New and occasional twilight baker from last week here
Out of the questions that you proposed, I think these are the two that I am most interested in.
>* how d'ya deal with anon complaints?
>* what if something is notabled but you think it's shills doing it not anons?
Cool, I appreciate the quick feedback!
>What are your ideas so far?
Honestly after baking a few times I've come to the conclusion that when I bake its my kitchen and I include the things that seem relevant. I haven't noticed any direct complaints to deal with yet, and I would like to think that I would address any real complaints directly as long as the bread isn't moving too rapidly and the person is open to discussion, and if not just ignore them.
When it comes to anon notables I always take a second look if I hadn't taken a hard look yet, if it doesn't seem notable to me I would probably just tell them it's not being added and move on, deal with their complaints after.
>if something doesn't make notables in one bread it will in a subsequent bread if it is truly notable
Thank you, really great point. The same things get brought up multiple times a day whether they are already in notables or not anyway I've (painfully) noticed.
Ah I see, 60fdc9 was a live exercise. Very smart to include in the class! kek
That's pretty much what I do, honestly I don't like to say much if anything at all while I'm gathering notables and checking previous notables (if I haven't already been lurking most of the day and can spot things that were already added)
>What happens when Q starts posting
So far, that is my worst nightmare
>"tx, anon. added."
I do use that line if it's something that I missed, or already added so they don't keep asking me over and over again