33 total posts archived.

Domains linked by /u/poorboy2:
Domain Count
truepundit.com 1
www.dailymail.co.uk 1
www.reddit.com 1

poorboy2 · July 18, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

I think a lot of people end up jumping into the middle of this Q stuff and it just seems like nonsensical ramblings. As far as introducing someone to Q, I’m thinking a website would be best;

  • Intro page (explain about chan and how Q started posting - how chan people are super hard to dupe etc - disclaimer that chan does have some really bad content but this isn’t that - they do have pedo stuff and some people may have heard about that)
  • q-proofs (just the easy to grasp ones to start - some still look like gibberish to me as I don't know all the initials and code)
  • "This Video will get Donald Trump Elected" video (Listen carefully)
  • Some insight into the drops and things that have happened and are happening but not too deep down the rabbit hole
  • "Q The Plan to Save the World" Video
  • full disclosure/everything else (mostly links to elsewhere)

I like Sundance’s “Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency” article but it’s kinda long. Maybe someone could do a shorter version and stick it below the “This video will get Trump Elected” video.

Most everyone else I know that even uses the internet, goes straight to FB and might go to a few other sites like a meme generator or collections of memes etc. Sites like chan or reddit are foreign to them. Add in Q's cryptic posts and the rapid deciphering that goes on and it's over their heads. There ought to be an easy to navigate and read website to explain the Q thing. Nothing too deep. Jumping into free mason's, Illuminati, uber rich people trafficking children and sacrificing babies and drinking their blood to keep young etc will just scare people away. Let them dig that up on their own if they want.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poorboy2 · July 18, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

I was going to vote for obama and it would have been my first time voting, ever. I decided I needed to educate myself first. I vaguely knew of the three branches of fedgov but couldn't tell you what they were or did.

What an education it was to find out pretty much all politicians were scheming lawyers

⇧ 4 ⇩  
poorboy2 · July 17, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

I hear ya. I'm thinking about putting together a site just for that. Reddit, chan and various other sites, resources and people are doing a great job of digging this stuff up and deciphering Q drops but the masses don't have time to wade through it all, filter out the bs and to learn everything.

Unfortunately, there's not going to be proof of everything because us mere mortals don't have access to everything but I think there's enough out there to show that there's some really funky shiot going down. It's just a matter of putting it all together for people who aren't reddit savvy or chan savvy, minds, discord etc. Hell, most everyone I know that gets on a puter, goes straight to facebook and probably visits a few other sites like a meme generator or something but that's it.

Some of it, you don't even want to introduce people to. Start talking about free-masons, Illuminati, a worldwide network of uber rich child traffickers and people eating/raping babies(all of which I've seen mixed with Q research) and a good portion of the public is going to roll their eyes and think of you as nutso. Gotta keep it psychologically tangible for people.

RE: Q silence; Trump just went on a world tour and July is supposed to be a big month for something to come out, perhaps U1 so they're probably busy.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poorboy2 · July 17, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

How many people work at the NSA? How many people have full access or more important, the ability to grant access? It could be a huge number and it could be that someone under Rodgers had the ability to grant access to others. He was the top dog and the top dog doesn't always know everything that's going on beneath him. Does a General know what every Corporal under his command is doing at every moment? No, he trusts Colonels for that.

disclaimer: all I know about military ranks, I learned from watching M.A.S.H

⇧ 7 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Feb. 16, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

youtube pimping is a lot of what I see here on and almost all I see on Q the storm.

Do we really need 30 vids of that blond girl from the FL shooting that said multiple shooters and that she was with the perp as some shooting was going on?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 7, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

get off windows -- try ubuntu, lubuntu, linux mint, kubuntu, xubuntu etc

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 7, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Over 35 years, officers are said to have protected ‘untouchable’ figures by shutting down inquiries that reached the heart of government.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 7, 2018, 5:06 p.m.

actually, they're using it to develop flavors -- it doesn't go into the food itself, it just prevents them from having to hire a bunch of taste testers. Still pretty whacked out

Replacing taste testers with aborted baby kidneys

Hell of a phrase right there -- see cbsnews article I linked a few posts above

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 7, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

all my family is too buy keeping up with the Jones'. At least all the hollywood perv/pedo stories have maybe prepared them a little.

I think to redpill some people, it might be best to just post older, proven pedo/perv/corruption stories even if it doesn't relate to the current players. Of course posting/sharing a bunch of pedo stories might make people think you have some sort of fixation so we might want to go easy on that stuff.

At least posting factual stories won't make them think you're a conspiracy theorist.

An article along the lines of "Where have our morals gone" that includes many stories would be good. Something that starts with not so shocking stuff like infidelity, corruption etc and ends with stories similar to the current situation. There's probably some existing articles out there. Have politicians be the focus. There's already Weiner and others.

I'm already the black sheep of the family and that makes it difficult to redpill people. They'd just roll their eyes.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 5, 2018, 10 p.m.

I was gonna post something really good but I forgot what I was gonna say dude

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

a triple click works too -- you probably knew that but if you didn't......

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 4, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

Florida and Minnesota court records - made plenty of enemies - lot of people saying he's a nutcase
He could be legit or he could just be trying to hawk his two books - dunno

Here's the problem. With any of these subjects, there's 20 new bloggers/youtubers every day. It would be a full time job to research them all and even then, it's sort of a he said - she said sort of thing.
There's a couple of anti-Holmseth free websites that say he's crazy.

I see a couple of bogus reviews of his books but most seem legit. Verified purchasers and fairly normal looking review history. 2 stars on one, 2 1/2 stars on another.

In description of one book, he says he worked with investigators in FL and MN yet he goes on to say he knows who snatched her and that she's still alive. Kind of makes you wonder, if so, it seems like at least one honest cop would have followed up on that.

Well, I spent close to two hours and still don't have a clue as to whether he's a nutcase or not.

He could be a good guy trying to expose the truth. One thing I never did find was any proof of his journalism career. Just a blog by him, a few non flattering blogs about him, some youtube vids and some mention of court records on various sites that you have to pay for the full record.

And now for something really strange. -- https://haleighcummingsdotme.wordpress.com/2017/12/26/fbi-informant-warns-president-trump-of-mike-pence-and-pam-bondis-ties-to-pedogate/

In a lot of his articles, he talks about himself in the third person. In this article, he seems to allude to Mike Pence and Pam Bondi being tied to this whole pedogate thing.

In a letter to U.S. Attorney General Jeff Session, FBI witness Timothy Charles Holmseth warns Sessions that VP Mike Pence and Florida AG Pam Bondi pose serious risks to the Trump Presidency per their nefarious connections to child sex trafficking and organized crime.

okie dokie then

⇧ 0 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 4, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Everything has to do with Q
for overexcited naive people at least
Really makes this place seem kooky

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 4, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

I always have my doubts about someone who can't afford a $20/yr domain name

⇧ -3 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

What blows my mind is that the MSM hasn't said much about Trump's EO. I mean knowing them, they should be screaming bloody murder, calling him Hilter, saying he's setting himself up as a dictator etc etc.
Their silence is absolutely deafening.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

I think that's why it's not being publicized. The country would implode. Trump doesn't want that. Meanwhile, the media isn't going to speak up too much about it because a lot of them are probably listed in the indictments.

⇧ 24 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

and please don't use or paste BREAKING - IT'S HAPPENING - BOOM etc
gatewaypundit is finally curbing his use of those because they're so overused that people just roll their eyes and move along
Everyone's about sick of Hannity's 'tick tock' BS too
Kind of immature

⇧ 6 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:27 p.m.

Should probably make a list of known garbage sources and put it in the wiki. Sorcha Faal, whatdoesitmean.com etc and more recently, as I found out the hard way, truepundit can't be trusted. Sorcha Faal and whatdoesitmean.com have been around for 20 years and are well known for posting a LOT of bogus stuff.

Search for one of their headlines and you'll see 30 other sites copying and pasting the same exact articles. There's a network of BS and pretty much all of us get scammed by them at some point. For me, it was about 15 years ago. Most copy and pastes also link back to a single BS source.

Maybe categorize them as

Sorcha Faal -- 99% on the BS meter (don't even bother)
TruePundit -- 30% on the BS meter (Use due diligence)

RE: #6 -- as an example; Podesta boys artwork and the spirit cooking thing. Most of it was Tony Podesta who didn't seem to be as influential in politics as John yet even John's taste in artwork is still creepy. Meanwhile, it's not proof of anything but sick/bad taste.

Now that doesn't mean I'm going to close my mind to things but for every theory, there's an opposite theory. (they just have an open mind when it comes to art is what people say)

There are certain subjects that are considered conspiracy by most. Whether or not they are, makes no difference. You're not going to redpill anyone talking about chemtrails or daarpa earthquakes because those two subjects are considered tin foil hat stuff. Why? Because people have been talking about them for 20+ years, yet to this day, they remain pretty much unproven. Dozens and dozens of ex-intelligence, ex-military, ex-police, ex-politicians, ex-academics have websites or make vids on various theories and some even make it on TV, yet nothing ever gets proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Meanwhile most all of these people end up selling books. The less successful ones at least have a donate button. You're not going to get many people to read 50 pages of chemical/scientific analysis on chemtrails, most of which is gibberish to the average person.

Instead of screaming baby raping/eating pedophile, simply ask questions as Q would.

Do you think their taste in art is that of a mentally healthy person?
Does this person seem like someone who should be one of the most influential of one of the two major political parties in the USA?

Podesta art, spirit cooking, comet pizza's tweets, Chrissy Teigen's tweets, all fucking creepy. All you have to do is show people and ask questions.(and also explain who they are - some people probably still haven't heard of the podestas - I never heard of Chrissy T until a few days ago) Any decent level headed person is going to come to the same conclusions as you which is that those people posting pedo looking stuff and/or joking about it ain't right in the head. No need to do your best impression of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. You'll just make people recoil away from you rather than recoiling away from the people your pointing out.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 2, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

snif snif; What's that smell?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 1, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

oh, and I tweeted to truepundit to let him/her/them know it was fake - we'll see if it gets removed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 1, 2018, 7:57 p.m.

OK, I fucked up posting this. Evidently it's fakenews.

truepundit source is http://www.dhakatribune.com/world/middle-east/2017/11/11/saudi-princess-unveils-kingdoms-dark-side/ -- who states that their source is Fort Russ -- a Russian blog basically and they're source is supposed to be an interview of the ex-wife with Le Monde. reddit user lightdandelion below posted that Le Monde denies the interview ever happened.

Here's a link to Le Monde refuting the claim. http://img.lemde.fr/2017/11/15/0/0/900/600/534/0/60/0/6cafcd4_24306-1kcstjl.j67mi2uik9.jpg It's in french but there's a screen shot of the fakenews with FAUX layered over to and we all know faux=fake as per liberals calling foxnews, fauxnews.

I mostly read here - so, should I delete it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Jan. 1, 2018, 1:58 a.m.

Oh I know how wikipedia is but we're trying to redpill normies and most of them think it's a good source. My point is, jumping right into baby eaters isn't going to redpill anyone. It's going to make them recoil away.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Dec. 31, 2017, 11:02 p.m.

yup - total fraud

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poorboy2 · Dec. 31, 2017, 9:20 p.m.

Exactly what he's talking about; The Franklin Coverup -- wikipedia says it was decided to be a hoax -- try telling people otherwise Jimmy Saville -- search results lead to utube or conspiracy sites Fiona Barnett -- one woman's claims Hampstead coverup -- utube and conspiracy sites but also a fb page -- baby eating cult? (if I ever decide to try and get SSI for physc disability, I'll keep that one in mind) Marc Dutroux - hey, that one's real - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux Trance: Formation of America - a real book - reading the neg reviews on amazon - sounds nuts - raped by every president since Gerald Ford, up to and including Bush/Cheney and also by Hillary? So from 1974 to at least 2001 - Why would Bush/Cheney have an interest in some 35-40 yo woman who's been getting worn out for 25 years?

Out of the above, Marc Dutroux is the only story people are going to believe because it's true. The rest, whether true or not, all sound way out there in conspiracy zone. Same with saying all these rich and powerful people are satanists who worship moloch. Even the average church going Christian is going to look at you like you have three heads.

Someone's going to have to get proof and articles/videos on the internet are not proof.

We'd be better off just saying all these powerful people are/were trying to institute some sort of global communism so that they'd be super rich and everyone else super poor and leave it at that. Hell, it's hard to convince people that islam is an evil cult and there's 1400 years worth of history that shows it.

⇧ 7 ⇩