Anonymous ID: 52XiGWcO Nov. 21, 2017, 5:57 p.m. No.150404516   🗄️plebs   >>4848

I've been on board with Q since day one.

I've learned a lot through research and been enlightened.

However, I'm skeptical of Q's latest posts.

It's easy to throw out general questions and key words and, in retrospect, make any connection.

I could post code to you with a bunch of words like "green," "yellow," "bay," or whatever. Then if anything happens in the future that can be tangentially associated with those words, I could imply -- "I'm real. I knew what was coming."

Do you get what I mean?

If Q had been more specific about this on Wednesday or provided an accurate timeframe, I'd buy it.

Plus, with all the important things going on in the world, it seems as if Q is grasping at straws to draw attention to a helicopter crash that didn't involve important players and can be explained by the lack of air traffic control at the time (due to lack of funds).

If someone wants to prove me wrong with actual proof, that's great!

Until Q actually predicts something specific and presents a narrow timeframe,

I'm going to reserve my judgement.