Given the sourcing/routing through Laura Jarrett… do they hope these memo's help their case?
And…how long until they leak?
>The wording of this suggests the criminal referral was sent today.
Read it again.
Nothing about it claims it was today.
It could have been a month ago… it could have been 4 months ago.
I think the AG is almost done, and this is just to prepare the public.
>He thinks this will lead right to Sally Yates as the person shutting down the CF investigation.
The idea that McCabe fought with Yates on the phone over the CF investigation is pure CYA.
More likely, McCabe was trying to explain to Yates that he couldn't just shut down a valid case being led out of one of the FBI field offices without the political interference being too obvious.
He was already on thin ice because he was handling the Clinton email case… he couldn't also stop everyone working on CF.
So they were slow rolling it, and limiting what the office could do.
Always click the link.
Christina is only re-reporting on a CNN report, which lacks the Thursday distinction.
>The Justice Department’s inspector general has sent a criminal referral regarding former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to the US attorney’s office in Washington, according to a source familiar with the matter.
After spending a week trying to reboot the narrative, they are back at this already?
My point was that last week Q talked about how this revelation was premature, and so they were working to reset the narrative of Mueller going after Trump.
Was that the 'RR problems'?
But now they've abandoned that approach? Or it didn't work… as Bloomberg and others are reporting it again.
Or, its just time NOW.
Mueller is NOT getting fired.
How is worrying about that 'catching on'?
They are STILL missing the plot.