to take revenge for the enslavement of millions of europeans taken from their lands by the islamic slavers. did you always hold these views? to agitate the political enemies of my people into action, to over extend their own hand and experience the eventual backlash. diversity is unequal, hierarchies are certain the present is a gift from those in our past your ancestors did not sweat, bleed and die in the name of a multicultural, egalitarian nation. i expect to be freed in 27 years from my incarceration, the same number of years as mandela, for the same crime. diversity is anathema to equality. the end result is a nation in gridlock, unable to respond to any great change, unable to commit to any great projects. it may upset many, but the truth of the matter is these people are directly responsible for the current invasion and sacking of europe and their treachery has damaged european prospects greatly. march. but i have only had brief contact with knight justiciar breivik, receiving a blessing for my mission after contacting his brother knights. if they are not of our people, but live in our lands, they must be removed.

why you should risk nothing whilst others risk all? roma, african, indian, turkish, semitic or other. those that find themselves born linguistically in the minority suffer daily, as the conversation of life excludes them, the mass media isolates them and businesses turn them away, as does the societies speech itself. until the hagia sophia is free of the minarets, the men of europe are men in name only the rape of european women invaders many of you may already know about the rape of british women by the invading forces, rotherham of course being the most well known case. we must excel, both personally and as a society. is there a particular person that radicalized you the most?

>do these groups hold power/who are the people in these groups?