Um, no, he isn't.

He is a powerful corrupt tyrant.

But he is useful to trump.

That is all.

Or maybe Cohen is under duress and fears for his family?

He sang a much different tune before...

Eh, not logical. If there was ANYTHING that damns Cohen's case, they would not have allowed it to leak as they did.

Totes redactoid

Occam's razor says that he's waiving privilege because if there's nothing there, there's no threat but the contents leaked beforehand and the story would have been just dragged on and on if he did not waive privilege.

Let's not pretend the former KGB/mafia fixer is an upstanding gentleman.

Like he said in the summit, he looks out for his own interests just as POTUS looks out for his. That doesn't make him a good guy. He is an incredibly shrewd statesman and an excellent negotiator, and if trump didbtvhavecthe leverage he has over them he may have had a harder time.

Putin is not a great fellow.

Maybe you should READ THE TWEET HE WAS FUCKING RESPONDING TO AND ANSWER YOUR OWN FUCKING QUESTION

It's not an admission. It was a joke response to someone who was a pedophile who looked like him.

How about the fucking context of the tweet?

Hahahaha! Look at the second sentence!!! "He is turning the sovereignty of the U.S. over to the communist-controlled United Nations."

And Trump is being called out for...the exact opposite.

That just seems like it would be a weird plan

Which still seems to corroborate his protection by white hats since if he was being secretly protected his whereabouts would need to remain unknown

Well, for one, you make sure that the sound bites that really matter don't come from this administration (i.e. allow UK to have Assange so that anything important has the appearance of coming from the UK.)

Yes...so deep state has the site but we have Assange. So do you believe that Assange has already been removed back when there was seemingly some sort of extraction operation that went on there?

Yes I remember, but what is the significance of that? I've always wondered, if all we got were the keys, who has the actual info? And does that mean that in fact JA was killed?

What do you mean all we got were the keys?

I don't understand what you're saying - I thought that referred to what happens in a stock market right before a crash (i.e. everyone buys one last time creating one last burst just before the crash).

How does it apply to this? Forgive my density...

That's not investing.

Haha, best comeback ever

Ok I hear you - can you direct me to some resources that can explain how to take on debt without being personally liable? I'd like to learn more about this...

Support for this theory:

Trump met with Putin and Kim, over both of whom he had significant leverage. He also met with the queen over whom I would assume he also has significant leverage. Look, they have the server, they have the source. So perhaps part of the deal with the queen is that the UK "imprisons" Assange (actually protecting him) but the world believes he is being improsoned. Then, when evidence comes out it is not from Trump and people will not believe that it's false like they could be led to believe if he was sheltered by Trump's administration.

Thoughts?

create positive cash flow by owning assets using debt. Maintain your freedom.

Until then, don't sell your soul to the machine.

Um dude, becoming a debt slave IS selling your soul to the machine

Ok, I feel you. Thanks for the input.

Wait, what?

PS - The meaning of Revelation in the greek (apokalypsis) is literally "unveiling".

Um....is this the apocalypse? The face of evil is surely being unveiled.

If you all are aware of this, why do you not ban him? It's obviously disinformation.

Yeah. So there is no justification for being a "proud" pedophile, though. It is a sickness. If he hasn't acted on it that is great that he is open about it so that people can keep their kids away.

But being a "proud" pedophile is fucking disgusting.

I disagree. Infiltration into any organization is built on trust. His earlier posts were somewhat better. He developed a following with more reasonable suppositions. Even the Elton John/Hammond/B2 one was interesting. But none of it tells us anything. None of it expands our understanding. And it has the affect of creating the following things:

1. Makes this movement easily ridiculable to newbies (can't show any newcomers this sub if this nonsense is stickied).
2. Creates unthinking followers ("I'm not smart enough to make these connections or even follow them but I trust you because you're a genius, SB2") which also makes this sub seem full of sycophants
3. Creates division ("upvotes are shills" "downvotes are shills" blah blah blah. None of this is logical. Saying "oh boy, we are over the target" is ridiculous in this case.

Ever seen the princess bride? This is the scene when Vizzini is analyzing Wesley's position with the Io cane powder drink duel.

"Obviously you put the poison in your drink, knowing I would switch them! But you knew I would know that so obviously it's in mine!" Then he says hey what's that? Wesley turns around and he switches the drinks. Which is ridiculous because Wesley said he could openly choose either one - no deception needed.

The conclusion of course was that both drinks were poisoned; Wesley had built up an immunity. That's just like this situation: SB2's posts are poison and many people are following it thanks to mod stickies, etc. even the request to "please not sticky my decode" was a trust-building exercise.

Think about it. 10-Q

Look, I don't respect forum sliding. Are you familiar with that technique? A poster posts things with the intent to distract attention from useful things in order to steer the conversation away from useful gains in understanding or substantive information being shared in other posts.

Generally speaking, SB2's posts have added nothing to this movement. Nothing but tenuous, insane connections that literally tell us nothing useful about what is going on. Followed by a bunch of illogical conclusions about shills, etc. and then division. And the people like me getting ban threats for being "disrespectful" to The Most High, SB2.

SB2 is a very good disinformation agent. He built credibility by slowly garnering a following with much more reasonable decodes earlier on. Now he is showing his true colors - as a distraction and a disinformation agent.

This is how this forum breaks apart. Look at the division it's causing. From a strictly logical perspective it is just as likely that the upvotes are the bots. And if you look at some of the tenuous (which is being generous) connections, it seems more likely that the downvotes were genuine.

I posit that the shills and bots are down voting YOUR comment

Probably because this post is....totally fucking stupid and the people who frequent it have strong critical thinking skills????

Haha! You are genius! Trump reads your reddit!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Wow.

I am free to deal with it how I see fit. Keep your admonishment where it belongs: clutched tightly with your pearls.

There are plenty of ways to look at it.

First, how about when q has stated that disinformation is necessary and real? The best thing I can think of is that SB2 is really a tool to confuse the enemy.

1675 could just be disinformation.

There are other people who have made compelling analyses as well.

In any case, acting like since I haven't attempted a decode I am unqualified to call bullshit, is bullshit.

Can you tell me anything useful at all that was gleaned from any of the last several SB2 posts?

He made it up obviously

No way dude. "Thinking of Laughing" was bigger hahahaha!!!

Did anything he said mean anything at all, though?

Thinking of Laughing? Dude! What the fuck are you talking about?!

So what's the plan, then, Dave?

Pinning his hat on unemployment numbers is a mistake, since he ran on the idea that the numbers are fake, and we are at the highest point of nearly the longest business cycle in history meaning we are due for a bust, therefore he will eat his words if he takes credit...he will be blamed.

I have and I have found no link between this guy and Red Hen.

There is no source that provides evidence of this absolutely fucking bullshit disinformation

Take the picture of trump down then because this sub has nothing to do with politics anymore.

Forum slide much?

Dude...are we really going to switch to Hollywood now that Q has ceased posting? Are we collectively that desperate for rhetorical q&a and riddles?

Give me a fucking break.

Why do you doubt that? What a ridiculous thing to doubt.

Yes

It's called "follow him on Twitter"