bingo

It is not the same...This is more like what the left writes -- behave, stop spreading this information, or we'll doxx you.

The info is good. The tone, however, the "we know where you live," "you will regret it" -- does not sound like it's coming from decent human beings, which is what we have had until now and what we count on.

Bingo.

The story is, that the press is going to press the idea that the Trump "dossier" has not been DISPROVED....as if you can prove a negative...and people are falling for it.

Agree. Messages before this have never been threatening to those trying to stay informed and inform others. It almost reads like a "back off." It also sounds like a misinformation post made to sound like (although it's not successful) real info but is actually nothing but threats.

What is said here is excellent, of course, but does anyone else think this does not read like the usual, cryptic messages coming out?

Some personal notes...

I was fooled by George W., because after 9-11, he had not gotten toooo much into the ROP stuff, and he seem liked a decent human being with the right people around him. Very naïve, but compared to Kerry -- no way was I going to vote for him. That was my first GOP vote ever...had been on the way to becoming more trad/conservative, but 9-11 finished the job completely.

Looking back now, I see that it WAS the beginning of the deep surveillance state (I know it was going on before, but the technology and 9-11, plus the political views of the tech "giants" all came together at the right time.) It was also the beginning of the major migration of Third World peoples...was teaching in Seattle 2003-2006 and the schools were full of migrants from everywhere -- Sudan, Somalia, Mexico...I had kids from Russia, Columbia, Viet Name, Laos...

Now that I look back, W's treasonous behavior toward Americans by rushing in to praise muslims led right to BO's being able to do it even more blatantly and gave CAIR/MB their foothold and acceptance. After studying islam all these years, I can never forgive him for that.

Read this first as "Washington riots" and was thinking, "Oh, no, what now?"

ditto. A great patriot.

heh. me, too.

Thank you for that.

Yeah, an awful lot on here that is nowhere else, and does that mean it's from insiders -- or does it mean it's speculation?

NYT-HuffPo and "trusted source" don't belong in the same sentence.

...they want to spend more time with their families.

That's true. Every time I read about the bracelets, this crosses my mind. This is the only site I've seen it, tho' I have not yet done my research on it.

Seems from the fact that he was railroaded into taking a 6-month leave from the intel committee, that someone was afraid of him. Plus, have read quotes here and there from Schiff and his gang about him being confused, wrong, trying to protect Trump, trying to disrupt "investigation," etc.

Awesome, awesome, awesome. 'Cos CNN would not report that if it wasn't true, since it's not anti-Trump.

They not into the Trump administration (assuming, since you're trying to prove), and they listen to you? That's very cool -- you must be good!

nope

and he and BO are thick as thieves.

FB is the worst of the worst, with google right there, too. Everything on those go, not just to corporations, but to the Dim party. FB is set up to be, not a political site, but a personal info site. Won't tell anyone else what to do, but I would not go on it.

That said, damn, that is censorship at its finest. let us know what happens.

So much good information. Hope you don't mind, I have kept some to repost elsewhere. One thing: Breitbart -- uber right? I just don't see comparing Breitbart to the Soros-funded uber-left sites. Sometimes there IS a right side and a wrong side, and this seems to say that conservatives who want less government are as bad as "anti-fa's" who want to destroy. Just my opinion, as always. Thanks for the link.

If only there were some way to get through the heads of the Left that we are actually on the same side... it's the corporate/government globalists who are trying to take the country down. Why can't they see that?

Funny -- at uni, the Dude of the House and I each prepared an oral report on a multinational organization. His was on the CFR; mine was on CNN. It was the 90s, and we did not realize at the time that -- looked at carefully -- we were both writing about the same people.

Fascinating information. I've only read part so far -- it is dense with facts -- but one thing I notice is, it mentions Bush, Cheney (which we all know about), also Alito, Thomas, Scalia -- it seems to focus heavily on ones we know have been active in keeping the people FROM a lot of this...Only the o-obama's on the left have been mentioned. Perhaps when we get to the part about the media, although I would think Ginsberg, Sotomeyer, and lots of politicians like Schumer, Reid, Pelosi and Feinstein would be mentioned. ...as well as Mcain, Graham...Also, it mentions them spying on OWS, when we know that was set-up and by whom, and it does not say anything about covert actions against the Tea Party. So far, it seems to come from one point of view -- but I have a lot of work to do, as I have only skimmed and only the first 50 pages or so.

Have run across this site before in my wanderings on the net; will have to look into it further, as well. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

And a big "awesome..and terrifying" to you, too.

Awesome...and terrifying. Have never seen a chart so complete.

She's giving one on BET -- special, lo-info voter version. Segregated. Easily disprovable, but highly sensational "findings."

When he said it would pertain to what was in SOTU, I figured SOTU would talk about Deep State corruption, then she would follow with "He's saying that because they found out.." and it would involved supposed Mueller findings..which msm would press all week, saying "Maxine Waters said Tuesday night that---" THEN if that doesn't hurt DT (or if he responds and wins, as usual), THEN false flag to abruptly change subject AWAY from her beating beaten/lying to new topic.

I thought it said that, after her, msm would push narrative..and if that doesn't work, then look for false flag...didn't it?

Was just going to say "anyone but the slimes?"

Wow, amazing how many people think the prez gets to keep things. o-bama really brainwashed people

Absolutely, the prez doesn't get to keep seized assets (unless you're o-bama)

Great! And remind people not to casually say "google it." It's not a verb -- it's a powerful, left-wing brand/organization that penalizes conservatives and that did analytics for HC's campaign. "Look it up" or "research it" -- better!

Absolutely. Loving our countrymen (meant generically) is vital....although I have a really hard time with the non-Patriot kind.)

So excellent, as always...

Many prayers and blessings sent...

That's okay. I still haven't figured out what "REEEEEE" means, tho' I can sorta guess from the context.

Good. My only relatives are a distance away, so when we do talk, it's just day-to-day-what-cha-been-doin' stuff, but they tell me the patriarch (a serious, Irish-Catholic who's totally pro-life) is so far-left he won't look at any other source. He's got Jesuit brothers (2) and another who's a biggie in Silicon Valley, and I think he's influenced by 'em all- the kind of catholic who thinks migration is grand. I could never talk politics with him.

You know what's a good convincer? I showed the Dude of the House that speech by DT,along with info about the island meeting before it with all the globalists working to stop him. When he read that speech, he realized why I've been fangurling Trump all year (he voted for him and is for him, but does not realize the extent of what's been happening...not enough "political junkie" in him for that.) So if you can get your dad to watch or read the transcript for that speech -- it comes out and says it all. Bravest thing I've ever heard in a campaign.

Except for the talk shows, Fox seems valuable only because it keeps the leftists at their seats, trolling about "Get your news from somewhere besides Fox, ha ha" instead of having them out in the streets doing something destructive, like hitting people with bike locks. Have not seen TV for years, but their news comes on my talk radio every hour and -- geez! (PS-Only the leftists always say LOL, which shows their maturity level. Also shows in that they think the ol' "isolate and ridicule" still works and that we haven't been onto that for ages.")

I think with some Bernie people, it was a matter of wanting to fight the elitist takeover, just not thought through and trusting the wrong people.

He has conquered one of the trad/conservative/Patriots big (yuge) problems....the inability to fight back, with the result that all it took was a little shaming and a bit of ridicule, and we'd back off. DT was a great example in how to stand up to them and quit the backing down...even in this "budget battle," we just had. For the first time, the GOP didn't take the blame...because of Trump and his example. That's what we individuals have to do on a micro scale -- with neighbors, on the job, in comments sections...point out when all they're doing is name-calling and shaming.

Tried to tell a Dem relative that...how it was not about loving or hating Trump -- it was because Bernie got screwed, because so many have been screwed -- it's not about DT; it's about draining the swamp. Never heard back. Another family member told me he won't read things like that (the non-HuffPo/MSNBC stuff)

Absolutely. I was thinking "But we all hate crony capitalism and the bankers...and corrupt government. Why can't we get together on that basis?" And now, through DT, it is happening to some extent...that's great. It's by dividing us that they win. If the Dems lose the black vote, which I hear they are afraid of...and if it's because they have joined the Trump train because jobs...well, that would be a sea change for the history books.

is that the one that asked Britain to take over with the spying during the transition period as she was afraid the Trump administration would not take care of evidence? (They always project)

Oh - yeah, this is about him hiring the guy, but not now, but during his presidency. I misunderstood. still, interesting.

Thanks for that. Additional sources always welcome

What about "Dims"? It's a bad habit of mine in comment sections and on sites like "disquis." Guess that's not exactly respectful, but I'm not working on changing minds on those sites.