Even if FastJack resigns the replacement can't be trusted.
The behaviour seems like infiltration tactics, not plain bumbling.
No return.
https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm
COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..
There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'
[...]
Technique #6 - 'GAINING FULL CONTROL'
It is important to also be harvesting and continually maneuvering for a forum moderator position. Once this position is obtained, the forum can then be effectively and quietly controlled by deleting unfavourable postings - and one can eventually steer the forum into complete failure and lack of interest by the general public. This is the 'ultimate victory' as the forum is no longer participated with by the general public and no longer useful in maintaining their freedoms. Depending on the level of control you can obtain, you can deliberately steer a forum into defeat by censoring postings, deleting memberships, flooding, and or accidentally taking the forum offline. By this method the forum can be quickly killed. However it is not always in the interest to kill a forum as it can be converted into a 'honey pot' gathering center to collect and misdirect newcomers and from this point be completely used for your control for your agenda purposes.
That behaviour, more deliberate disruption tactics.
They want to instill such habits, ridicule for asking a question.
So when the question is about the research or narratives, and the answer is "Lurk More newfag", not only is one anon discouraged from participating, but the others miss the opportunity to put their knowledge into words.
One can have a great store of knowledge, but to be useful one must be able to relate it to others.