>>150425600

You're kidding, right?

Whenever there's an unanswered question, the answer is always the obvious one.

Alice in Wonderland

Hillary in Saudi Arabia.

Q is treating pol like we're 5th graders, and we're not answering his questions anywhere near right, because for some reason we think he thinks of us as experts on how the world actually works and needs our help solving these puzzles.

No, Q is giving us simple puzzles, that is, if it's not a larp, because there might be some reason why he can't tell us directly, but he can give us the most basic simple hints that we can easily figure them out, unless we think, for some reason that Q wants us to talk about mysterious religions.

This is about Hillary.

Occam's Razor on this one says you can't go wrong with a meme with Hillary, Saudi Arabia, Rothschild and Soros in it. With a $ sign and arrows pointing from Rothschild to Clinton and Soros to Clinton and Saudi Arabia to Clinton. All of this stuff has been proven already. It's what's we're talking about. The pedo stuff is Clinton stuff. Podesta is Clinton. Huma is Clinton, everything that's going on has to do with Clinton.

Looking at this Q post from earlier.

(Repost to correct thread).

Expand your thinking.

What are patterns?

How are patterns formed and isolated?

What are data sets?

What is a map?

Re: Twitter (repeat)(important).

What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?

What is the purpose of this action?

Possible test to understand public / gov’t response?

When was this announced?

When did events in SA transpire?

Who controlled a large portion of Twitter stock?

Why is this relevant?

Expand your thinking.

What is the real purpose of this action?

What is the SS?

Who is the primary person protected under the SS?

What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?

Would POTUS be able to use Twitter post action?

Define the ‘known’ action.

Why is the MSM ignoring this action?

What transpired w/ POTUS’ Twitter account a short time ago?

Re-read crumbs on this topic (necessary).

Two scenarios (lose/lose).

POTUS advised by SS to terminate use of Twitter due to new website tracking policy (cookies) amongst other spyware not disclosed (risk) – 1st time they failed (re-read).

POTUS silenced on Twitter due to new policy (re: SS / risk).

Direct message failure.

POTUS refuses to be silenced.

Bad actors gather metadata and targeting.

Small example of the ongoing silent war.

Options?

Regulate?

Problem: time to complete.

Solution?

Patriots, get the word out.

Jason Bourne (Deep Dream).

Q

The argument being made here is that Twitter is baiting Trump into regulatory action.

I have a lot of trouble believing that Twitter could cause Trump any real difficulty in communication.

Trump is the President of the United States. Can't they set it up to email everyone on his email list every time he uses his phone to update the white house website. And he can send out messages through every place at the same time. 20 accounts on 20 different websites, updating the official website, and the accounts on all the twitter, youtube, facebook pages.

>>150435098

right, but in what way did that distinction actually matter?

>>150435038

>Because Q and team know there is a connection, but cannot see how all the pieces of the puzzle fit together. So, there lazy asses larp in hopes that /pol/ will do the dirty work.

No, that's not what they're doing. They know the answers. For some reason they want us to come up with the answers by ourselves, and they think we're 5th graders, who make good memes.

>>150435422

It's almost as if the US have been the bad guys all along, at least for decades.

>>150435890

Green was one for Rothschild

>>150436847

>Options?

>Regulate?

>Problem: time to complete.

>Solution?

>Patriots, get the word out.

I can't help but think that Trump should have a backup communications plan. One that is not Twitter and one that is not 4Chan. He is the President. He's in charge of the Executive Branch of the government. There are so many government websites, why can't Trump use a government website? It makes no sense, be the President, seize control of what you're supposed to be in charge of.

And what's with Net Neutrality? There better be an FCC reg that requires the phone companies and the cable companies, the high speed internet providers, to provide a uncensored view of the interenet. Uncensored and no favorites. We aren't talking about regulations vs no regulations, there have always been regulations of this. I want to be able to buy "the internet the way it always was" no censorship, no buying faster load times for your website. We better be able to get that still. If they want to build an apple-like closed system for snowflakes who only want their opinion reinforced, with the biggest sites super fast, and conservative viewpoints called hate speech and banned, they can build that, but there better be the option of "normal internet".

I liked net neutrality, but it did hinder innovation, there need to be FCC regs insisting on the normal internet option. While the FCC is at it, the FCC could in theory develop a "no carry" rule. FCC could say that the phone and cable companies CAN'T carry sites that engage in systematic censorship, can't carry sites that cut off users based on off site behavior. Can't carry sites that engage in shadow banning.

I'm not sure that's a good idea, but that's an area they can work on.

You could insist that cable and phone companies who offer different plans offer an "honest" plan. Where to this point we have "free, normal" and "snowflake" we could add honest. Twitter isn't honest. They discriminate.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39219637

The weird names the CIA gives its hacking tools

Snowy Owl

Some hacking tools are named after slightly more obvious signs of aggression: birds of prey.

Bald eagle, harpy eagle and sparrowhawk all feature.

A bird of prey can swoop on its victim almost silently.

Similarly, the sparrowhawk tool can detect the letters you are hitting on a keyboard without you having any idea you are being watched.

Then there is the less threatening snowy owl, which is described in the leaks as a tool designed to remotely operate a Mac computer.

There is a possibility it was not named after the bird at all but instead was inspired by the Brownies.

In a Brownie troop the Snowy Owl is an adult who helps the leader of the troop, the Brown Owl.

"Maybe we have our first indication that there is a woman involved," speculates Mr Woodward.