>>148854057
Had a read through of your post >>148847068
Interesting stuff.
So you state "4,10,20" (ref. #1 >>147567928) happen to be the first three values or so of the tetrahedral number sequence, fine.
Then you say the "+++" (ref. #94 >>148289594) is a reference to a sign convention used in sub atomic physics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sign_convention
>In relativity, the metric signature [of a metric tensor] can be either (+,-,-,-) or (-,+,+,+).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_tensor
>In the mathematical field of differential geometry, a metric tensor is a type of function
You've then linked the two together in a way that is unclear, to connect to the planned Keystone XL oil pipeline running from Canada to Nebraska, noting that Beaverlodge Operation/Eldorado Mine is located in Canada, and that the NURE program done a survey of it in 1977, concluding it must all be about uranium.
To finish off you point to the recently discovered chamber of the Great Pyramid, suggesting that this was where the ancient Egyptians utilised nuclear science, and link to a graphic of the supposed 'Base S4' of Area 51, where matter transference experiments were done on "Alice's floor"
However if we actually look at the things Q has posted - all with a general theme of deep state corruption - they seemingly give the key to "4,10,20" here #1 >>147588421 - it's a simple A1Z26 cypher.
As for "+++", we see Q uses it in a slightly different way here #126 >>148455482 as "+++ ++ +". The correspondence to sub-atomic metric signatures seems far less marked in this instance.
Overall I'd say your theory doesn't really hold up to scrutiny.