Why I'm skeptical of QCAnon's purported "leaks"

Occam's razor: the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one.

The person or people behind the posts by "Q" fall into one of three categories:

One person, small group of people (cell), large group of people (govt agency).

If one person alone is in fact Q, then it's not likely he is anyone with a security clearance. Why do I say this? In 2011, 854,000 held top secret clearances. U.S. population was 310 million at that time. Being generous with these figures only between a quarter and a third of one percent (0.3%) of the population holds a top secret clearance, and even less (far less) would have access to the kind of info that Q purports in his posts.

So presuming then Q is just some random person, then would he take the time to post as he/she has? Well ask yourself why most people do the shit they do online, especially the stuff that is deliberately done to grab attention. What do you think?

If he/she is a small group of people, then again it's not likely they are privy to classified info. Perhaps they are pranksters, subcontractors to intelligence agencies, doing it for the lulz or who knows.

If Q is in fact posted by a government or political agency, which is totally inside the realm of possibility given what is known about orgs like JTRIG, russian troll farms and their state owned propaganda programs, the history of programs like cointelpro, etc, then we must ask what their motives are:

Possible motives include shock testing and analysis of the social network flow around PG (which we know is real and which is threatening to many entrenched power players in the US and globally), identifying potential troublemakers and putting them on a list for later follow-up; could be a deep state or other political org trying to wag the Pizzagater's dog and rile up support for the same kind of administration the Republicans have always been about for decades... etc. etc. etc.

1/5

QCAnon implies a war inside the intel agencies such as that the NSA are the good guys fighting the CIA etc.. but do the facts agree with this? NSA has little or no civilian oversight.. they routinely spy on people both domestically and abroad including spying on americans, collecting all internet traffic over US backbones, that they are a part of the cabal that wants to "collect it all", and whose secrecy makes them part of the de facto deep state: why should we trust them? Because some anon says we should? What do you think?

Q also implies that somehow the Military (e.g. what Q refers to as Military Intelligence) is somehow not a part of the deep state, or is somehow contrary to the "evil bad actors". What? At last check, the pentagon has had more than 6.5 TRILLION DOLLARS of unacountable expenditures and counting. They command black ops around the world, are the world's largest polluters by and large, exercise "unconventional warfare" (e.g. destabilizing governments and instigating coups against democratically elected regimes around the world), and are a part of the huge money that there is to be made in war both at home and abroad etc etc. and we're to believe that they are doing this for the good of all?

2/5

Another reason why I'm not buying:

This leaked cable, (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-07/leaked-secret-israeli-cable-confirms-israeli-saudi-coordination-lebanon), was released showing Israel and Saudi Arabia trying to ramp up pressure for war against Iran.. people in trumps cabinet have/are infamous Iran and NK war hawks. Trying to paint a picture of the same narrative thats been going on. It's interesting that prima facie Q is trying to drum up support for a war against these two countries. AND WHO WOULD BENEFIT? THE MILITARY, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, DEFENSE CONTRACTORS, CORPORATIONS, THE MEDIA, AND POLITICIANS WITH TIES TO ALL OF THE ABOVE!

Edit: I found this link, (http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/11/urges-action-saudi-blames-iran-missile-171108044458611.html), less than twelve hours after I wrote this.

3/5

Now how does DRUMPF himself fit in?

We're being told by Q and expected to believe the narrative that was created for Trump since he ran for office: that Trump is an outsider, that he's going to drain the swamp. Consider the following:

Look at Bush 2000: under him we saw tons of corruption in the banking and financial sector.. dirty energy skyrocketed.. police power skyrocketed.. powers of intelligence agencies to spy on us skyrocketed.. how many wars did we get involved in?.. powers and priveleges granted to corporations (e.g. corporation are people) increased greatly.. transfer of wealth from the bottom to the very top (increased inequality of wealth) increased greatly.

Now, the very same people who were advising Bush (and Clinton, and Obama for that matter, etc etc) are advising Drumpf. Further, one could factually say that Drumpf invited them into his administration. This has been demonstrated and really cannot be disputed at this point.

In his first two months in office, Donald Drumpf's administration indicated:

•more cops

•more prisons

•more oil and gas profits

•more corporate ability to influence elections

•more racial profiling

•less clean air

•less clean water

•less clean land

•less protections against corporations

He has tacitly approved:

•more lawfare against protest

•less access to reproductive health for women

And those are just the most documented points. This is not to mention net neutrality, his press secretary invoking states rights for one thing but not another, DeVos and charter schools and standards for education going even further down, his budget being straight out of the Republican playbook.. etc etc.

In short, all this indicates to me that Drumpf, like Obama, while being hailed as a heroic outsider messiah figure, is nothing but a puppet. But if that's true then who is pulling his strings? Well again, what is the most likely explanation? Hmm? Speak up! What do you think?

4/5

In closing, while Q, who purports to be an insider working for a would-be messiah figure is telling/asking you to "have faith", I take exception. I put faith in my own cultivated reason.

I have one (additional) question to ask: Even if what Q is saying as far as that all these people who are horrible evil perpetrators are going to get their comeuppance is true... WHAT IS THE POINT OF TRADING ONE DICTATORSHIP FOR ANOTHER? When Q says, "we want transparency, but not at a cost we can't recover from,"...WELL, BINGO. ASK YOURSELF WHO "WE" REFERS TO. AND IF YOU'RE NOT PART OF THE HIERARCHY WITH THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE SEEKING POWER AT THE TOP DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT WILL INCLUDE YOU?

When he says that "organizations or people who wish to do us harm during this time will be met with swift fury" and "resistance will be dealt with swiftly"... is this not something that a dictator or egomaniac would say? If you look at history and people who talk this way, does this really make you feel safe?

When he says, "when Trump was elected you can't possibly imagine the steps taken prior to losing power to ensure future safety and control"... I say back: Don't put us on your level. Or are you just afraid that revealing more would be a cost you cannot recover from?

When he says, "nothing is random everything has meaning" ... In some spheres this is can be called a (mental) illness. A key tactic of information warfare is to get inside the targets OODA structure where they can't tell what's real and are basically stuck inside a prison of their own imagination and not sure how to act.

Please understand that I'm not saying Q leaks are false. I'm saying that we don't know. And I'm saying that it seems more likely that Q is not who he claims, and given the extraordinary purport of the claims he makes, we must use every last ounce of critical thinking to sort out what's true and protect our minds.

TL;DR: Stay calm. Protect your mind. And if you're an evil bastard- repent.

5/5