Anonymous ID: 285yCQOq Nov. 21, 2017, 4:46 p.m. No.150396566   🗄️plebs   >>8358 >>9408

>>150395774

Stringer post. >>149490950

Post just before stringer. >>149467690

>If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?

>Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?

>Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they’ had a plan to conduct ‘another’ mass extinction event.

 

Rothschild was not to be taken alive.

Something else brewing, Rothschild would have known details.

Someone countered and hit Rothschild.

 

>Green was white hat extracting Rothschild when they were hit by the plane

Anonymous ID: 285yCQOq Nov. 21, 2017, 5:03 p.m. No.150398403   🗄️plebs   >>8527 >>8540 >>8637 >>9774

>>150397723

Good info. If there was an airspace closure why would Green be doing a training flight with an 18 year old student?

 

Basic sequence:

>ATC closed for 30 minutes

>Mike Green on standby for extract

>Operators enter Rothschild estate

>Operators take out security

>Lord de Rothschild in custody

>Green lands to extract

>Plane intercepts on suicide mission

 

Lord de Rothschild was not to be taken alive. Soros counter?

Anonymous ID: 285yCQOq Nov. 21, 2017, 5:16 p.m. No.150399916   🗄️plebs   >>0734 >>0800

>>150399219

>>150398791

Q is telling us to look at the order he is posting in. When he posts an op stringer the posts just before matter.

Also need to expand our view to other things going on in the world.

>Missing Argentinian sub.

>Nuclear radiation over Europe.

>Domino effect on US politicians.

We need to review current events on the timeline of Q's posts.

Or maybe he overestimated us.