Anonymous ID: 2IvaiC0z Oct. 29, 2017, 4:59 p.m. No.147155536   🗄️plebs   >>6117

>>147146601

How's that based, or even positive?

He's saying Mueller tries to deflect from the real collusion (Clintons). Yeah, still shit for us. And tick tock? Yeah, the time of these "indictments" (if the "sources" weren't full of shit and simply fooled CNN/Buzzfeed) draws nearer, so what?

I don't know what to make of these tweets, they are rather meaningless and don't even hint at anything (apart from the reports about indictments being correct).

Anonymous ID: 2IvaiC0z Oct. 29, 2017, 7:40 p.m. No.147171503   🗄️plebs   >>3053

>>147151330

Well, he's right insofar as the narrative will be exactly like he said. Of course Fox will counter this (at least some people like Tucker or Hannity), but all other media will pretend this to be proof that "Trump's campaign" was directed by the Russians and he is an illegitimate president.

You can go about Fusion and perjury all you want, if Mueller doesn't indict, nothing will happen. Remember Hillary. If nobody fucking does anything, nothing will happen. It will just be another entry in the long list of Clinton-related crimes that went unpunished.