Has anyone put forward the idea that "Snow White" could be a refernce to an upcoming event involving Princess Diana?... As I understand it, the signatures arent just signatures of individuals, but also time signatures, event markers involving a certain person, object, or entity. For example, I recall the signature "Hunt For Red October", and Q saying the signature had not yet occurred. This could be a hint to think of the signatures as time/event markers instead of just as codenames.

In a previous post, he mentioned Princess Diana...

What happened to Princess Diana? (believed that she died, but was actually an assassination attempt?)

What was the cover? (the death was the cover story, she in fact faked her own death to get away?)

Why is this Relevant? (still alive, and has the goods on the royal family?)

Why now? (The NWO is being dismantled, making it safe for her to come back, and contribute what she knows to assist in taking down the NWO?)

Old. (a clue pointing to this theory, because she would have aged now?)

Connection. (clue indicating its connected to the NWO?)

News. (another clue pointing to whats going on the news? Referring to the dismantling of the NWO?)

Bad actor. (Another clue indicating the Queen is a bad actor, to indicate the opposition Diana would have to the Queen, to imply Diana may still be alive and a key player?)

We believe Snow White refers to Snowden and the CIA (according to this thread). But what about the story of Snow White? The evil queen, trying to kill the innocent maiden who she perceives as a threat to her... Is it really a coincidence that Q would use a signature, that refers to that fairy tale in a post talking about Diana?

That possible interpretation dawned on me when I was looking through old posts, so I thought I'd share it.

>>151576627

Well, the super computer thing is a possiblity. Given the whole spying on citizens and AI angles. Just thought I'd throw the Diana idea out there and let /pol/ work their magic lol. I missed 2 questions in the Diana post. "Why was she fleeing?" and "what did she know?" Their relevance to the theory I mentioned doesn't really require explanation.

>>151578872

I'm inclined to think 8ch Q is a fake. Either a LARPer, or disinfo agent.

"4ch is compromised." It's a public forum, everyone can see his posts. And as Q said, "bots deactivated on entry." If Q wanted to release more info, I find it hard to believe anyone could prevent him/her from posting on here... Also, while Q could be a group as opposed to a single person, the tone of messages on 8ch don't seem to fit. On here, Q spoke in a detached matter of fact manner. On 8ch, Q posts sound more emotional, like the poster is letting their attitude show in the posts. I suspect Q said everything he needed to for now and left. I don't think it's a coincidence that he left just before everything started happening.

>>151581019

It could be both. Confirmation of Snowden could be disinfo to mislead the enemy. Theres no way of knowing until something happens that confirms what it meant. I just found it a coincidence that it was mentioned in a post about Diana, which could be interpreted as her faking her death. What with the story of Snow White. But who knows.