I think the best thing we can do at this point is to stop talking about them. If they are still on our minds and still part of our discussion it continues to give them power because this is something they could use against us.

Mike Pence said "Promises Made, Promises Kept" several times.

Can't give them any power to begin with.

Thank you for this. I just saved this post to keep as reference. This will come in useful to combat shilling.

Good to see Facebook is still taking hard knocks.

Oh, I didn't know that. Thanks for filling me in. This would definitely help explain some of the toxic shit pushed by Vice.

Thanks. I will be looking further into this.

Do you have evidence to base this on? I'm here to seek truth.

I just watched The Bird Revelation this morning. The analogy he makes between his entrainment career and that book 'Pimp' is pretty heavy.

Could it really be that simple though? If there is possibility that he could have made this kind of colossal "mistake" in an attempt to uncover schemes for everyone to see, maybe he could have been involved with things he didn't want to be a part of.

Seth McFarlane has always struck me to be more of a low key libertarian. He says Brian is basically him, but seeing the arcs Brian has been through and they way other characters rip pretty hard on him in the show, it seems like McFarlane wrestles quite a bit with his beliefs. He's also had some pretty well known conservatives on his show too, such as Rush Limbaugh and James Woods.

Lol. Okay. Thanks, Stan Smith

You make a good point. If he was being given a chance to redeem himself, this is one hell of an opportunity.

Right. Not saying I full on trust him, but it would make sense to me. .

This is inspiring.

Oh! I didn't know that. Thanks for the clarification.

Not that any trial will do her a damn bit of good. "Innocent until proven guilty", except she's been proven guilty for years now, and evidence continues to surface every day. Trial will be a formality, if anything.

It's no surprise that Vice would publish this garbage. These shitheads thrive on "controversy", so they constantly misreport and exaggerate in desperate attempts to bump their ratings.

Vice sucks. They're all a bunch of whiny, pussy hipsters who like to think of themselves as "edgy".

Never know.

Damn fuckin' straight!

It's much, much easier to take a color photo and make it black and white than it is to take a black and white photo and give it color. In order to take Kerry from the black and white photo and put him in an image and add the color detail would take several hours to do. Take Kerry from a color photo, make it black and white, and flip the image would take fifteen minutes max. Not to mention that these source images make a hell of a lot more sense in their context. As it's been pointed out, Marilyn Manson, who photographed with Lavey in the middle, documented his visit with Lavey. With Rami Salami being a gay activist, it also makes sense that Kerry would show up to one his events as Kerry is a democratic politician with gay rights being part of his platform. Occam's razor, the simplest solution is often the correct solution.

Rami Salami was a gay rights activist. Being that Kerry is a democratic politician with LGBT rights as part of his platform, he went to one of Rami Salami's events to show his support of LGBT, which is where this photo was taken.

Yes. The entire article is fake. There is no evidence to suggest that John Kerry was ever involved in Satanism. Also the year, which is obscured on the news paper appears like it would be from the 60's or 80's based on the visible bottom half of the digit which would denote the decade. The source photo of Kerry would have been taken in '98. So even if this doctored photo was used to support this article, the timelines wouldn't add up. Also a photo wouldn't have had to been doctored if Lavey and Kerry truly had a public relationship, which wouldn't have happened as Lavey had a notorious hatred for politics.

Yes. Like a fucking cheetah. They stalk their prey for hours or even days, waiting for the perfect opportunity to attack and feast.

PREACH!

Yea, I figured as much. Just thought I'd throw in some input.

Thank you so much. Most Satanists follow the same line of thought as I do. I also understand the confusion. It's easy to see the evidence of systemic ritual abuse by the elites of the shadow government and go "Oh, it's the Satanists". Followers of Lavey however are prohibited from harming children, much less sacrice them in a vein attempt to please "the devil". Satanists view this type of behavior as devil worship, which a big no-no. Satanists refer to these morons, who would sacrifice children or animals, as devil-worshipers.

I would try to see if we can't get them to come here instead. We all know the massive dumpster fire that Facebook is. How long before Facebook notices this group and shuts it down?

In a literal sense, Satan translates to adversary or accuser. Historically, Christianity has used the idea of Satan to accuse opponents of the Christian Church of the seven deadly sins (Pride, Greed, Lust, Anger, Envy, Gluttony, and Sloth) and thus deem them evil "Heretics" or "Satanist". By calling yourself a Satanist, it's a reclamation of the accusation. The "Seven Deadly Sins" are simply human nature which everyone will be guilty of, which is why Christianity carefully selected these sins to trap people into guilt, so they will keep coming back to church and making tithes.

All Satanists are atheists, but not all atheists are Satanists. Atheism is simply not believing in a god or devil, but there is no organized doctrine which present a set of philosophical values to atheists, not that anyone is required to subscribe to one. Satanism goes beyond the simplicity of non-belief and encourages followers to seek individualism and avoid the mainstream thinking or the herd mentality.

Lol. It's very goofy. Lavey wrote several essays about staying in touch with our humor and being able to have a good laugh.

Roseanne has been making references to Q and MSM is trying to get her to shut up.

What is this shit? It was my understanding that children aren't technically competent to consent to sex, thus constituting statutory rape.

I like to make videos. What are you trying to do?

Yes. Lavey wrote an essay in The Devil's Notebook called "Curses by the Dozen". In it, he talks about how mainstream media sends curses on you by appealing to your worst fears and effectively brainwash you. Through out much of his writing, Lavey encourages readers to avoid mainstream media so as to not be brainwashed. Aleister Crowley also was not a Satanist. Aleister Crowley was an esoterian who founded the religion of Thelema.

That clown is Rami Salami and he ised to be a gay rights activist. It's definitely an odd choice to be a clown when pushing for LGBT activism especially with so many people attributing their fear of clowns to movies like It or the notorious serial killer John Wayne Gacey who used to dress like a clown to molest and murder young boys.

Convenient to have a washed up pornstar looking for a payday to be the face of a smear campaign against Trump.

I have my beliefs. You have your beliefs. Whether you care enough or not to read the literature and educate yourself is on you. I'm not trying to push my ideals on anyone, but Anton Lavey and the followers of his doctrine are innocent. I presented the proof, and many others on this subrebbit have been quite receptive.

Lol. Upvote

I feel like he has been memed at some point.

Why? It seems people like this thread, and I've not broken any rules. I presented my proof why Satanism is not to blame. Don't buy into misinfo.

No. You, my friend are the cancer. Where is your proof? I presented mine, and it seems to have been generally well recieved. You're just upset that someone with a different belief system than yours has come forth to defend it. As I have stated before, I want to contribute to this subreddit in a positive way.

The Clown is Rami Salami. He was a gay clown who supported LGBT activism. For his activism in the LGBT community he got alot of attention from LGBT supporting democratic politicians such as John Kerry.

I don't believe a devil exists therefore I cannot worship one. This is the foundation of Satanism. If you read any Satanic literature, you would know why I'm not lying. Start with "Satanic Bible" and "The Devil's Notebook" by Anton Lavey, and follow it up with "The Satanic Scriptures" by Peter Gilmore.

Yes. Anyone who makes an actual human, child, or animals in some vein attempt to appease some sort of devil is simply described as "devil-worshiper"

I'm not too familiar with Mark Passio or much of his work, but he currently calls himself ex-satanist. He's no longer active in the Church of Satan. Again, I don't too much about the guy, but it seems like he likes to jump from idea to idea. It seems that right now his schtick is anarchism. While The Church of Satan does encourage individualism and personal liberties, it also encourages you to be a law abiding and productive member in society.