>>9793 That's a discussion that needs to happen.
>>9817 Didn't bakers used to do a short list of revisions when posting updated dough? What if revisions were listed as 'page 5' of the paste - not to be included in the bred, but a running list? Would include date/time/revision/reason/baker ID - pastebin name. As needed when the list gets too long, page 5 could become it's own pastebin (kinda like graphic anon does) and the list goes on. That way it's public, but not easily messed with.