Anonynous ID: 7frIGNDT Nov. 12, 2017, 2:52 p.m. No.149161959   🗄️plebs

The answer to all of this may have been posted on Free Republic today

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3603740/posts?page=106#106

Anonymous ID: 7frIGNDT Nov. 12, 2017, 3:08 p.m. No.149163732   🗄️plebs

The rest of the post:

 

That is how I came up with my hypothesis that the Clinton’s have been selling State Secrets to countries and players outside of our shared-intelligence community.

 

Think about it from the perspective of the Clinton’s in the year 2000. HRC said they were “dead broke” (with ~$12 mm in net worth) and she was the new junior Senator from NY. She had very few legal options to make a lot of money other than writing books, which she did. However, Bill could take an unlimited amount of money for speeches and made over 500 speeches and booked over $200 mm in fees. How did they generate the demand for these speeches?

 

I think they decided to sell state secrets to wealthy despots and dictators in countries that we spied on. They provided information of great value, and the quid pro quo was either a donation to the CF and/or hiring Bill or later HRC to give a speech for an outlandish fee. I think this is why Huma Abedin stripped the classification markings off of the State Department documents before emailing them. The 33,000 missing emails probably contain the connections that tie all of this together.

 

If this scenario is run though the FBI Anon 4Chan dialog and the Q Anon rhetorical questions, it all fits.

 

What is the running total of sealed indictments between Oct 30 and Nov 10 so far found in PACER? (70 more districts left to search…)

842.

This is three times the number in all of 2006 in the entire USA.

https://twitter.com/damartin32

 

Take this theory and go back to the FBI Anon dialog and the Q Anon posts and see it all line up.