>>150694730

Would also go a step further and add that no speculation, google-fu it and post sauce links in your posts. With the stuff I've been seeing on twatter, this needs to be reigned in a bit. My 2 cents, been in these threads awhile. Quality has been sliding with newfags arriving. . .

Also found something troubling and something new came up last thread I need to scrutinize more. Let you know what that is in a while. Keep up good work and keep the newfags in line, if /pol eats shit on this it's rep is shot. :^)

>>150695457

We need to reel back on the esoteric speculation and stick the actual Q question. People are coming here to lurk and posting some of this stuff on twitter as if it's 100% fact. We don't need to get a panic going for nothing. Stick to Q. If this runs into 'conspiracy theory' territory before any real proof is gathered, this whole thing will become a pile of shit.

>>150695518

Do NOT spread this unless there is 100% proof. . . if this get's spread 'they' will quickly push it to 'conspiracy theory' land and the sheep will go back to sleep.

>>150695761

No, but I might have found something that might prove this is a psy-op meant to break /pols rep. Need to dig moar. . . Beware what you put out on social media unless it can be 100% proven with sources. Spread the word. . .

>>150695798

Yes, may be psy-op to break /pols rep. Found something earlier, need to dig moar. Beware what you spread to social media, only 100% verified info with sources. Spread the word.

>>150696179

That's fine, stumbled on something troubling ,digging moar. Possible psy-op to break /pols rep maybe? Just spread word to be careful what goes out to social media. . . don't want this to become a shit-show that ruins /pol. 100% verified only with sources. Keep up good work, just try to keep dis-info & speculation to absolute minimum. . . spread word to all here.

>>150697515

Because people are putting info on twitter from here.

https://twitter.com/7th5D/status/933422644699041792

Have the Rothschilds been eliminated? Where is the proof? Do you have a source? It's out there and spreading. What else is spreading that can't be verified? Can this be used to break /pols reputation? Think. . .

>>150698462

But if the info isn't real or we don't yet have the proof 'they' WILL use it against us and anything said by /pol in the future will be shit. . .