Dear Q,

What is your opinion on this guy? Going through his past, he seems like kind of a nutbag–he has pushed to reveal all manner of corruption then advocates for socialism, as if it makes any sense that people would want to centralize power into the hands of the government when they've just been told how horrible it is.

But many of the things he said, and some of the causes he championed, are proving themselves to be true. And I found excellent information on Soros via his "Executive Intelligence Review" magazines (the older ones are better–the newer ones don't seem to reveal much). I am of the opinion that his magazine might be kind of like Wikipedia–use it to get references, then take it with a grain of salt and verify. Of course, it would be nice to get your opinion.

Thanks!

Q, what about Freddie Gray?

I remember there was a slew of documents going around on 4chan that seemed to show contracts for paid crisis actors–I'll upload one here for reference, and I'll be uploading everything in the general thread so it can get reinjected.

Looking through the Soros leaks, you can tell that he has been entrenched in Baltimore for a -long- time. The group associated with the contracts (or at least one of them) is Friends of Democracy, which is Soros-funded.

There was never really an explanation as to how that man died of a severed spine…but clearly, it was the Democrats who benefited. There was much talk of goings-on behind the scenes, but the whole episode seems to have fallen off the map of the public conscience. Did they kill him to spark civil unrest, then offer themselves as the solutions? Like firefighters that start fires for job security? I have long noted that as their modus operadi–inflame racial animus, then present themselves as the cure, then inflame it even more. Who could possibly believe that the way to racial harmony was to separate people on the basis of skin color, treat them differently, and convince one group that the other group owed them money?

I remember the post-Cosby Show transition; as much as Cosby may be maligned today, his show did probably did more to improve people's views of Blacks in this country than any before it. How? By showing them as regular people who had achieved the American dream–that was something we could all admire. Their kids were like ours, their problems were like ours (actually, they were rich compared to most of us…but they had values when dealing with their kids), they worried like we do. The emphasis was that we were the same, not that Blacks had intrinsic differences that we had to understand and adapt to. Of course, soon after the Cosby Show moved on it was back to "In Living Color," and Blacks were again portrayed as idiots capable of remembering, at least, to utter a warning about racism after they'd spent the previous five minutes acting like blithering idiots. I'm pretty sure that this was what Dave Chappel was talking about when he left his show.

I swear, even when I was young I recognized this as either a huge mistake by people trying too hard to overcompensate, or a sinister, sinister move. I know now it was the latter influencing the former.