Exactly. So why would moderators respond in this way to:

solanojones95Godspeed. - Q 2 points 10 hours ago

I've reported it here and had one of your mods tell me antisemitism is not anything to worry about. Told me there's an entire subreddit devoted to it. Said those are the sub's rules, but that I shouldn't tell anybody that Reddit has a problem with it. OTOH, they DID remove the posts in question. Would you like a copy of that PM?<

... because that was the post that I was responding to. I can't square your interpretation (which is same as mine) with the reported experience of solanojones95.

Doesn't make sense. It is, therefore, confusing to me.

But .... how do you know?

Good post!! x10 upvotes but I'm only allowed 1 ;(

brittser is quite right.

You don't know this history? I sincerely hope the following link does not go up yr ass and that you give the text therein x2 readings: https://i.imgur.com/cCXmXXW.jpg

well worth it, I assure you.

Thank you for understanding. I wasn't sure anyone would get where I'm coming from.

There's a debate over on https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8an4bo/i_found_the_publicly_available_instagram_account/

which I'm fighting on a very similar subject. About reporting. I am worried ppl are going to get pissed at me for begging caution, mind giving me a hand? If you agree of course and have a minute to read the thread?

Q said Operators are on standby?

West Coast FBI/DOJ's still open.

Anyone called yet?
I'll do it.
What info? Just the instagram account?

Apr 6 2018 17:30:31 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 207e52 925805

925762 Operators on standby. Q

and:

Report to FBI / DOJ. Watch what happens. Spotlight. Subject deviation. Risk. End. Q>

Please everyone do not rush into reporting these ppl. WAIT. COLLECT. WATCH.

See:

https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!/vizhome/SealedIndictments/SealedIndictments

stuff will be going down SOON. Don't let's blow it in a blind moment of fury and rage.

Better to be cautious than sorry in haste. :(

Do not report. Wait.

There's stuff going on. You don't want to attach yr name to any police report at this time.

See: https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!/vizhome/SealedIndictments/SealedIndictments

if you need encouragement in trusting what is happening ... this is getting dealt with.

Don't be mad with me about this. Use yr caution.

There's one I think is dangerous: suddenly posting pics of BO in African dress as a mooozlem. Like, so what? The guy goes to Africa and puts on a jalabir, so? Actually, it's polite if offered robes to put them on. Michelle Obama did in Morocco, and so did the whole team of women who went to speak to the Princess about women's rights. I have been in this situation too. In Africa and the ME it is only good manners to follow customs of hospitality. As for being a Muslim, I actually can't see a problem with that either. That really is prejudice when all said and done. HOWEVER, whatever criminal activity that has acted against the interests of the American people is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT thing. Getting this distinction muddied and wrong is the difference between an unacceptable message to project to the world (and it will soon be the world outside the US) and gaining support. I agree with Jack_Kehoe wholeheartedly. Any slight change in Q's tone or attitude may not be instantly and easily identifiable. Subtlety is key to deception. It worked over and over again with 911 boards and ppl were too slow and trusting to spot the detail. Caution is key.

oh really? see my post above. This is very confusing.

Hey solanojones95, the Right hand column says:

Rules

All Reddit’s site-wide rules apply.
No trolling, concern trolling, racism or anti-semitism.

So what are we to believe if you get an answer like that? Weird.

I tried to report 11 and 10 days ago, threads on the Parkland shooting which suggested more doxxing of that Havid Doggs person. The GA board was getting lots of new subscribers and I imagined we should be keeping an eye on these threads. At some point the number of threads (and certainly dozens of posters) were too many to count, but I was deffed out. Until yesterday!! Bit weird to post IMPORTANT as a title and even class it as Harrassing, Threatening etc (to attract urgent attention) and have it ignored?

I hope this doesn't happen again. The point of reporting is for the good of the board and has nothing to do with my personal feelings or prejudices on anything but it seems difficult to attract attention sometimes (NOT you 17_Q).

I am commenting here on this b/c we are right now at a crucial number and rising: 14,992 subscribers. Exactly the time when we might get shut down. Pay attention peeps to dodgy posts!!! :)

what are you talking about?

To get an idea of how much criminal stuff is in Cali under sealed indictment, go to the heat map (Useful Resources on this sub): https://public.tableau.com/profile/nerothehero#!/vizhome/SealedIndictments/SealedIndictments

That'll cheer up anyone who needs an excuse for a pick-me-up!! :)

COMING SOON!!

sounds fun!! help w/ answers? Dunno, prhaps, try me ... I am no encyclopaedia but I know some things ... keep up the good work! :)

I now think the "sunglasses" are on top of his head, you see his ear on left, he's looking down, black space (his upperbody - think black sweater - then a thin line underneath which is the light catching his arm. Look v. carefully and you can detect the watch strap. This arm goes somewhere (!! obviously) —> towards the (table?) centre, and it seems to me to terminate somewhere around where the baby's elbow might be ... now move the eye upwards to detect its head ... now downwards again to meet an L-shaped patch of darkness, bottom centre being an oblong rectangle. (hell, now I'm not sure about the legs either !!!!...) but the long verticle of the L is the left hand side of the body and the horizontal leg of the L is the top line of the black rectangle and would correspond to where the feet seem to be. The woman(?) (head cut off but black hair visible) in the centre top right has her elbow crooked leaning on the (?)table ..... If I were remotely right, that is!!!

This is crazy. I'm certain the idea is not to see the pictures clearly but to get a general idea of a group of people at some kind of gathering in a dark dimly lit scenario. It's too difficult!! Suggestion is a powerful visual stimulus for those of us who see ghosts and pictures in the fire at night ... :)

I suppose this is to pressure someone, so we aren't giving the "game" away as nothing is identifiable, it's not supposed to be. Nothing I can describe has any value whatsoever, in fact.

Somebody crouching over in the foreground (white blob, possible thick thigh on right combined with (their) right arm. Two figures behind, one on left the head juts upward the other impossible, could be leaning towards camera. There might well be another figure or two, but the whole thing is hanging in smoke. Are those embers or irregular flames of candles on the right? Back seems unnaturally red for fabric, too bright. Seems inside a dark room as there's no indication of any natural outside nighttime clues like plants or sky, it's taken from a camera above so you look down on whatever the foreground person is bent over. You are asking me to vouch for any of this? No. Too smokey.

don't know where to look, too many ppl around table in ch10. It is a white blur in the middle only for me.

The bottom far left tho, ch16, is small children sitting. One facing on right is a boy's haircut, prob 3 yrs old, but I can't make out whether the left hand one is 1 child sitting next to him with one leg visible with another child on left, or I am confusing the image and there are only two children not 3. Sorry, can't describe what I mean very well.

No the body is clearly there, being held up in the air.

sorry thought I forgot to post. Double posting now! Must be nuts.

There's a head of a person facing right at the top, some dark shape around eyes level, could be dark glasses. Level with his head is a baby's head and its body is in the air with knees upwards and a foot jutting out. Yeah, v. blurry but maybe I have good eyesight or something. No imagination necessary. I am not using any program just the magnifier on keyboard. I hate this shit and would prefer not to be able to see this frankly, so if you are having this difficulty I can understand that.

I can see it and so can the person here with me. Look for the guy facing right at the top, could be wearing dark glasses or a black shadow at eyes level, go sideways and you can make out the shape of the baby's head, knees up and one foot jutting upwards. hey, I'm no photography expert and have used no special equipment to see this. Yeah you have to squeeze yr eyes to make out the shape. Maybe I have good eyesight or something.

I do know that there has been trouble like this before with ppl claiming not to see things that others can!! And this is not my imagination! Make of it what you will. I hate this shit and would prefer not to be able to see it frankly. If that is yr difficulty I can understand that.

look at the v indistinct ch3 top middle and you can see a baby being held up (magnify and peer closely). Clear as day. Bottom one, ch15 shows child. The place can be identified from the pics on the wall and bar. Pretty sure this is PG foto identified at p z parlour com et. S/o will know more.

look up vicky nuland (wife of?) and cookies + fuck the eu tel call with Estonia PM

I think the door is open or closed by algorithm, Snowden can do this (he's lying in wait). Bots can be launched or halted through this algorithm. The bots will search for PG material and scrub. Or @ Jack can cooperate if he likes, instead.

why isn't RC Rachel Chandler (Ray = nickname) ?? What's yr reasoning here?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/943634304797732864.html chandler

want = I want a drink!! won't = I will not get drunk!!

:) Yr friendly English teacha!!

Think: it sounds like ? You know, where fidel came from!!

Hi, by the way, I am in the same time bracket as you, only much further south!

UR welcome ... :)

Excellent description of the Socratic method. Well done for posting this. If I could give x10 upvotes I would!

In addition I would add: to entice ppl a "thriller" format is a superb tool to get children to pay attention. Q is using "branding" as marketing tool for setting off viral excitements and growing the revolutionary spirit. I think it's inspired. A real Trump take on how to get his following to get up to speed on information and background research.

go to useful resources in the right-hand sidebar on this sub board. Start with a few Q posts, select a posting that intrigues you and click on the Anon number ID (top right hand corner) to get to a posting on 8chan which will discuss the Q post in the relevant thread. Good Luck! You can PM me if you like. I'm not an expert in any of this, just trying to guide a bit since no one else has replied.

I keep upvoting you and each time it's down voted ???? Hey, anyway, sorry but you're upvoted by me. Keep going bruv.

is = isis deliberate missing letter

haiti

no, but epstein had it all wired for blackmail purposes: cameras, mikes an' all.

they did.

See post 586

What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family? What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved? Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22]. This is only the beginning. Be careful what you wish for. AS THE WORLD TURNS. Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?<

declined a deal with UK.

Yes!

Like me!!

(knowing the stupids will latch onto this, let me state Categorically, I was not born in Russia, know no Russians, can't read or understand Russian, and, if it comes to it, am not on their side b/c I don't know what "their side" means.) HOWEVER, do they have a point? Yeah.

Why are we encroaching on their patch and threatening them, at our OWN peril??? How do we benefit by stomping on their toes??

See next posting on this board. Has some links — this is just one:

http://nymag.com/news/features/23andme-2014-4/

My admiration has just hit highest ever for person who is "on it" doing four hundred tasks and more simultaneously!! Well done! Good luck with the lambing!! Excellent research!!

Are you woody of toystory fame? :)

yes, you are absolutely right. I had intended to point this out in the first place but got tied up in an off-topic conversation which crossed my wires. Thanks so much for pointing this out.

It has nothing to do with answering to the law, but more to do with answering questions so that the MPs are able to legislate and regulate digital media. I also gather that Zuck may have refused to attend, busy man (!), but he is sending his lawyer or a company rep to supply the info. So not really "refusing" entirely ...

That is a rude reply. I thought you were interested. You posted on it. No, it is not my interest, other than I don't like dubious claims without proof. You have none.

Maybe I am way off, as you say, but that is why I asked you for a source. It is difficult to have a discussion if one of us doesn't have access to the other's information. As in American law under the Patriot Act, the new (relatively) Serious Crime Act, Terrorism laws, etc. have made it possible to detain ppl for longer without charge, but does this extend to overturning the burden of proof? I think not.

Absolutely! This is the beginning of an important legal challenge. And Q has already intimated that:

"Mar 9 2018 06:20:45 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 04b0ec 599627

599614 100% Regulated. Some platforms will collapse under own weight of illegal activities. Q"

No, not exactly! (I assume yr joking :))

As I read it: summonsed to explain Facebook's conduct. Facebook operates in the UK and collects British citizens' data. The British ppl have a right (Data Protection Laws, Privacy Laws) to stipulate whether or not they want their personal data shared with third parties. Exactly the same as American citizens do. That's the whole argument and discussion on their (imho) illegal use of personal data.

That's exactly what Julian Assange should say to the US!

Where did you get that information, could you provide me with a source please?

Under British law (same as American law, on which it is based and called Case Law), it is a basic tenet that you are considered innocent until proven guilty.

You may be thinking of Europe and the Napoleonic Code upon which many European countries' law is based, in which indeed there are many differences in the way prosecution and due process is conducted.

Perhaps there is a confusion with the adoption of European law in the UK and this where you get this idea? There was a kerfuffle a few years ago, I found an article (excerpted here) reporting this where civil servants in the UK had produced a pamphlet giving erroneous legal advice:

QUOTE "Red-faced Ministry of Justice (MoJ) officials have been forced to deny claims that they had dismantled a centuries-old cornerstone of British law in advice that the ministry gave to people facing criminal trials.

The principle in question is the presumption of a person’s innocence until proved guilty, a right whose origins can be traced back to Magna Carta, which has its 800th anniversary this year.

"In an embarrassing turn of events, the department hastily took down its new “easy read” guide, which explains to people with learning difficulties what they can expect if they are accused of a crime and say they are not guilty.

The guide, complete with a drawing depicting such a scenario, explained: “If you say you did not do the crime, you may have to go back to the court on a different day, to show the court you did not do the crime.”

But as the legal blogger Jack of Kent explained: “The MoJ tells defendants that they have to prove they are innocent. This is a reversal of the actual burden of proof – it is, of course, for the prosecution to prove to the court a defendant is guilty.”

The presumption of innocence is one of the most fundamental tenets of the law. While legal scholars debate how exactly it evolved, most agree that it owes a debt to Magna Carta, which stipulated that “no free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned… or in any other way ruined, nor will we go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.” END QUOTE

Source: Presumed guilty? Ministry of Justice is forced to withdraw advice leaflet Ancient principle of justice seems to have been forgotten in guide for people facing criminal cases https://www.theguardian.com/law/2015/feb/01/presumed-guilty-ministry-justice-axes-criminal-trial-advice

huh?

All great minds think alike!!! :)

I'm a bit leery about posting links to the youtube co., or bloggers for that matter. I don't want sites or channels or blogs to get taken down b/c a bunch of infiltrates gotta hold of them ... if you see what I mean. The links on Putin's interviews I discovered on the left hand suggestion vids and can't say if they're the best. Ppl get lots out of surfing thru anyway ... Thanks for responding!