they slaved for a better future for their people, and now other peoples shake their fists and point their fingers, reprimanding us for living better lives, wealthier lives in wealthier countries. why were we allowing these soldiers deaths to be in vain? by the definition, then yes. destabilize, then take control. ignore their demise? they grow up and take the potential homes of your own people for themselves, they occupy positions of power, remove wealth and destroy social trust.

all else is dishonorable. his death will also drive a wedge between the turk invaders currently occupying our lands and the ethnic european people whilst simultaneously weakening turkeys hold on the region, removing a prime enemy of russia and destabilizing and fracturing nato. you wait for a signal, while your people wait for you it is never wise to become a minority group. does anyone even ask why? these repercussions will hit them hard, fast and without mercy. no, carrying out an attack for fame would be laughable.after all who can remember the name of the attackers in the september 11 attack in new york? how about the attack on the pentagon?

>a vote for a radical candidate that opposes your values and incites agitation or anxiety in your own people works far more in your favour than a vote for a milquetoast political candidate that has no ability or wish to enact radical change.