“Fascists Out!” – Anti-Police Protesters Show Up to DHS Secretary Chad Wolf’s Home – Secret Service Stand Guard

Anti-police protesters showed up to DHS Secretary Chad Wolf’s home in Alexandria, Virginia on Sunday morning.

The left-wing protesters called for defunding police and DHS.

Anti-police protesters showed up to DHS Secretary Chad Wolf’s home in Alexandria, Virginia on Sunday morning.

The left-wing protesters called for defunding police and DHS.

According to Daily Caller reporter Henry Rodgers, Secretary Wolf and his family were not inside and the Secret Service were standing guard.

Police guided the protesters through the streets of Alexandria but claimed to the Daily Caller that they did not have a permit.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/fascists-anti-police-protesters-show-dhs-secretary-chad-wolfs-home-secret-service-stand-guard-video/

America Invades America

So apparently U.S. President Donald Trump has “invaded Oregon” according to the Mainstream Media and even the governor of the state in question Kate Brown who is not surprisingly a Democrat. This is in reference to the Federal Government sending in agents to arrest protestors often by just dragging them into unmarked vehicles. The Black Lives Matter protests/riots/uprisings have devolved to the point where the American Right and Left seem to be in an intellectual race to the bottom. This is truly a mess but one with many nuances and given the political will could have a solution. Let’s break down both sides of this issue and see where the problem lies.

Trump/Republicans/The Right

A long time ago in an America far, far away during the reign of Bush II we accepted the fact that terrorism isn’t a crime but something else vastly more wicked. Terrorism became its own special category that the normal rules did not apply to even if the accused happened to be American. All of this because 3,000 people died in a country of 300,000,000+ because of hijackers with boxcutters succeeded in their suicidal mission once. The immediate answer to public and media panic resulting in the Overton Window shifting far enough to make waterboarding your neighbor for quick information sound like a great option to save the country from “the ticking time bomb scenario”.

This moment of mass cowardice was going to come back to bite America for sure. At the time (the early 2000s) the Democrats rightfully scolded these Bush-era reinterpretations of American values, but as we see more and more the only reason they were angry was because the other side did it. Stepping further into the future it becomes evident that “homegrown” and “Right Wing” terrorism can and should be fought with the exact same methods according to our bureaucrats in blue.

Based on this awful foundation the status of Antifa becomes very important regardless of if you support or despise them. If Antifa can finally be fully confirmed as a “terrorist organization” then throwing them into unmarked vans without a word is a completely legitimate and legal option. Terrorism is the exception and if you are on that terrorist list they can do anything they want to you. Furthermore, the people accused of financially supporting a terrorist organization may have to deal with men in uniforms storming their house at night or at the very least getting many of their assets frozen… cough, cough, George Soros.

Since terrorism is a special case and seems to have “no jurisdiction” any claims of an “invasion” of Oregon by the feds go right out the window. If Al-Nusra was in Boise, Idaho Trump would be able to deal with them like a varmint infestation in one’s garage – mercilessly and without repercussion. The framework for this sort of NKVD style approach to problem solving is not a Trump Era creation but it is a shame he is choosing to allow it, because when the Democrats get their turn at the wheel it is sure going to be one hell of a ride for anyone who does not kneel to their politics.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/26/america-invades-america/

Israeli Fear Grows: IDF Deployed Heavy Howitzers Near Separation Line With Lebanon

On July 26, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) deployed M109 Doher heavy howitzers near the separation line with Lebanon.

The step was taken against fear in Israel from a close attack by Hezbollah, which lost one of its fighters in the recent Israeli airstrikes on the Syrian capital, Damascus. Usually, the group responds to such incidents by attacking Israeli troops from Southern Lebanon.

The M109 Doher 155 mm howitzer has an effective firing range of up to 30 km, more than enough to target many of Hezbollah’s strongholds in Southern Lebanon.

The deployment of heavy howitzers is the most recent in a series of measures taken by the IDF. In the last few days, several Iron Dome anti-rocket systems were deployed in northern Israel. The army also reinforced its troops in the region with an elite infantry unit.

Furthermore, Israeli drones started flying at a risky low-altitude over Hezbollah’s strongholds in an attempt to lure the group into shooting down a drone instead of carrying out a more serious attack.

In a recent message delivered by the UN, Israel informed Hezbollah that it had not seek to kill its fighter during the last airstrikes on Syria. Nevertheless, the group is reportedly determined to strike back.

https://southfront.org/israeli-fear-grows-idf-deployed-heavy-howitzers-near-separation-line-with-lebanon/

Sneaky Congress Hides Red Flag in National Defense Authorization Act

Congress is hiding a red flag law in the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for the Fiscal Year 2021 (H.R. 6395).

The NDAA authorizes the military to “red flag” anyone subject to the Uniform Code of Military Conduct. According to the NDAA, a friend or relative could report the service member as “abusive.” An ex parte “court” will hear the claims of the friend or relative and decided whether to take firearms away from the accused. The gun owner doesn’t have a chance to defend themselves or even know that someone is accusing them of abuse.

In the civilian world, law enforcement and the courts refer to red flag laws as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPO). The NDAA refers to these red flag laws as Military Court Gun Confiscation Orders (GCOs). Even though the names of the rules are different, both laws work primarily the same way. Like ERPOs, GCOs lack due process. The court would assume the military member is guilty of abuse until they could prove their innocence as a later date.

According to gun rights advocates, the same service members that swear an oath to the Constitution will lose their Constitutionally guaranteed rights under the new NDAA. Military police or SWAT teams would carry out a raid of the gun owner’s house in the middle of the night to strip them of their gun rights.

The service member would then have to prove their innocence to get their firearms back from the same government that they are protecting.

The NDAA leaves a lot of gray areas in the GCO provision that would be filled in by the future White House administration. If an anti-gun politician becomes President, like Democrat Presidential Candidate Joe Biden, then the amount of evidence needed to strip the rights of the service member decrease or the amount of evidence to get the guns back would increase significantly. Anti-gun politicians seem to have this flexibility built into the NDAA intentionally.

Politicians have slipped in this Constitutionally questionable provision into the NDAA under cover of darkness. Politicians on both sides on the aisle have been quiet over the inclusion of the GCO provision. It is unknown why there is silence from self-proclaimed pro-gun Republicans on the issue of GCOs in the NDAA. Some gun rights advocates theorize that they do not know that the provision is in the NDAA. Others feel the Republicans are compromising with anti-gun Democrats to get the NDAA passed through the House of Representatives.

Certain “pro-gun” Republicans are open to Red Flag laws. Dan Crenshaw purports to be pro-gun, but he has called for Red Flag laws in the past.

Gun Owners of America is asking all their members to email their representatives and asking them to oppose H.R. 6395. The gun-rights group is also asking their members to call their representatives at 202-225-3121 to ask them to protect the rights of those that protect us.

Gun Owners of America created an easy to use form at gunowners.org/na07212020/

About John Crump

John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%’ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on leftist deplatforming methods and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, on Facebook at realjohncrump, or at www.crumpy.com.

https://www.ammoland.com/2020/07/sneaky-congress-hides-red-flag-in-national-defense-authorization-act/

Yes America, there is voter fraud. These recent cases prove it.

From Frank Sinatra's hometown in Hoboken, N.J., to LA's Skid Row, dozens of mail-in, absentee and ballot box fraud cases have emerged.

Many news media, political activists and social media giants have gotten on the bandwagon that voter fraud is fiction. It is not.

A review of court cases and recent indictments – including one this week in Philadelphia against a former congressman – finds there have been at least four dozen cases in criminal and civil court since the last presidential election in 2016 in which voter fraud has led to charges, convictions, lawsuits or plea deals.

The schemes have ranged from old fashion ballot box stuffing to absentee and mail-in ballot fraud.

Here are a dozen of the more egregious examples.

Philly Fraud Case Expands

The U.S. Justice Department this past week charged former Democratic congressman Michael Myers with stuffing ballot boxes, bribing an elected official, falsifying records, obstructing justice and voting multiple times in federal elections in Philadelphia.

Myers was the second official charged in the scheme.

Domenick DeMuro, a Democratic ward chairman in that city, admitted in a plea deal that he had "fraudulently stuffed the ballot box by literally standing in a voting booth and voting over and over, as fast as he could, while he thought the coast was clear," ptoecutors said.

DeMuro allegedly had a network of clients who paid him significant sums of money to rig elections over several years.

New Jersey mail-in ballot scheme exposed

Four New Jersey residents, including one city council member and one city councilmen-elect in Patterson, N.J., were charged last month in what state officials was a mail-in ballot fraud scheme. The four were charged with multiple crimes including voting fraud, tampering with public records and unauthorized possession of multiple vote-by-mail ballots.

West Virginia mail carrier nabbed in mail-in ballot scheme

A mail carrier in Pendleton County, W.V., recently admitted to investigators that he altered mail-in voting ballot documents. The U.S. Attorney's Office of the Northern District of West Virginia said in a press release in June that it was charging Thomas Cooper, a worker with the U.S. Postal Service, with "attempted election fraud."

An affidavit supplied by that office to Just the News states the Pendleton County Clerk received several absentee mail-in ballot requests "in which the voter’s party-ballot request appeared to have been altered by use of a black-ink pen." On five of the requests, "it appeared that the voters ballot choice was changed from Democrat to Republican

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/yes-america-there-voter-fraud-these-recent-cases-prove-it

Former Sudanese Parliament Speaker Detained in Khartoum

Former Sudanese Parliamentary Speaker Ibrahim Omar was detained in capital Khartoum on Sunday without divulging reasons, media reported.

According to the Erem News website, Omar participated in a protest last week against the transitional government, which violates his prohibition of taking part in political activity. The ban was imparted on him after the collapse of Omar al-Bashir’s government last year.

Video circulated on social media shows Omar being escorted to a car among chants and jeers.

Omar is the latest representative of the fallen regime to come into the crosshairs of the current hybrid military-civilian transitional government. A host of high-ranking Sudanese officials are currently under trial on various charges, from corruption to genocide.

Al-Bashir’s government was toppled in April 2019 in a military coup d'etat following months of protests. The once untouchable ruler is now behind bars and facing an ever-growing list of charges.

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/202007261079987869-former-sudanese-parliament-speaker-detained-in-khartoum—reports/

It’s Not Just What is “In” The Documents, It’s What’s “On Them” That Tells The Story….

Now that everyone is familiar with how the Mueller Special Counsel Team took over Main Justice (DOJ and DOJ-NSD) in May 2017, let’s take a look at a critical ten days.

On July 12, 2018, at the apex of the Mueller probe, the DOJ-NSD dispatched a demonstrably manipulative letter to the FISA court informing the FISC that the predicate for the FISA application was still valid. {Go Deep} Nine days later, July 21, 2018, the special counsel released the Carter Page FISA application to fill FOIA requests.

The background context is important. House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte was asking Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer for a copy of the FISA application on file in the FISC. Collyer responded saying both Goodlatte and Nunes (Legislative Branch) needed to exhaust all efforts to retrieve from the DOJ (Executive Branch). Congress was questioning the details of the FISA. Unprompted, and needing to keep prop-up the FISA application the special counsel (DOJ-NSD) responded to the FISC saying the predicate was still valid.

Obviously the background of how the FISA application was attained was critical to the special counsel maintaining the validity of their purpose. Hence, despite 18 months of direct FBI evidence that contradicted the primary underpinning document, the Steele Dossier, the special counsel lied to the FISC saying the originating predicate was valid.

The July 12, 2018, letter only surfaced in April 2020 after the FISC reviewed the December 9, 2019, IG report which completely contradicted the July 12, 2018, claims. The FISC responded to the Bill Barr DOJ in 2020 by demanding the 2018 letter be given to congressional oversight via Senator Lindsey Graham. The DOJ submitted the 2018 document and Senator Graham released the letter to the public.

Nine days later, July 21st 2018, the special counsel then released the FISA application to the public under the guise of a FOIA fulfillment. However, what almost everyone missed was that the actual FISA application itself was a very specific version released.

The special counsel released a very specific version of the FISA application. The first two components of the FISA release were from a copy dated March 17, 2017, that was used in an FBI leak investigation. {Go Deep} The special counsel used this version and then added the April 2017 and June 2017 renewals to complete the set.

Take a look at the last page of the first FISA application that was released and there is a much bigger story visible. This page tells us a great deal:

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/07/26/its-not-just-what-is-in-the-documents-its-whats-on-them-that-tells-the-story/

MAXWELL EPSTEIN & WHY BI BI & XI ARE HAPPY

Alibaba’s Jack Ma ordered to appear before Indian court after ex-employee sues over alleged censorship & fake news

Jack Ma, CEO of Alibaba, has been pulled into a lawsuit filed by a former Indian employee who claims the company’s mobile apps censor content. The case comes after India imposed a sweeping ban on Chinese apps.

A district court in Gurugram has summoned Ma in the case, which concerns two Alibaba mobile applications, UC News and UC Browser. According to court filings seen by Reuters, an ex-employee of Alibaba’s UC Web, which developed the apps, claims that the firm censors content seen as embarrassing to China, and that its mobile services are used to spread fake news designed “to cause social and political turmoil.”

The suit alleges that the former employee was sacked after raising objections about the company’s practices. The plaintiff, who reportedly worked as an associate director at the UC Web office in Gurugram until October 2017, is seeking $268,000 in damages.

Examples of alleged false stories spread by the UC apps included a 2017 report that the 2,000-rupee had been banned, as well as a sensational headline from 2018 declaring that war had broken out between India and Pakistan. Neither of the stories was true, although the authenticity of the purported UC content could not be independently verified. The lawsuit also details a “sensitive words list” which allegedly censored keywords in Hindi and English such as “India-China border” and “Sino-India war.”

The presiding judge has requested that Ma and several other executives from Alibaba appear next week in court or through a lawyer. UC India declined to comment on the case but stressed that its business practices are “in compliance with local laws.”

The lawsuit comes several weeks after India banned UC News and UC Browser, as well as dozens of other Chinese apps, citing alleged security concerns. The blacklist includes the popular Chinese social media app TikTok.

New Delhi began cracking down on Chinese business operations in the country following a deadly border clash between the two countries. The June 15 fighting in the Galwan Valley of India’s Ladakh region left 20 Indian soldiers dead, and also resulted in Chinese casualties. Although both sides have worked to de-escalate military tensions, Beijing has strenuously protested against the economic retribution, arguing that Chinese firms in India must be respected.

https://www.rt.com/news/495899-india-alibaba-lawsuit-fake-news/

Top British bank HSBC denies ‘setting up trap’ for China’s Huawei in US investigations

London-headquartered multinational bank HSBC took to social media to say it was not, as Chinese media claimed, “fabricating evidence” against Huawei, which led to the arrest of the company’s chief financial officer in Canada.

In a now-unavailable post on WeChat, the lender said that its actions did not trigger US investigations into the world’s largest supplier of telecommunications network equipment, as the scrutiny of Huawei for allegedly violating US sanctions on Iran began well before the bank’s involvement in late 2016.

“HSBC does not have any hostility towards Huawei and did not ‘frame’ Huawei,” the bank said on Saturday, adding that it would never distort any facts about its clients. “In response to US DOJ’s [US Justice Department] requests for information, HSBC Group simply presented the objective facts. HSBC did not ‘fabricate’ evidence or ‘hide’ facts.”

https://www.rt.com/business/495890-hsbc-huawei-framing-us/

Man Fires at 4 St. Louis Police Officers with Sawed-Off Shotgun, Then Rams Police Cruiser During Pursuit

St. Louis – A suspect fired at 4 police officers with a sawed-off shotgun Saturday night.

23-year-old Peter Web of Springfield was charged after opening fire at police officers with a sawed-off shotgun and ramming his vehicle into a police cruiser.

Police officers were at a gas station parking lot when the suspect drove past them and opened fire.

A sergeant who witnessed the shooting took action and a pursuit began.

Web continued to shoot at the officers during the pursuit, striking one officer in the elbow.

The pursuit ended after Web rammed his vehicle into a police cruiser, injuring two other officers.

KSDK reported:

Peter Web, 23, of Springfield has been charged with three counts of first-degree assault of a law enforcement officer, three counts of armed criminal action, unlawful use of a weapon and resisting arrest.

Shortly after 1 a.m. Sunday, two officers and a sergeant with the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department said they were trying to remove cruising cars from the Crown Mart gas station lot on N. 13th Street when a man drove past them and fired at them with a sawed-off shotgun, shattering their back passenger window.

Another sergeant witnessed the events and a pursuit began. The man continued to fire shots at them multiple times, which struck their vehicle and narrowly missed the officers, police said. At some point during the incident, one of the officers, a 24-year-old man, was shot in the elbow.

The chase ended at S. 14th Street and Chouteau Avenue, when the suspect rammed the broadside of the marked police car of one of the sergeants and then crashed his vehicle into a traffic light.

The suspect was out of ammunition and tried to run away, but was taken into custody by the officer who had been shot and another officer, who were assisted by other officers arriving at the scene. A sawed-off shotgun was recovered from the suspect’s car.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/man-fires-4-st-louis-police-officers-sawed-off-shotgun-rams-police-cruiser-pursuit/

PRAY FOR EACH OTHER

https://twitter.com/Kevin_Shipp/status/1287403001167126528