>>150394004

If you assume the news reports are right about the plane diving into the chopper -- stands to reason, since the plane is much faster -- Green can't really be the one who made the crash happen. So does that mean he was one of /ourguys/, trying to extract someone or spy on someone, and the R's countered with the plane?

It's kinda hard to do much with a clue like "who countered," when we don't know what was happening to be countered or from which side. I think I'm gonna have to spend some time just reading back through the graphic in order.

>>150395774

Q suggtests the keywords are a guide to reading the map (graphic). How so? I figured maybe numbering the sections, then B=2, A=1, Y=25, etc. But that takes us back into stuff we covered a long time ago, that doesn't seem that relevant now. Doesn't seem to work. Any other ideas how those keywords can be a guide?

>>150395774

>We may have overestimated your ability.

Yeah, it's easy for people who already know the answers to overestimate the ability of others to figure them out from hints. Any teacher could tell you that.

>>150396903

I wondered about that: does he mean the graphic is missing items, or that we're missing items in the graphic and need to review it more. Something he's said since early on is to review the whole thing every time there's news. Now that it's so big, that's easy to skip.