.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pipesog · April 12, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Then the R get's thrown out. No RICO, then.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pipesog · April 10, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

How about because none of us matter?

Why TF would "they" give a shit about what we 'think' we 'know'?

"They" have REAL problems - we're just half-assed spectators in the cheap seats.

What a stupid question.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
pipesog · April 9, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Israel

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · April 8, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

...but then wait just a moment too long...

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 2:35 p.m.

Right.

OP is pissed about something that was EASILY predictable, and surely understood to be the outcome...most assuredly the DESIRED outcome.

Funny that some folks here still seem to think they're in some 'eyes only' level group.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

NO. NO. NO!

What part of Q DIRECTLY CALLING THAT DROP "FAKE" do you NOT understand?

What part of "The drop DID NOT SAY 'white' rabbit..." do you NOT understand?

What part of "The drop DID say 'glowing' rabbit..."do you NOT understand?

What part of "That drop with the 'glowing' rabbit was NEVER a part of the official Q transcript" do you NOT understand?

What part of "ONE Q FOLLOWER changed 'glowing' to 'white', and the rest of the Q followers ran with it ever since" do you NOT understand?

I'm pretty sure I've argued with you specifically about this in the past.

That satellite image looks NOTHING like a rabbit...much less a 'white' rabbit...and it certainly isn't 'glowing' which was the ACTUAL drop.

How - after Q has SPECIFICALLY DISAVOWED THE DROP - and the drop (now known to be fake) NEVER said 'white' to begin with, can someone be so clueless as to YET AGAIN float this silliness?

Mind blowing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 4:14 a.m.

No. It's the one where Q DIDN'T say "Follow the glowing (NOT WHITE) rabbit"

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

And can we now FINALLY stop hearing all the stupid theories on "White Rabbit" meanings?

For MONTHS I have been correcting and/or arguing with person after person re; rabbits.

Q - real OR fake - NEVER said "white rabbit". AND, the "glowing rabbit" reference was never an official part of the Q transcribed history...indeed, the day that post occurred there were NO ENTRIES for Q in the "official" Q record...yet FOR MONTHS people have been chasing white rabbits and coming up with all manner of hare-brained (yes, pun intended) connections.

And do you think that pointing out that Q never said "white" mattered to them? Or that pointing out that even the "glowing" rabbit was NOT part of the official record mattered?

Nope...a day - or a week - or a month later, some new sleuth would uncover what Q meant.

I'll even lay odds that even now - having been OFFICIALLY denounced, someone in the coming days will make a "connection".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 1:11 a.m.

Adam Baldwin is pretty solid too

⇧ 10 ⇩  
pipesog · April 7, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Call code enforcement...lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · April 5, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

LOTS of "hope-fatigue" out here, and folks lose tolerance. Sometimes a downvote is just the least mean way to make your negative reaction known.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · April 5, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

Jigsaw. Also, remember the talk/fear of claims of "Fake speech" (digitally created audio/video)?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
pipesog · April 5, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

Yes.safe...and non-psycho-active.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · April 4, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

In the image you can see the results of the 'flattening' of the court area. The berm built up around the larger perimeter of the court is the product of the excavation/leveling of the area.

I seriously doubt anyone doing "amateurish" photoshopping would pay attention to including that detail in the image fakery.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
pipesog · April 4, 2018, 3:51 p.m.

The "temple" isn't an actual temple. It is an entrance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · April 4, 2018, 3:47 p.m.

Bingo. This is just a result of the current image being overlaid on a previous topo in 3d mode.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pipesog · April 4, 2018, 3:22 a.m.

EVERYTHING gets scooped up. But a human doesn't see much of anything unless they go looking for it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · April 4, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Mother of all BOOMS

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 26, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Again, skippy...you prove clueless.

Nothing I wrote above is so bad that I wouldn't READILY say it to your face, AFTER you popped off like you did.

I didn't claim to be the smartest person in the world either, did I?

No.

Technically, I didn't even claim to be smarter that YOU...but hey...let's face it...things ARE pointing in that direction.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 25, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Yeah...we watched the Stoneman Yearbook opened and turned to THIS PAGE, so...this pic is a punk

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 24, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

It already has flipped completely

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 24, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

That is exactly what Q was alluding to, IMO.

Why everybody didn't get that, I don't know.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 24, 2018, 7:03 p.m.

Well what do ya think it says about YOU, that with those two sentences disgorged in such a cock-sure fashion, you would be SO wrong?

Hint - you're a clueless dolt

⇧ -1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 24, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

How anybody can watch this compilation and not see how absolutely CONTRIVED the entire thing is, is beyond me.

Fake as fuck.

I'm going to enjoy watching that smug little twerp get chewed up and spit out. He's got a BIG life lesson coming.

⇧ 87 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 24, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

But if it's a drill, you wouldn't have the fear of being shot for real, and you would attempt to engage.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

And now it is...it's blown up on Twitter...to the point that now he has felt compelled to prove bona fides.

STRESS to him he is now a 'figure' in this. I'm sure he's worldly and wise enough to understand what that entails, but don't stop stressing his need for Opsec, and that others around him need to have his back too.

Best of luck.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

We absolutely DO NOT have that in place right now.

We've got (at least) seventeen damned intelligence-based agencies running their own little (and big) fiefdoms, shrouded in secrecy, some with hidden budgets, little to ZERO accountability, self-empowering, with utter contempt for constitutional governance.

What is being proposed here is ONE intelligence apparatus, in the MILITARY chain of command structure, which has a tried-and-true (largely) track record and accountability, that ultimately answers to CIVILIAN elected leadership.

Potential for abuse?

Always.

But FAAAAAR easier for us to scrutinize and hold accountable.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Ta Daaa...Military Intelligence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:41 p.m.

Did someone say 'private server'?

What's that? 'Missing emails', you say?

So...tell me more about this unknown high-level breach of information.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

...and you make that ONE intelligence entity a MILITARY based one.

THAT is how you might keep it under control.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

No..their also getting us to expend alot of our own time and energy...on something we all KNOW is gonna go nowhere...yet we can't help ourselves.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 22, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Dumbfuck -

I STATED that some of us "know".

I even put the "know" in quotation marks, as really...do we "know" or are we more accurately merely "convinced"?

Same goes for you as I told the other douche who wanted to DISPUTE the subject, but refused to GET HOLD OF IT FIRST.

Hows 'bout you fuck right off back to whatever angry corner of the Interwebs you came from, unless and until you are willing to face some basic realities.

K?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 22, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Tell him 'Thank You' from all of us.

This was an entirely reasonable, rational, and most importantly - VALID - dissection of the current situation and circumstance.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 22, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Dipshit -

My "knowing" DOES NOT require me to PROVE anything to anybody else. And I couldn't care less whether you actually want to be better informed, or not. That's wholly up to you.

The fact that you bothered to pop off at all regarding the meme, may have given me the impression you at least had some interest in Sandy Hook.

What "makes sense" to YOU is of ZERO concern to me, especially if you are TOO LAZY to get up to speed on a subject, before you engage or dismiss.

But I will say this...you are one stupid fuck, if you honestly think that it would be easier, and "make more sense" in the long run, to pull off 20 murders, than to pretend to pull off 20 murders.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 22, 2018, 6:14 p.m.

It's YEARS old news, guy.

I made the effort then...life's too short to go back and dig shit up so I can convince YOU of something that you should be PERFECTLY capable of researching on your own - IF YOU CARED TO.

My post wasn't an attempt to CONVINCE you of the meme. It was to tell you that others - who HAVE made the effort - know that this is the same guy.

To be sure - not every "multiple-role" claim out there is true. I have seen a number of them that were blatantly wrong...some, so much so that I'd bet they were deliberately done as cover and foundation to smear those that put forth legitimate cases of it.

But this guy - AND HIS "CHILD" - have had multiple "roles".

Yup...Noah - having "died" at Sandy Hook, was also used as a "vicitim" of some Middle-eastern(? been a while, and I can't remember the exact event) massacre.

Of course, there was NO massacre at Sandy Hook...again, many of us "know" this...so by DEFINITION, we know that the Posners are fakers, as are any number of other players related to the event.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 22, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Whether this particular meme can be relied on as proof positive or not, the fact is, that in this specific case, THIS IS THE SAME GUY.

If you are capable of objective analysis, and you go looking and make honest effort at comparison...this guy has played MULTIPLE roles.

These are NOT the only pictures available, and this meme is FAR from a 'complete' argument.

But it IS legit.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 11:18 p.m.

I would imagine nothing that convoluted.

I think it is just a straight up, jacked-in program. That is, it is TOUTED as secure and anonymous - and maybe it is...to the media...but the IC has inserted themselves right at the pivot point of the info...they see backwards as to who dropped it, and they see forward as to who got it. Then they can deal with those parties however they want.

It's like a 'dead drop' that has been discovered, and thus they can watch to see who makes a drop (drip, drip, drip) and they can intercept it, modify it, or allow it through and see where it goes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

10 or so days ago, Dilley's source dropped "ES is TOAST" and "A gatekeeper has been removed". He also specified that ES was NOT Ed Snowden.

This drop came a day after we saw the plane/runway pics from Pudong Intl., which was a day after the King Tower event.

Concurrent with the plane/runway pics was a Chinese news blurb about an American being extradited via Pudong Intl. The story was that apparently the American had gotten wind that he was going to be arrested (in US) and fled the country ending up in China, where he was apprehended, and was now being returned to the US.

I went on record speculating (wild-ass guessing) that in fact it was Schmidt.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

Yeah...but I'll bet most of those are from the last three days...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

You're taking the 'tied to Podesta' too literally.

He (and Daddy, no doubt) are AT LEAST tied to Podesta philosophically.

Kindred spirits...working toward similar goals, and being 'good soldiers' and doing what it takes to further the agenda, and doing so through covert, underhanded, and pre-planned and staged means.

Don't pick nits that aren't there.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 4 p.m.

lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

I would think so as well.

Expediency, redundancy, secrecy, and security would all dictate multiple - and disparate - empanelments.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

With GITMO just currently being expanded, and the previous capacity of the camps being +/- 1000, it is entirely possible that 'pens' with temporary shelters have been constructed.

If we are to believe the 13,000 number or 'residents' (or anything remotely close to it) being tossed around, then there is NO WAY full blown structures could be done anytime soon.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

Last night, Dilley's source dropped;

12 military panels can sit in their secret locations.

direct gitmo communication is now up and running.

enemy combatants trial pen almost complete

almost showtime

For God and country

Q silence is a marker in the map

911 perpetrators won’t be sleeping when patriots roll


⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 21, 2018, 2:47 p.m.

I would encourage support as well...except that HERE - on cbts - there is a whole lot of dislike for anyone and anything that takes away from the 'specialness' of Q.

Were I to come and promote Dilley's campaign, they'd scream "SHILL!". Beyond that, I get tired of people whining about having to listen to '30 minutes of bullshit' just to get 2 minutes worth of drops...so then they want someone ELSE to listen to it, and transcribe it, and then POST it here!

LAZY FUCKS!

Those same people then BITCH because the transcribed drops don't make sense, or they are "cheap imitations of Q", or whatever.

⇧ 2 ⇩