>>10628473

The gubbamint needs moar time to go over the absolute windfall mountain of Dna evidence that fell into their hands. Matters of Nat Sec. Since when was a person who is sick by no fault of their own a Nat Sec concern? As one victim among many to be tracked in a pandemic, maybe now identifiable in absence of ID, but not in a general criminal or more nefarious terrorist-type of criminal and they have no probable cause to think you, a person infected with C19 is involved in a criminal act. So why invoke anti-terrorism laws to retain your sick self's dna? Fingerprints are used to connect suspects to crime scenes. The use of terrorism laws in this case is very interesting. Are they looking at the spreading of one's own infected DNA is a possible act of criminal intent or just taking advantage of the above-mentioned windfall of dna evidence?

Just saw a story about US police agencies finally going thru old dna rape kits to prosecute the criminals.

Unrelated, but beings to mind all those "unprosecuted" rioting cases in the US. How do you get people unafraid to get arrested and have their picture taken to be entered into the US criminal database? How do you make them less shy? More emboldened, unafraid to be arrested, like their friends who were arrested and released. "There, that wasn't so bad, was it? Kinda fun right? You're the next Rosa Parks, a freedom rider." So anyway, now we've got a lot of their pics (and fingerlrints) to compare with surveillance pics and crime scenes.

>>10641554

It is true that it is not talked about in General. But that is because here is do much to discuss. New drops keep coning. Something new to dig. No luxury time. As one of the diggers on this, we are taking the time to dig on this, knowing that capable anons have things under control in General. By taking time on this here, we are learning a few things not nailed down by the anons in General. Funny, was just thinking on this.

We hope soon to share on General but keep our dig discussions here. We hope that our digs will prove useful in the event of a "future proves past" moment. We do not seek to disprove Q, as some say. We just take the evidence wherever it leads knowing it will all be explained someday.

>>10641584

That is wrong.

>>10618046

Okay, so not hearing from anyone about my calcs for the end of the bike run on 28 August, 2015, I will say that the vid anon posted was quite helpful in that it finally gave us a "known quantity" to compare with the unknown quantity we had in the ROT1 pic regarding the moon's altitude seen. Can finally say, by looking at night sky computer models of this night in the cyclists vid, that the moon in that vid was observed between 9:44p and 10:14p. The computer models for this certain night in London say the Moon would be between 19.31 degrees and 21:94 degrees as seen through London Eye near the axis of the wheel. We never had a number regarding the altitude that we could attribute to what we were seeing in the Q pic to use in comparing night sky models for other dates we wanted to look at for possible matches with Q's ROT1 pic.

>>10641698

Fuck off.

>>10641698

So tell us ALL of YOUR important diggs that are being buried

>>10643110

"Do you think the Royals are finished now? They all seem to have gone into hiding."

Good question. Worth asking twice I think.

>>10643110

-"Do you think the Royals are finished now? They all seem to have gone into hiding."

Good question. Worth asking twice I think.

>>10647863

Though no fan of big-brother intrusive government, I think there was/is an expiration on the time that particular source of dna that was ORIGINALLY intended for a pandemic situation. However, HM govt realized they had a windfall of intelligence that could be used to possibly identify past perpetrators of terror. I think there are currently some very busy beavers burning the midnight oil processing thousands of dna unwittingly provided by bad guys. And think of it, one need not have obtained the actual perpetrators' dna. Anons are no doubt aware of the use of family members' dna used to identify victims like in airplane disasters and such. Look again and notice the anti-terrorism provisions cited as justification to extend the normal holding time on said C19 samples. Just sayin. It is bad guys that need be nervous.

>>10644349

Anon, your tenacity and abilities are inspiring. Am honored if I have helped, or at least tried to help you in these digs. I have been a little resigned and of few words lately, but am inspired to plod on by your efforts. That vid should be considered very notable for reasons stated above. I regard your opinion on timing greatly as you work on vids much, and as to the cyclists vid, I wanted your opinion. Is it your impression that the ride is near its end at Buckingham?

Important. As you have reviewed the original vid, and have an idea of the route taken, are they near the end of the route? Or does the route recross itself? Need to know if my guestimate stated above is in line with yours. Btw, the moon in vid is at 99% and will be a full moon the next day. Given this very important and finally verified info on altitude, I intend going back completely to square one and looking at all moons, excluding new, crescent and quarter moons. Due to poor quality of the Q ROT1 pic, this will give me 15 days per target month to review. Will be looking at everything anew. Remind me of our agreed on bookends? Great digging, Anon. o7

>>10652987

Well, I tried the easiest route first, by just trying to see a time on Big Ben. A lot of stop and start, not quite frame by frame(beyond this plodder's ability), searching for a cap with the least glare. Found one where a cyclist passes in front of Big Ben. It appears to my eye to show BB at 8:37pm or so.

Using that time along with the August 28, 2015 date, ran a night sky simulation on the Timeanddate.com site. It shows an altitude of roughly 12 degrees for the Moon.

See related caps off vid and night sky simulation on Timeanddate.com.

Will be using this altitude to compare our target evenings during Winter 2013/2014.

Please let me know if you do better in the Big Ben cap and find a different result.

>>10661083

Thanks for the enhancement on vid, Anon.

Your vid cap seems to me to be showing around 7:55pm. This is fine. Notice the nice dark blue sky, which appears black at later times in all the vids. This shows that it's not merely a different camera capturing the sky as a bluish aky. So basically it is twilight sky. On AUG 28, 2015, the moonrise was at 7:01pm. This moon was almost a full moon, and therefore it rose around sunset, so in that first hour we see a twilight sky. Thank you, Anon. Am posting an amended night sky simulation for 7:55pm 28AUG2015.

You will notice it also shows a twilight sky in the night sky sim. Thanks, Anon. Good Hunting.

>>10664424

>So the moon on evening 28 AUG 2015 may be the marker that links ROT1 to the Q directive,

It is definitely a confidence builder. Will use the now known altitude (along with heading) to filter and compare simulations for the Winter evenings during Winter 2013/2014.

You know the old saying, "It's always darkest just before the dawn."? Well, it appears the tide is always lowest before the moon (rise). The moon precedes and "draws" the tide along like a magician "drawing" the tide in with his magnetism. Makes sense though, doesn't it? Am going to try to re-graph our known measurements once again.

>>10672117

>>10675409

Much irony here. And much moar to come I think. Those who wanted their independence from the UK and rushed headlong into the arms of their new EU masters will soon regret it when Trump gives the UK the best trade deal they ever saw. Trump hates the EU. The trade deal he makes with the UK will be designed to show, not just the EU, but the world what losers the EU are and what a tremendously great decision Brexit was for the UK. For those who don't know POTUS by now, LEARN OUR COMMS!

>>10738958

>REQUEST for possible tidal/lunar matches for this narrow time range - 11 to 27 JUL 2018. Might make a good interlink between the EMB pics and this one which seems to be kinda isolated both geographically and chronologically. There prolly are some images out there with large moon in behind Big Ben or other nearby landmarks. Moar recent dates may have a better chance of producing such open source images, given improvements in, and increased commonality of, cameras and mobile phone lenses.

Been lurkin while werkin. Well, took a couple of days off but just noticed request.

A survey on a night sky sim has moon from the 11th of July starting as a late waning, almost new moon, then waxing crescent thru July 19. During these late and early crescents, the moon is very close to the sun and is basically a "daylight" moon, seen during daylight hours. Around the 19th the moon passes into a waxing gibbous, but it should be remembered that this phase rises in the early afternoon. As this waxing gibbous progresses to toward a full moon it rises a little later in the afternoons toward 5pm. We could see it in the same vicinity and approx time as London Eye in the cyclist vid. Toward the 26th it might even be possible to get a ROT1 match around 11pm, if one envisions our high value people being chased out of the TATTS at "last call" at 11pm. There was one interesting thing, not sure if important to what you are thinking of, but on 27JUL2018 the moon rose in mid eclipse. Interestingly, around 11pm the eclipse is still visible. See attached. Not sure what you had in mind, anon. Wats up with 2018 and the Moon?

You gonna look at Critical Mass vids for that month?

>>10744101 (me)

Guess these images didn't upload re last post.

>>10744182

Things not to include on your resume:

1. Always tells the truth.

2. Is never violent.

3. Has never been declared insane.

4. (maybe) Ask me about ECT.

>>10744318

>Basic notion was that during the interval of 11 to 27 JUL 2018 there might have been a lunar 'event' that fairly matched the one in ROT1 and then thru such an interlink,

across the span of 2013/2014 to summer 2018, we'd have lifted the apparent isolation of the 'black box' pic.

Interesting. I like it. Toward the end of that time, the last week, Moon appearance is near full. I will look at that last week. So def give those CMass vids a look. That's the night of the eclipse. From 9 to 11ish.

>>10744318

>Just thot we might take it a step closer thru a pair of moon sightings. Suppose that could then link backward to help narrow the time of month, and perhaps the month, of the EMB pics

Good effort. And good hunting with vids.

UPDATE on moon and tides tied in here. After your vid with date(and then-obtainable altitude of Moon) and visual, decided to throw off any previous leanings and back away from being zoomed in on a few dates.

Discarding small moon phases, have kept half(15) dates per month. Creating new (by hand) data spread sheets to include most recent low tides. Pic evidence being what it is, still need to reconcile the LMI6 water level. Since the Thames has a 4-5 hour tide roll-in time, and the LMI6 pic, though high judging by the moorings, shows there is still higher it could go, I think we are 3/4 of the way in the pic. (Another possibility I will be looking at is a tide going down. Most likely not, but will give that a look.)

Not to worry, by my backing away to start again. Think of it like expanding my field of view to narrow it again.

>>10744318

Seems I always leave at least one incomplete thot in a post. The thing with those low tides in the evening. Let me start by mentioning the Mariners' Rule of Twelfths. It uses a 6-hour time for tides to roll in. Will post diagram. What I did was effectively overlay a 5-hour time period over the diagram to get a time when we should expect to see at least 3/4 of the tide rolled in. Why 3/4? Gauging from pics of the Embankment wall, which it appears would max out at 7.2 meters, I thought we should be at maybe 6 meters with 1.2m to go in the LMI6 before the water would be at the base of the pedestrian wall. Basically, it would take approx. 3hrs, 20mins to reach this point from low tide. That's what I am looking at.

If anons want to cross out dates during Winter2013/2014, then here are the dates currently being reviewed:

Eliminate March 2014- a recent new moon. Too small, during daylight hours.

Looking at:

Nov. 11- 24, 2013

Dec. 9- 23, 2013

Jan. 9- 24, 2014

Feb. 7- 21, 2014

Good Hunting.

>>10744206

When was Pratt's first SECTIONING (aka involuntary commitment)? It must have been after the poly(psycho)path-math said he had "no history of mental disease"(another one not to put on one's resume/job application, and before he said he never lies. Could be his other personality that never lies though.

>>10752482