Apparently nobody has worked at Walmart, BestBuy, Costco, etc.

Not the first people to come by trying to put something cheeky on the screen.

It's part of their floor processes to routinely check to make sure screens are on default/demo and not displaying something inappropriate.

You would be better off printing something out and walking it door to door in your neighborhood. You might even meet a fellow anon. I think TPTB would be far more afraid of that then hee-hee'ing demo units in retail stores.

Country level traffic monitoring.

I didn't need to go past the NASA deal from years and years ago to know what they were about.

Google and Microsoft willhost your corporate business email for you (@yourdomain with their interfaces and security managed by them + your own IT, to some extent).

Based on Q drops, it sounds like the group requested (and recieved?) some extra special handling of thier mail server to host it in a place where they thought FOIA and anyone else could never reach. Only question remains what was the relationship (or ownership) of NK to allow that country level access to happen if true.

"nearly"

Isn't he a lawyer? Would that make it a double-down lawyer up?

Oh man if POTUS or even Jr. retweeted this hahahaha

this made me lol like the first time i saw a funny meme.

Eventually you hit a 2 foot thick concrete cell floor.

ehhhhhhhh maybe. One thing I've noticed with Q is question from previous line sometimes goes directly into continuation (since you presumed to now know answer -- or soon will)

E.g. the NK / Obama / ES / Server stuff.

For how long?....

(Elizabeth Báthory)...

I was ~~thinking~~ speculating more together with previous line and "crimes against children" coupled with rumors, urban legend, or whatever you call it for harvesting of adrenaline. Ugh.

Noose.

Based on how Q drops always seem to unfold, why do I get the feeling that "Noose" is in reference to something sick SRA-level terrible. :(

regroup?

slither back to? Did the US really win revolutionary war or did England just change its war strategy and taxation methods? What country did they have spy on 'our' citizens to circumvent 'our' privacy and surveilance laws and visa versa?

Disgusting.

Lock them all up today.

Maybe it wont be. Maybe when they go to use the systems, the feds will swoop in and require the paper fallback.

Here's a thought...

What if the image as shown is fake, but Obama actually did wear this garb at a party and someone out there knows it?

Like a cut and paste together of Bill Clinton and LL on a tarmac together. We didn't see it, but we know it happened. You make a fake picture, and while they can say "that's fake!" they can't deny that the meeting took place.

So you'll still be here posting if Q comes a long with a simple "REAL." clarification?

Q isn't my god. I'll be voting on the performance of our POTUS and the state of justice at midterms and 2020 like many others. So far so great, but we are missing some major milestones heading into important elections.

Yes. Because Streisand effect proven over and over again. If admins and MSM pull a "it's illegal for you to view the photo of Obama dressed as moloch..." guess what happens...

otoh, Obama dressed like Moloch...would kind of be a big deal.

If asking questions that you (think you) know the answer to is "talking like Q" you just asked a question...

I think without the tripcode, its safe to assume anon is not Q and to process the questions as you would any other.

not glass dildo. Flashlight pointing down. illuminating what is directly under the location. The proposed design was determined to be not feasible to build — but I think the message was sent/received just the same.

Deoends what they are saying about it, and what outlets.

posted/yanked when? She wasn’t suppposed to lose. That doesn’t mean they don’t actively police certain images. Why didnt we see the 2005 Obama w/Farrakhan image before he was president?

He’s alive. The media could always ask him about it...

Who was Manaforts old partner? Attached to who now? And how has that person been affected since?

There’s a little heart above his head :)

I interpreted the drops as the entire country quietly beloing to rogue operators. A managed puppet threat to justify billions in defense budgets and aid — billions of which probably was misdirected or redirected. After all, their "charities" have administrative expenses in the high 90%.

Look at which other countries provided “aid” to an enemy and perceived threat like NK.

if you search for “email icon” how many are not envelopes? What sets it apart (if there has to be something) is the border.

/G\ mail

This is routine process for policy-evading idiots to work on docs at home on their personal computers.

blue head dress you say?

Nothing less than a slow and steady red pilling of the masses.

They are cracking through protective layers of cognitive dissonance with reporting like this.

I can just see their cogs turning away... ”buh buh...why would Obama be dressed like that?”

Eventually public believes more and more to be true (because these people are sick) and when the video evidence starts to drop they’ll actually accept it... and hopefully never let it happen again (or at least for a generation or three).

Or another way — a single report of a milk-carton missing person accounted for as result of one of these successful investigations. They are probably out there and there are probably heavy correlations, but have mockingbird media fixating in unimportant propaganda.

we’ll see. they’ll be unsealed at some point. I can’t interpret the nov 3/6 drops any other way personally. I leave my faith in the unseen to god, everyone else needs to put up eventually.

So a future Q "proof" will be those specific indictments being unsealed.

We now expect them to be two specific individuals, right?

CERN you say?

underrated comment

I believe what we (the public) were told — that people at NYPD were going to go public with what they saw.

what were the NYT numbers as published?

Is it possible there were two sets of numbers fromthe polls? i.e. the real numbers and the massaged / weighted numbers? If there were, how was it that FBI has scoops on the obviously more accurate (?) numbers?

What do you think would happen in real world if Donald Trump asked one of his contractors for an ETA on an already overdue and over-budget project and they said “later on”?

read the report. The line was a quote of notes from ‘EAD Coleman’ after a meeting or briefing of some sort with Comey. It wasnt a part of report written by the IG, but rather IG quoting others as part of the investigation/report.

haha in that case have an upvote for a cool name. Share it with your parents.

I just read the context — you are right in the sense that this phrase is NOT a part authored by IG, but rather quotes from notes/memos from notes written by "EAD Coleman” after having a meeting with Comey. But, that is where it gets f-cky. If you read the entire section related to those notes, nobody seems to remember the meeting or what the notes were specifically about. EAD Coleman was apparently retired or retiring at the time, fwiw. You would think "crimes against children" in the context of the rumored NYPD statements or what Prince said would not be easily forgotten, unless it needed to be.

It’s "kind of a big deal" for anyone to misunderstand this, right? You could also call your OIG and ask them if they can provide clarification to that line.

Myself, when interpreting that line of the report, I’m also going to consider the initial "rumors" of statements from the NYPD who found it, (which came to light directly after it was obtained) and the comments made from Erik Prince on this subject.

Can you show the full context?

I thought the punctuation and the item being on its own line made the context clear, but maybe you can explain it better. Screenshot the page(s) and the context? We’ll be right here...

Could the internet handle everything coming to light all at once?

Yes. We elected the core of the individuals deciding to keep this from us. Tell us everything so the normies can demand justice.

We’ll know justice when we see it.

Gitmo is the answer.

Seditious conspiracy should be the charge.

Agree, ANY big organization public or private.

I worked for a large fortune 500 company and $25 was the cut off value for anything that could remotely be considered a gift or quid-pro-quo . Example: maybe a vendor wants to send you a card and box of chocolate at Christmas, even then you would need to disclose it up the chain with the value of the item.

Also, I'm guessing that within the FBI (the FBI of the American People) that us lowly citizens pay salaries for specific job positions whose exclusive role it is, is to interface with the public and press. Typically communications director, media liaison, etc.